diff mbox series

[bpf-next,07/12] bpf: Move bpf_prog_run_array down in the header file

Message ID 20230828075537.194192-8-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add missed stats for kprobes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 2828 this patch: 2828
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 4 maintainers not CCed: yonghong.song@linux.dev kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev song@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1526 this patch: 1526
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 2856 this patch: 2856
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 72 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa Aug. 28, 2023, 7:55 a.m. UTC 
Moving bpf_prog_run_array down in the header file so we can
easily use bpf_prog_start_time and bpf_prog_update_prog_stats
functions in bpf_prog_run_array in following change.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 71154e991730..478fdc4794c9 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1904,36 +1904,6 @@  static inline void bpf_reset_run_ctx(struct bpf_run_ctx *old_ctx)
 
 typedef u32 (*bpf_prog_run_fn)(const struct bpf_prog *prog, const void *ctx);
 
-static __always_inline u32
-bpf_prog_run_array(const struct bpf_prog_array *array,
-		   const void *ctx, bpf_prog_run_fn run_prog)
-{
-	const struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
-	const struct bpf_prog *prog;
-	struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx;
-	struct bpf_trace_run_ctx run_ctx;
-	u32 ret = 1;
-
-	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held(), "no rcu lock held");
-
-	if (unlikely(!array))
-		return ret;
-
-	run_ctx.is_uprobe = false;
-
-	migrate_disable();
-	old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
-	item = &array->items[0];
-	while ((prog = READ_ONCE(item->prog))) {
-		run_ctx.bpf_cookie = item->bpf_cookie;
-		ret &= run_prog(prog, ctx);
-		item++;
-	}
-	bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
-	migrate_enable();
-	return ret;
-}
-
 /* Notes on RCU design for bpf_prog_arrays containing sleepable programs:
  *
  * We use the tasks_trace rcu flavor read section to protect the bpf_prog_array
@@ -2740,6 +2710,36 @@  static inline void bpf_dynptr_set_rdonly(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
 
+static __always_inline u32
+bpf_prog_run_array(const struct bpf_prog_array *array,
+		   const void *ctx, bpf_prog_run_fn run_prog)
+{
+	const struct bpf_prog_array_item *item;
+	const struct bpf_prog *prog;
+	struct bpf_run_ctx *old_run_ctx;
+	struct bpf_trace_run_ctx run_ctx;
+	u32 ret = 1;
+
+	RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_held(), "no rcu lock held");
+
+	if (unlikely(!array))
+		return ret;
+
+	run_ctx.is_uprobe = false;
+
+	migrate_disable();
+	old_run_ctx = bpf_set_run_ctx(&run_ctx.run_ctx);
+	item = &array->items[0];
+	while ((prog = READ_ONCE(item->prog))) {
+		run_ctx.bpf_cookie = item->bpf_cookie;
+		ret &= run_prog(prog, ctx);
+		item++;
+	}
+	bpf_reset_run_ctx(old_run_ctx);
+	migrate_enable();
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static __always_inline int
 bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
 {