diff mbox series

[bpf-next,6/6] selftests/bpf: Add more test cases for bpf memory allocator

Message ID 20231007135106.3031284-7-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Fixes for per-cpu kptr | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: shuah@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 97 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 98 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 fail Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck

Commit Message

Hou Tao Oct. 7, 2023, 1:51 p.m. UTC 
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Add the following 3 test cases for bpf memory allocator:
1) Do allocation in bpf program and free through map free
2) Do batch per-cpu allocation and per-cpu free in bpf program
3) Do per-cpu allocation in bpf program and free through map free

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_ma.c    |  20 +-
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c | 180 +++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_ma.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_ma.c
index 0cca4e8ae38e..d3491a84b3b9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_ma.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_ma.c
@@ -9,9 +9,10 @@ 
 
 #include "test_bpf_ma.skel.h"
 
-void test_test_bpf_ma(void)
+static void do_bpf_ma_test(const char *name)
 {
 	struct test_bpf_ma *skel;
+	struct bpf_program *prog;
 	struct btf *btf;
 	int i, err;
 
@@ -34,6 +35,11 @@  void test_test_bpf_ma(void)
 		skel->rodata->data_btf_ids[i] = id;
 	}
 
+	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel->obj, name);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(prog, "invalid prog name"))
+		goto out;
+	bpf_program__set_autoload(prog, true);
+
 	err = test_bpf_ma__load(skel);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "load"))
 		goto out;
@@ -48,3 +54,15 @@  void test_test_bpf_ma(void)
 out:
 	test_bpf_ma__destroy(skel);
 }
+
+void test_test_bpf_ma(void)
+{
+	if (test__start_subtest("batch_alloc_free"))
+		do_bpf_ma_test("test_batch_alloc_free");
+	if (test__start_subtest("free_through_map_free"))
+		do_bpf_ma_test("test_free_through_map_free");
+	if (test__start_subtest("batch_percpu_alloc_free"))
+		do_bpf_ma_test("test_batch_percpu_alloc_free");
+	if (test__start_subtest("percpu_free_through_map_free"))
+		do_bpf_ma_test("test_percpu_free_through_map_free");
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c
index ecde41ae0fc8..b685a4aba6bd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_ma.c
@@ -37,10 +37,20 @@  int pid = 0;
 		__type(key, int); \
 		__type(value, struct map_value_##_size); \
 		__uint(max_entries, 128); \
-	} array_##_size SEC(".maps");
+	} array_##_size SEC(".maps")
 
-static __always_inline void batch_alloc_free(struct bpf_map *map, unsigned int batch,
-					     unsigned int idx)
+#define DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(_size) \
+	struct map_value_percpu_##_size { \
+		struct bin_data_##_size __percpu_kptr * data; \
+	}; \
+	struct { \
+		__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY); \
+		__type(key, int); \
+		__type(value, struct map_value_percpu_##_size); \
+		__uint(max_entries, 128); \
+	} array_percpu_##_size SEC(".maps")
+
+static __always_inline void batch_alloc(struct bpf_map *map, unsigned int batch, unsigned int idx)
 {
 	struct generic_map_value *value;
 	unsigned int i, key;
@@ -65,6 +75,14 @@  static __always_inline void batch_alloc_free(struct bpf_map *map, unsigned int b
 			return;
 		}
 	}
+}
+
+static __always_inline void batch_free(struct bpf_map *map, unsigned int batch, unsigned int idx)
+{
+	struct generic_map_value *value;
+	unsigned int i, key;
+	void *old;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < batch; i++) {
 		key = i;
 		value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
@@ -81,8 +99,72 @@  static __always_inline void batch_alloc_free(struct bpf_map *map, unsigned int b
 	}
 }
 
+static __always_inline void batch_percpu_alloc(struct bpf_map *map, unsigned int batch,
+					       unsigned int idx)
+{
+	struct generic_map_value *value;
+	unsigned int i, key;
+	void *old, *new;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < batch; i++) {
+		key = i;
+		value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
+		if (!value) {
+			err = 1;
+			return;
+		}
+		/* per-cpu allocator may not be able to refill in time */
+		new = bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl(data_btf_ids[idx], NULL);
+		if (!new)
+			continue;
+
+		old = bpf_kptr_xchg(&value->data, new);
+		if (old) {
+			bpf_percpu_obj_drop(old);
+			err = 2;
+			return;
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+static __always_inline void batch_percpu_free(struct bpf_map *map, unsigned int batch,
+					      unsigned int idx)
+{
+	struct generic_map_value *value;
+	unsigned int i, key;
+	void *old;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < batch; i++) {
+		key = i;
+		value = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map, &key);
+		if (!value) {
+			err = 3;
+			return;
+		}
+		old = bpf_kptr_xchg(&value->data, NULL);
+		if (!old)
+			continue;
+		bpf_percpu_obj_drop(old);
+	}
+}
+
+#define CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(size, batch, idx) \
+	batch_alloc((struct bpf_map *)(&array_##size), batch, idx)
+
 #define CALL_BATCH_ALLOC_FREE(size, batch, idx) \
-	batch_alloc_free((struct bpf_map *)(&array_##size), batch, idx)
+	do { \
+		batch_alloc((struct bpf_map *)(&array_##size), batch, idx); \
+		batch_free((struct bpf_map *)(&array_##size), batch, idx); \
+	} while (0)
+
+#define CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(size, batch, idx) \
+	batch_percpu_alloc((struct bpf_map *)(&array_percpu_##size), batch, idx)
+
+#define CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(size, batch, idx) \
+	do { \
+		batch_percpu_alloc((struct bpf_map *)(&array_percpu_##size), batch, idx); \
+		batch_percpu_free((struct bpf_map *)(&array_percpu_##size), batch, idx); \
+	} while (0)
 
 DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_KPTR(8);
 DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_KPTR(16);
@@ -97,8 +179,21 @@  DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_KPTR(1024);
 DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_KPTR(2048);
 DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_KPTR(4096);
 
-SEC("fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_nanosleep")
-int test_bpf_mem_alloc_free(void *ctx)
+/* per-cpu kptr doesn't support bin_data_8 which is a zero-sized array */
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(16);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(32);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(64);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(96);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(128);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(192);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(256);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(512);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(1024);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(2048);
+DEFINE_ARRAY_WITH_PERCPU_KPTR(4096);
+
+SEC("?fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_nanosleep")
+int test_batch_alloc_free(void *ctx)
 {
 	if ((u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() != pid)
 		return 0;
@@ -121,3 +216,76 @@  int test_bpf_mem_alloc_free(void *ctx)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("?fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_nanosleep")
+int test_free_through_map_free(void *ctx)
+{
+	if ((u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Alloc 128 8-bytes objects in batch to trigger refilling,
+	 * then free these objects through map free.
+	 */
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(8, 128, 0);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(16, 128, 1);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(32, 128, 2);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(64, 128, 3);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(96, 128, 4);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(128, 128, 5);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(192, 128, 6);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(256, 128, 7);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(512, 64, 8);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(1024, 32, 9);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(2048, 16, 10);
+	CALL_BATCH_ALLOC(4096, 8, 11);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_nanosleep")
+int test_batch_percpu_alloc_free(void *ctx)
+{
+	if ((u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Alloc 128 16-bytes per-cpu objects in batch to trigger refilling,
+	 * then free 128 16-bytes per-cpu objects in batch to trigger freeing.
+	 */
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(16, 128, 1);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(32, 128, 2);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(64, 128, 3);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(96, 128, 4);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(128, 128, 5);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(192, 128, 6);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(256, 128, 7);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(512, 64, 8);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(1024, 32, 9);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(2048, 16, 10);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC_FREE(4096, 8, 11);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("?fentry/" SYS_PREFIX "sys_nanosleep")
+int test_percpu_free_through_map_free(void *ctx)
+{
+	if ((u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() != pid)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Alloc 128 16-bytes per-cpu objects in batch to trigger refilling,
+	 * then free these object through map free.
+	 */
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(16, 128, 1);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(32, 128, 2);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(64, 128, 3);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(96, 128, 4);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(128, 128, 5);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(192, 128, 6);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(256, 128, 7);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(512, 64, 8);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(1024, 32, 9);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(2048, 16, 10);
+	CALL_BATCH_PERCPU_ALLOC(4096, 8, 11);
+
+	return 0;
+}