diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v6,3/8] bpf: Introduce task open coded iterator kfuncs

Message ID 20231018060318.105524-4-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Add Open-coded task, css_task and css iters | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 fail Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary

Commit Message

Chuyi Zhou Oct. 18, 2023, 6:03 a.m. UTC 
This patch adds kfuncs bpf_iter_task_{new,next,destroy} which allow
creation and manipulation of struct bpf_iter_task in open-coded iterator
style. BPF programs can use these kfuncs or through bpf_for_each macro to
iterate all processes in the system.

The API design keep consistent with SEC("iter/task"). bpf_iter_task_new()
accepts a specific task and iterating type which allows:

1. iterating all process in the system (BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_PROCS)

2. iterating all threads in the system (BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_THREADS)

3. iterating all threads of a specific task (BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS)

Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c                          |  3 +
 kernel/bpf/task_iter.c                        | 90 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h  |  5 ++
 3 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index c01441db9fd5..c25941531265 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2563,6 +2563,9 @@  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_adjust)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_null)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
index e4126698cecf..faa1712c1df5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
@@ -952,6 +952,96 @@  __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it)
 
 __diag_pop();
 
+struct bpf_iter_task {
+	__u64 __opaque[3];
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+struct bpf_iter_task_kern {
+	struct task_struct *task;
+	struct task_struct *pos;
+	unsigned int flags;
+} __attribute__((aligned(8)));
+
+enum {
+	/* all process in the system */
+	BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_PROCS,
+	/* all threads in the system */
+	BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_THREADS,
+	/* all threads of a specific process */
+	BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS
+};
+
+__diag_push();
+__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
+		  "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF");
+
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_iter_task_new(struct bpf_iter_task *it,
+		struct task_struct *task, unsigned int flags)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_task_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task_kern) > sizeof(struct bpf_iter_task));
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task_kern) !=
+					__alignof__(struct bpf_iter_task));
+
+	kit->task = kit->pos = NULL;
+	switch (flags) {
+	case BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_THREADS:
+	case BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_PROCS:
+	case BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (flags == BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS)
+		kit->task = task;
+	else
+		kit->task = &init_task;
+	kit->pos = kit->task;
+	kit->flags = flags;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_iter_task_next(struct bpf_iter_task *it)
+{
+	struct bpf_iter_task_kern *kit = (void *)it;
+	struct task_struct *pos;
+	unsigned int flags;
+
+	flags = kit->flags;
+	pos = kit->pos;
+
+	if (!pos)
+		return pos;
+
+	if (flags == BPF_TASK_ITER_ALL_PROCS)
+		goto get_next_task;
+
+	kit->pos = next_thread(kit->pos);
+	if (kit->pos == kit->task) {
+		if (flags == BPF_TASK_ITER_PROC_THREADS) {
+			kit->pos = NULL;
+			return pos;
+		}
+	} else
+		return pos;
+
+get_next_task:
+	kit->pos = next_task(kit->pos);
+	kit->task = kit->pos;
+	if (kit->pos == &init_task)
+		kit->pos = NULL;
+
+	return pos;
+}
+
+__bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task *it)
+{
+}
+
+__diag_pop();
+
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mmap_unlock_irq_work, mmap_unlock_work);
 
 static void do_mmap_read_unlock(struct irq_work *entry)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
index 6792ed2b45d7..2f6c747aa874 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h
@@ -465,5 +465,10 @@  extern int bpf_iter_css_task_new(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it,
 extern struct task_struct *bpf_iter_css_task_next(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it) __weak __ksym;
 extern void bpf_iter_css_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it) __weak __ksym;
 
+struct bpf_iter_task;
+extern int bpf_iter_task_new(struct bpf_iter_task *it,
+		struct task_struct *task, unsigned int flags) __weak __ksym;
+extern struct task_struct *bpf_iter_task_next(struct bpf_iter_task *it) __weak __ksym;
+extern void bpf_iter_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task *it) __weak __ksym;
 
 #endif