diff mbox series

[03/11] net: xfrm: Amend XFRMA_SEC_CTX nla_policy structure

Message ID 20230815095310.3310160-4-steffen.klassert@secunet.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [01/11] net: xfrm: Fix xfrm_address_filter OOB read | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format warning Pull request is its own cover letter; Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1345 this patch: 1345
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: tgraf@suug.ch; 3 maintainers not CCed: pabeni@redhat.com tgraf@suug.ch edumazet@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1353 this patch: 1353
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1368 this patch: 1368
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 16 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Steffen Klassert Aug. 15, 2023, 9:53 a.m. UTC 
From: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>

According to all consumers code of attrs[XFRMA_SEC_CTX], like

* verify_sec_ctx_len(), convert to xfrm_user_sec_ctx*
* xfrm_state_construct(), call security_xfrm_state_alloc whose prototype
is int security_xfrm_state_alloc(.., struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx *sec_ctx);
* copy_from_user_sec_ctx(), convert to xfrm_user_sec_ctx *
...

It seems that the expected parsing result for XFRMA_SEC_CTX should be
structure xfrm_user_sec_ctx, and the current xfrm_sec_ctx is confusing
and misleading (Luckily, they happen to have same size 8 bytes).

This commit amend the policy structure to xfrm_user_sec_ctx to avoid
ambiguity.

Fixes: cf5cb79f6946 ("[XFRM] netlink: Establish an attribute policy")
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c | 2 +-
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c
index 8cbf45a8bcdc..655fe4ff8621 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@  static const struct nla_policy compat_policy[XFRMA_MAX+1] = {
 	[XFRMA_ALG_COMP]	= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) },
 	[XFRMA_ENCAP]		= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_encap_tmpl) },
 	[XFRMA_TMPL]		= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) },
-	[XFRMA_SEC_CTX]		= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_sec_ctx) },
+	[XFRMA_SEC_CTX]		= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx) },
 	[XFRMA_LTIME_VAL]	= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_lifetime_cur) },
 	[XFRMA_REPLAY_VAL]	= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_replay_state) },
 	[XFRMA_REPLAY_THRESH]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index 7c91deadc36e..fdc0c17122b6 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -3024,7 +3024,7 @@  const struct nla_policy xfrma_policy[XFRMA_MAX+1] = {
 	[XFRMA_ALG_COMP]	= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_algo) },
 	[XFRMA_ENCAP]		= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_encap_tmpl) },
 	[XFRMA_TMPL]		= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) },
-	[XFRMA_SEC_CTX]		= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_sec_ctx) },
+	[XFRMA_SEC_CTX]		= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_user_sec_ctx) },
 	[XFRMA_LTIME_VAL]	= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_lifetime_cur) },
 	[XFRMA_REPLAY_VAL]	= { .len = sizeof(struct xfrm_replay_state) },
 	[XFRMA_REPLAY_THRESH]	= { .type = NLA_U32 },