| Message ID | 20231001054949.14624-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v3] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe | expand |
Hi Dinghao,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.6-rc3 next-20230929]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dinghao-Liu/ieee802154-ca8210-Fix-a-potential-UAF-in-ca8210_probe/20231001-135130
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231001054949.14624-1-dinghao.liu%40zju.edu.cn
patch subject: [PATCH] [v3] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe
config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c: In function 'ca8210_register_ext_clock':
>> drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:2743:13: warning: unused variable 'ret' [-Wunused-variable]
2743 | int ret = 0;
| ^~~
vim +/ret +2743 drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2731
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2732 /**
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2733 * ca8210_register_ext_clock() - Register ca8210's external clock with kernel
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2734 * @spi: Pointer to target ca8210 spi device
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2735 *
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2736 * Return: 0 or linux error code
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2737 */
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2738 static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2739 {
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2740 struct device_node *np = spi->dev.of_node;
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2741 struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2742 struct ca8210_platform_data *pdata = spi->dev.platform_data;
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 @2743 int ret = 0;
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2744
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2745 if (!np)
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2746 return -EFAULT;
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2747
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2748 priv->clk = clk_register_fixed_rate(
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2749 &spi->dev,
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2750 np->name,
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2751 NULL,
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2752 0,
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2753 pdata->extclockfreq
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2754 );
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2755
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2756 if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2757 dev_crit(&spi->dev, "Failed to register external clk\n");
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2758 return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2759 }
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2760
d0603f3c78f0aa Dinghao Liu 2023-10-01 2761 return of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2762 }
ded845a781a578 Harry Morris 2017-03-28 2763
Hello Dinghao, On 01.10.23 09:19, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Dinghao, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] > [also build test WARNING on v6.6-rc3 next-20230929] > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dinghao-Liu/ieee802154-ca8210-Fix-a-potential-UAF-in-ca8210_probe/20231001-135130 > base: linus/master > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231001054949.14624-1-dinghao.liu%40zju.edu.cn > patch subject: [PATCH] [v3] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe > config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/ > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c: In function 'ca8210_register_ext_clock': >>> drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:2743:13: warning: unused variable 'ret' [-Wunused-variable] > 2743 | int ret = 0; > | ^~~ > Please take care of this now unused variable after your re-factor. With this fixed and send out as v4 I am happy to get this applied to the wpan tree. regards Stefan Schmidt
> Hello Dinghao, > > > On 01.10.23 09:19, kernel test robot wrote: > > Hi Dinghao, > > > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > > > [auto build test WARNING on linus/master] > > [also build test WARNING on v6.6-rc3 next-20230929] > > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Dinghao-Liu/ieee802154-ca8210-Fix-a-potential-UAF-in-ca8210_probe/20231001-135130 > > base: linus/master > > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231001054949.14624-1-dinghao.liu%40zju.edu.cn > > patch subject: [PATCH] [v3] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe > > config: m68k-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/config) > > compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231001/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310011548.qyQMuodI-lkp@intel.com/ > > > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > > > drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c: In function 'ca8210_register_ext_clock': > >>> drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c:2743:13: warning: unused variable 'ret' [-Wunused-variable] > > 2743 | int ret = 0; > > | ^~~ > > > > Please take care of this now unused variable after your re-factor. > With this fixed and send out as v4 I am happy to get this applied to the > wpan tree. I will resend the v4 patch soon, thanks! Regards, Dinghao
diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c index aebb19f1b3a4..ae44a9133937 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c @@ -2757,18 +2757,8 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi) dev_crit(&spi->dev, "Failed to register external clk\n"); return PTR_ERR(priv->clk); } - ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk); - if (ret) { - clk_unregister(priv->clk); - dev_crit( - &spi->dev, - "Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n" - ); - } else { - dev_info(&spi->dev, "External clock set as clock provider\n"); - } - return ret; + return of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk); } /** @@ -2780,8 +2770,8 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi) { struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi); - if (!priv->clk) - return + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk)) + return; of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node); clk_unregister(priv->clk);
If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(), it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(), where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call clk_unregister(). Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver") Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> --- Changelog: v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk. v3: -Simplify ca8210_register_ext_clock(). -Add a ';' after return in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). --- drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 16 +++------------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)