diff mbox series

[bpf-next,2/2] bpf/selftests: Add testcase for async callback return value failure

Message ID 20231009161414.235829-2-void@manifault.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 57ddeb86b311ff41925e0fac7b983c097336f1f3
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,1/2] bpf: Fix verifier log for async callback return values | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 5 maintainers not CCed: tero.kristo@linux.intel.com mykolal@fb.com shuah@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org houtao1@huawei.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

David Vernet Oct. 9, 2023, 4:14 p.m. UTC
A previous commit updated the verifier to print an accurate failure
message for when someone specifies a nonzero return value from an async
callback. This adds a testcase for validating that the verifier emits
the correct message in such a case.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c  |  6 ++-
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/timer_failure.c       | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer_failure.c
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
index d8bc838445ec..760ad96b4be0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/timer.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ 
 /* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include "timer.skel.h"
+#include "timer_failure.skel.h"
 
 static int timer(struct timer *timer_skel)
 {
@@ -53,10 +54,11 @@  void serial_test_timer(void)
 
 	timer_skel = timer__open_and_load();
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(timer_skel, "timer_skel_load"))
-		goto cleanup;
+		return;
 
 	err = timer(timer_skel);
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "timer");
-cleanup:
 	timer__destroy(timer_skel);
+
+	RUN_TESTS(timer_failure);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer_failure.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..226d33b5a05c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/timer_failure.c
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <time.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+#include "bpf_tcp_helpers.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+struct elem {
+	struct bpf_timer t;
+};
+
+struct {
+	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+	__uint(max_entries, 1);
+	__type(key, int);
+	__type(value, struct elem);
+} timer_map SEC(".maps");
+
+static int timer_cb_ret1(void *map, int *key, struct bpf_timer *timer)
+{
+	if (bpf_get_smp_processor_id() % 2)
+		return 1;
+	else
+		return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_fentry_test1")
+__failure __msg("should have been in (0x0; 0x0)")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_ret_1, int, a)
+{
+	int key = 0;
+	struct bpf_timer *timer;
+
+	timer = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&timer_map, &key);
+	if (timer) {
+		bpf_timer_init(timer, &timer_map, CLOCK_BOOTTIME);
+		bpf_timer_set_callback(timer, timer_cb_ret1);
+		bpf_timer_start(timer, 1000, 0);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}