diff mbox series

[net,v3] docs: fix info about representor identification

Message ID 20231010120845.151531-1-mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [net,v3] docs: fix info about representor identification | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 2 maintainers not CCed: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org corbet@lwn.net
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff fail author Signed-off-by missing
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 12 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Mateusz Polchlopek Oct. 10, 2023, 12:08 p.m. UTC
Update the "How are representors identified?" documentation
subchapter. For newer kernels driver developers should use
SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT instead of ndo_get_devlink_port()
callback.

---
v3:
- fixed the lack of hyphen in changelog

v2:
- targeting -net, without IWL
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231009111544.143609-1-mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com/

v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231006091412.92156-1-mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com/
---

Fixes: 7712b3e966ea ("Merge branch 'net-fix-netdev-to-devlink_port-linkage-and-expose-to-user'")
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/networking/representors.rst | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Edward Cree Oct. 10, 2023, 1:54 p.m. UTC | #1
On 10/10/2023 13:08, Mateusz Polchlopek wrote:
> Update the "How are representors identified?" documentation
> subchapter. For newer kernels driver developers should use
> SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT instead of ndo_get_devlink_port()
> callback.
> 
> ---
> v3:
> - fixed the lack of hyphen in changelog
> 
> v2:
> - targeting -net, without IWL
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231009111544.143609-1-mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com/
> 
> v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231006091412.92156-1-mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com/
> ---
> 
> Fixes: 7712b3e966ea ("Merge branch 'net-fix-netdev-to-devlink_port-linkage-and-expose-to-user'")
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Wojciech Drewek <wojciech.drewek@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/networking/representors.rst | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/networking/representors.rst b/Documentation/networking/representors.rst
> index ee1f5cd54496..2d6b7b493fa6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/networking/representors.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/networking/representors.rst
> @@ -162,9 +162,9 @@ How are representors identified?
>  The representor netdevice should *not* directly refer to a PCIe device (e.g.
>  through ``net_dev->dev.parent`` / ``SET_NETDEV_DEV()``), either of the
>  representee or of the switchdev function.
> -Instead, it should implement the ``ndo_get_devlink_port()`` netdevice op, which
> -the kernel uses to provide the ``phys_switch_id`` and ``phys_port_name`` sysfs
> -nodes.  (Some legacy drivers implement ``ndo_get_port_parent_id()`` and
> +Instead, driver developers should use ``SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT`` macro to
> +assign devlink port instance to a netdevice before it registers the netdevice.
> +(Some legacy drivers implement ``ndo_get_port_parent_id()`` and
>  ``ndo_get_phys_port_name()`` directly, but this is deprecated.)  See
>  :ref:`Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-port.rst <devlink_port>` for the
>  details of this API.

I think the text as a whole would be clearer if you kept in the language
 about the kernel using the devlink port to provide the sysfs nodes.
Otherwise the reader will be confused as to why we suddenly start talking
 about them in the parenthetical.
How about:

Instead, the driver should use the ``SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT`` macro to
assign a devlink port instance to the netdevice before registering the
netdevice; the kernel uses the devlink port to provide the ``phys_switch_id``
and ``phys_port_name`` sysfs nodes.
(Some legacy drivers implement ``ndo_get_port_parent_id()`` and

-ed
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/representors.rst b/Documentation/networking/representors.rst
index ee1f5cd54496..2d6b7b493fa6 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/representors.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/representors.rst
@@ -162,9 +162,9 @@  How are representors identified?
 The representor netdevice should *not* directly refer to a PCIe device (e.g.
 through ``net_dev->dev.parent`` / ``SET_NETDEV_DEV()``), either of the
 representee or of the switchdev function.
-Instead, it should implement the ``ndo_get_devlink_port()`` netdevice op, which
-the kernel uses to provide the ``phys_switch_id`` and ``phys_port_name`` sysfs
-nodes.  (Some legacy drivers implement ``ndo_get_port_parent_id()`` and
+Instead, driver developers should use ``SET_NETDEV_DEVLINK_PORT`` macro to
+assign devlink port instance to a netdevice before it registers the netdevice.
+(Some legacy drivers implement ``ndo_get_port_parent_id()`` and
 ``ndo_get_phys_port_name()`` directly, but this is deprecated.)  See
 :ref:`Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-port.rst <devlink_port>` for the
 details of this API.