diff mbox series

[bpf-next,3/8] arm32, bpf: add support for sign-extension mov instruction

Message ID 20230905210621.1711859-4-puranjay12@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series arm32, bpf: add support for cpuv4 insns | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 1 maintainers not CCed: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 100 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline fail Was 1 now: 2

Commit Message

Puranjay Mohan Sept. 5, 2023, 9:06 p.m. UTC
The cpuv4 added a new BPF_MOVSX instruction that sign extends the src
before moving it to the destination.

BPF_ALU | BPF_MOVSX sign extends 8-bit and 16-bit operands into 32-bit
operands, and zeroes the remaining upper 32 bits.

BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOVSX sign extends 8-bit, 16-bit, and 32-bit  operands
into 64-bit operands.

The offset field of the instruction is used to tell the number of bit to
use for sign-extension. BPF_MOV and BPF_MOVSX have the same code but the
former sets offset to 0 and the later one sets the offset to 8, 16 or 32

The behaviour of this instruction is dst = (s8,s16,s32)src

On ARM32 the implementation uses LSH and ARSH to extend the 8/16 bits to
a 32-bit register and then it is sign extended to the upper 32-bit
register using ARSH. For 32-bit we just move it to the destination
register and use ARSH to extend it to the upper 32-bit register.

Signed-off-by: Puranjay Mohan <puranjay12@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index f7c162479cf2..0a30188de660 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -747,12 +747,16 @@  static inline void emit_a32_alu_r64(const bool is64, const s8 dst[],
 }
 
 /* dst = src (4 bytes)*/
-static inline void emit_a32_mov_r(const s8 dst, const s8 src,
+static inline void emit_a32_mov_r(const s8 dst, const s8 src, const u8 off,
 				  struct jit_ctx *ctx) {
 	const s8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
 	s8 rt;
 
 	rt = arm_bpf_get_reg32(src, tmp[0], ctx);
+	if (off && off != 32) {
+		emit(ARM_LSL_I(rt, rt, 32 - off), ctx);
+		emit(ARM_ASR_I(rt, rt, 32 - off), ctx);
+	}
 	arm_bpf_put_reg32(dst, rt, ctx);
 }
 
@@ -761,15 +765,15 @@  static inline void emit_a32_mov_r64(const bool is64, const s8 dst[],
 				  const s8 src[],
 				  struct jit_ctx *ctx) {
 	if (!is64) {
-		emit_a32_mov_r(dst_lo, src_lo, ctx);
+		emit_a32_mov_r(dst_lo, src_lo, 0, ctx);
 		if (!ctx->prog->aux->verifier_zext)
 			/* Zero out high 4 bytes */
 			emit_a32_mov_i(dst_hi, 0, ctx);
 	} else if (__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ < 6 &&
 		   ctx->cpu_architecture < CPU_ARCH_ARMv5TE) {
 		/* complete 8 byte move */
-		emit_a32_mov_r(dst_lo, src_lo, ctx);
-		emit_a32_mov_r(dst_hi, src_hi, ctx);
+		emit_a32_mov_r(dst_lo, src_lo, 0, ctx);
+		emit_a32_mov_r(dst_hi, src_hi, 0, ctx);
 	} else if (is_stacked(src_lo) && is_stacked(dst_lo)) {
 		const u8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
 
@@ -785,6 +789,24 @@  static inline void emit_a32_mov_r64(const bool is64, const s8 dst[],
 	}
 }
 
+/* dst = (signed)src */
+static inline void emit_a32_movsx_r64(const bool is64, const u8 off, const s8 dst[], const s8 src[],
+				      struct jit_ctx *ctx) {
+	const s8 *tmp = bpf2a32[TMP_REG_1];
+	const s8 *rt;
+
+	rt = arm_bpf_get_reg64(dst, tmp, ctx);
+
+	emit_a32_mov_r(dst_lo, src_lo, off, ctx);
+	if (!is64) {
+		if (!ctx->prog->aux->verifier_zext)
+			/* Zero out high 4 bytes */
+			emit_a32_mov_i(dst_hi, 0, ctx);
+	} else {
+		emit(ARM_ASR_I(rt[0], rt[1], 31), ctx);
+	}
+}
+
 /* Shift operations */
 static inline void emit_a32_alu_i(const s8 dst, const u32 val,
 				struct jit_ctx *ctx, const u8 op) {
@@ -1445,7 +1467,10 @@  static int build_insn(const struct bpf_insn *insn, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 				emit_a32_mov_i(dst_hi, 0, ctx);
 				break;
 			}
-			emit_a32_mov_r64(is64, dst, src, ctx);
+			if (insn->off)
+				emit_a32_movsx_r64(is64, insn->off, dst, src, ctx);
+			else
+				emit_a32_mov_r64(is64, dst, src, ctx);
 			break;
 		case BPF_K:
 			/* Sign-extend immediate value to destination reg */