diff mbox series

[v2,4/8] io_uring/cmd: Extend support beyond SOL_SOCKET

Message ID 20230808134049.1407498-5-leitao@debian.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series io_uring: Initial support for {s,g}etsockopt commands | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 pending Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Breno Leitao Aug. 8, 2023, 1:40 p.m. UTC
Add generic support for SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT, expanding the
current case, that just execute if level is SOL_SOCKET.

This implementation basically calls sock->ops->setsockopt() with a
kernel allocated optval;

Since the callback for ops->setsockopt() is already using sockptr_t,
then the callbacks are leveraged to be called directly, similarly to
__sys_setsockopt().

Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
---
 io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Gabriel Krisman Bertazi Aug. 9, 2023, 4:32 p.m. UTC | #1
Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> writes:

> Add generic support for SOCKET_URING_OP_SETSOCKOPT, expanding the
> current case, that just execute if level is SOL_SOCKET.
>
> This implementation basically calls sock->ops->setsockopt() with a
> kernel allocated optval;
>
> Since the callback for ops->setsockopt() is already using sockptr_t,
> then the callbacks are leveraged to be called directly, similarly to
> __sys_setsockopt().
>
> Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> ---
>  io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> index 5404b788ca14..dbba005a7290 100644
> --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> @@ -205,10 +205,14 @@ static inline int io_uring_cmd_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  	if (level == SOL_SOCKET && !sock_use_custom_sol_socket(sock))
>  		err = sock_setsockopt(sock, level, optname,
>  				      USER_SOCKPTR(optval), optlen);
> +	else if (unlikely(!sock->ops->setsockopt))
> +		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	else
> +		err = sock->ops->setsockopt(sock, level, optname,
> +					    USER_SOCKPTR(koptval), optlen);

Perhaps move this logic into a helper in net/ so io_uring doesn't need
to know details of struct socket and there is no duplication of this code
in __sys_getsockopt.

>  	return err;
>  }
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
index 5404b788ca14..dbba005a7290 100644
--- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
+++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
@@ -205,10 +205,14 @@  static inline int io_uring_cmd_setsockopt(struct socket *sock,
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
-	err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	if (level == SOL_SOCKET && !sock_use_custom_sol_socket(sock))
 		err = sock_setsockopt(sock, level, optname,
 				      USER_SOCKPTR(optval), optlen);
+	else if (unlikely(!sock->ops->setsockopt))
+		err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	else
+		err = sock->ops->setsockopt(sock, level, optname,
+					    USER_SOCKPTR(koptval), optlen);
 
 	return err;
 }