diff mbox series

[v4,5/5] powerpc/bpf: use patch_instructions()

Message ID 20230908132740.718103-6-hbathini@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series powerpc/bpf: use BPF prog pack allocator | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch, async
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 fail Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Hari Bathini Sept. 8, 2023, 1:27 p.m. UTC 
Use the newly introduced patch_instructions() that handles patching
multiple instructions with one call. This improves speed of exectution
for JIT'ing bpf programs.

Without this patch (on a POWER9 lpar):

  # time modprobe test_bpf
  real    2m59.681s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     1m44.160s
  #

With this patch (on a POWER9 lpar):

  # time modprobe test_bpf
  real    0m5.013s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m4.216s
  #

Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 34 ++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index c89ff34504a1..1e5000d18321 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -26,28 +26,6 @@  static void bpf_jit_fill_ill_insns(void *area, unsigned int size)
 	memset32(area, BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION, size / 4);
 }
 
-/*
- * Patch 'len' bytes of instructions from opcode to addr, one instruction
- * at a time. Returns addr on success. ERR_PTR(-EINVAL), otherwise.
- */
-static void *bpf_patch_instructions(void *addr, void *opcode, size_t len, bool fill_insn)
-{
-	while (len > 0) {
-		ppc_inst_t insn = ppc_inst_read(opcode);
-		int ilen = ppc_inst_len(insn);
-
-		if (patch_instruction(addr, insn))
-			return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
-		len -= ilen;
-		addr = addr + ilen;
-		if (!fill_insn)
-			opcode = opcode + ilen;
-	}
-
-	return addr;
-}
-
 int bpf_jit_emit_exit_insn(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, int tmp_reg, long exit_addr)
 {
 	if (!exit_addr || is_offset_in_branch_range(exit_addr - (ctx->idx * 4))) {
@@ -330,31 +308,31 @@  int bpf_add_extable_entry(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image, u32 *fimage, int pass
 
 void *bpf_arch_text_copy(void *dst, void *src, size_t len)
 {
-	void *ret;
+	int err;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(core_kernel_text((unsigned long)dst)))
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
-	ret = bpf_patch_instructions(dst, src, len, false);
+	err = patch_instructions(dst, src, len, false);
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
 
-	return ret;
+	return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : dst;
 }
 
 int bpf_arch_text_invalidate(void *dst, size_t len)
 {
 	u32 insn = BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION;
-	void *ret;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(core_kernel_text((unsigned long)dst)))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
-	ret = bpf_patch_instructions(dst, &insn, len, true);
+	ret = patch_instructions(dst, &insn, len, true);
 	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
 
-	return IS_ERR(ret) ? PTR_ERR(ret) : 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 void bpf_jit_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)