diff mbox series

[bpf-next,04/14] selftests/bpf: add tests for ring_buffer__ring

Message ID 20230914231123.193901-5-martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series add libbpf getters for individual ringbuffers | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org shuah@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com martin.lau@linux.dev jolsa@kernel.org haoluo@google.com sdf@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com yonghong.song@linux.dev kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!ring" CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "ring"
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Martin Kelly Sept. 14, 2023, 11:11 p.m. UTC
Add tests for the new API ring_buffer__ring.

Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c     | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko Sept. 21, 2023, 1:28 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 4:12 PM Martin Kelly
<martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com> wrote:
>
> Add tests for the new API ring_buffer__ring.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kelly <martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c     | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c
> index 1455911d9fcb..f0729ffaf030 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ void test_ringbuf_multi(void)
>  {
>         struct test_ringbuf_multi *skel;
>         struct ring_buffer *ringbuf = NULL;
> +       struct ring *ring_old;
> +       struct ring *ring;
>         int err;
>         int page_size = getpagesize();
>         int proto_fd = -1;
> @@ -84,11 +86,25 @@ void test_ringbuf_multi(void)
>         if (CHECK(!ringbuf, "ringbuf_create", "failed to create ringbuf\n"))
>                 goto cleanup;
>
> +       /* verify ring_buffer__ring returns expected results */
> +       ring = ring_buffer__ring(ringbuf, 0);
> +       if (CHECK(ring == NULL, "ringbuf_ring", "valid index returning NULL\n"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +       ring_old = ring;
> +       ring = ring_buffer__ring(ringbuf, 1);
> +       if (CHECK(ring != NULL, "ringbuf_ring", "invalid index not rejected\n"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +

we don't use CHECK() for new code, please use ASSERT_OK_PTR() and
ASSERT_ERR_PTR here

>         err = ring_buffer__add(ringbuf, bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.ringbuf2),
>                               process_sample, (void *)(long)2);
>         if (CHECK(err, "ringbuf_add", "failed to add another ring\n"))
>                 goto cleanup;
>
> +       /* verify adding a new ring didn't invalidate our older pointer */
> +       ring = ring_buffer__ring(ringbuf, 0);
> +       if (CHECK(ring != ring_old, "ringbuf_ring", "old ring invalidated\n"))

and ASSERT_EQ() here


> +               goto cleanup;
> +
>         err = test_ringbuf_multi__attach(skel);
>         if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attachment failed: %d\n", err))
>                 goto cleanup;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c
index 1455911d9fcb..f0729ffaf030 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/ringbuf_multi.c
@@ -42,6 +42,8 @@  void test_ringbuf_multi(void)
 {
 	struct test_ringbuf_multi *skel;
 	struct ring_buffer *ringbuf = NULL;
+	struct ring *ring_old;
+	struct ring *ring;
 	int err;
 	int page_size = getpagesize();
 	int proto_fd = -1;
@@ -84,11 +86,25 @@  void test_ringbuf_multi(void)
 	if (CHECK(!ringbuf, "ringbuf_create", "failed to create ringbuf\n"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
+	/* verify ring_buffer__ring returns expected results */
+	ring = ring_buffer__ring(ringbuf, 0);
+	if (CHECK(ring == NULL, "ringbuf_ring", "valid index returning NULL\n"))
+		goto cleanup;
+	ring_old = ring;
+	ring = ring_buffer__ring(ringbuf, 1);
+	if (CHECK(ring != NULL, "ringbuf_ring", "invalid index not rejected\n"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
 	err = ring_buffer__add(ringbuf, bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.ringbuf2),
 			      process_sample, (void *)(long)2);
 	if (CHECK(err, "ringbuf_add", "failed to add another ring\n"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
+	/* verify adding a new ring didn't invalidate our older pointer */
+	ring = ring_buffer__ring(ringbuf, 0);
+	if (CHECK(ring != ring_old, "ringbuf_ring", "old ring invalidated\n"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
 	err = test_ringbuf_multi__attach(skel);
 	if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attachment failed: %d\n", err))
 		goto cleanup;