From patchwork Wed Oct 18 06:17:43 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Chuyi Zhou X-Patchwork-Id: 13426482 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D221FC5 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2023 06:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bytedance.com header.i=@bytedance.com header.b="QSYq89qR" Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A9A7D5A for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1c8a1541232so56027935ad.0 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bytedance.com; s=google; t=1697609889; x=1698214689; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=AQMAZzziueZcwnJjUGt9dx4cdF9gdrhIA4BtS7H5D4g=; b=QSYq89qRGwdqkI88eFknudZLEHNL+FQlXBBsID2Ru6ED2VNBMRTILK7829IuBjqWcr yUlp40AZvkBaafA5LtjvUm5tyn1jQoYHB4WBaCyRtPnN3Jq4PjNTvGgfjuW+zK32H2kw y1/Wro4D4JBqHFgLgKYoFLPlBl4tW+W+YNvhEnF/x+6XgRsWkvkREA+9ikJW7psBnuut ALJPMPsA0CJcq66wfdLEzGgHOH+5wY/GTaQbs9hjL+wMvFfmmz8d1wcRWwpEeDOorZgF 025XcUdejgrj+g1k+qVVzAS8V8YTBF8pOL2l3WE50UwlZ++o2NSUdOFnuw03kay9kM8I FKQg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1697609889; x=1698214689; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AQMAZzziueZcwnJjUGt9dx4cdF9gdrhIA4BtS7H5D4g=; b=ZF0BSbGnZz+GAUI0rcScMp8CoqGsqy2KlvanPsBZMkMy3P0uaHikMnTVPwDOzIFVsT Iyem9AEHTIq7IioTDfUDjHM7z5VNRetUFFLWtoPWkMS6HusegteN3ZfbApB2nB2dSQFP ZJySPRUZ/Ez7MTw65D0AUoWXo3QwRXIYx9cKQtoHFDG9djQTTv8sG8//tST5g0pZvs8X 1K1dvJs4pFI8PxzLN55jHV/5rjkmKyopstNmVbFp9wU1WjoZgvjO1jaFQ9Tnx65kWims YiXBpUJFR/GiYUgpGPJcVd41eG8oJnQ923T44IcjNVXycaUV+OqSTFUMqpSpEoHPvX1B t5Xw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxOy/fTUax4sDyZIu7ftGVun0+H+CCZxPMe946IN9nbxJGNLRAr OOLV0AsrJoXVeG1yIzknstErFq8xDdj0emudLLk7CQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFZ8MeJruecqBmFQzomJc+TCurL7lNiZnHDNDlVPmH9ZhuMLbV8RjSv0obN05tL+L7JLEH4nA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:249:b0:1ca:2743:bf79 with SMTP id j9-20020a170903024900b001ca2743bf79mr5399429plh.39.1697609889457; Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from n37-019-243.byted.org ([180.184.103.200]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ix13-20020a170902f80d00b001c61acd5bd2sm2659116plb.112.2023.10.17.23.18.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 17 Oct 2023 23:18:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Chuyi Zhou To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chuyi Zhou Subject: [RESEND PATCH bpf-next v6 5/8] bpf: teach the verifier to enforce css_iter and task_iter in RCU CS Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 14:17:43 +0800 Message-Id: <20231018061746.111364-6-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20231018061746.111364-1-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com> References: <20231018061746.111364-1-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net css_iter and task_iter should be used in rcu section. Specifically, in sleepable progs explicit bpf_rcu_read_lock() is needed before use these iters. In normal bpf progs that have implicit rcu_read_lock(), it's OK to use them directly. This patch adds a new a KF flag KF_RCU_PROTECTED for bpf_iter_task_new and bpf_iter_css_new. It means the kfunc should be used in RCU CS. We check whether we are in rcu cs before we want to invoke this kfunc. If the rcu protection is guaranteed, we would let st->type = PTR_TO_STACK | MEM_RCU. Once user do rcu_unlock during the iteration, state MEM_RCU of regs would be cleared. is_iter_reg_valid_init() will reject if reg->type is UNTRUSTED. It is worth noting that currently, bpf_rcu_read_unlock does not clear the state of the STACK_ITER reg, since bpf_for_each_spilled_reg only considers STACK_SPILL. This patch also let bpf_for_each_spilled_reg search STACK_ITER. Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko --- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 19 ++++++++------ include/linux/btf.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 4 +-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index 94ec766432f5..e67cd45a85be 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -386,19 +386,18 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state { u32 jmp_history_cnt; }; -#define bpf_get_spilled_reg(slot, frame) \ +#define bpf_get_spilled_reg(slot, frame, mask) \ (((slot < frame->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE) && \ - (frame->stack[slot].slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL)) \ + ((1 << frame->stack[slot].slot_type[0]) & (mask))) \ ? &frame->stack[slot].spilled_ptr : NULL) /* Iterate over 'frame', setting 'reg' to either NULL or a spilled register. */ -#define bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(iter, frame, reg) \ - for (iter = 0, reg = bpf_get_spilled_reg(iter, frame); \ +#define bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(iter, frame, reg, mask) \ + for (iter = 0, reg = bpf_get_spilled_reg(iter, frame, mask); \ iter < frame->allocated_stack / BPF_REG_SIZE; \ - iter++, reg = bpf_get_spilled_reg(iter, frame)) + iter++, reg = bpf_get_spilled_reg(iter, frame, mask)) -/* Invoke __expr over regsiters in __vst, setting __state and __reg */ -#define bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(__vst, __state, __reg, __expr) \ +#define bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate_mask(__vst, __state, __reg, __mask, __expr) \ ({ \ struct bpf_verifier_state *___vstate = __vst; \ int ___i, ___j; \ @@ -410,7 +409,7 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state { __reg = &___regs[___j]; \ (void)(__expr); \ } \ - bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(___j, __state, __reg) { \ + bpf_for_each_spilled_reg(___j, __state, __reg, __mask) { \ if (!__reg) \ continue; \ (void)(__expr); \ @@ -418,6 +417,10 @@ struct bpf_verifier_state { } \ }) +/* Invoke __expr over regsiters in __vst, setting __state and __reg */ +#define bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(__vst, __state, __reg, __expr) \ + bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate_mask(__vst, __state, __reg, 1 << STACK_SPILL, __expr) + /* linked list of verifier states used to prune search */ struct bpf_verifier_state_list { struct bpf_verifier_state state; diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h index 928113a80a95..c2231c64d60b 100644 --- a/include/linux/btf.h +++ b/include/linux/btf.h @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ #define KF_ITER_NEW (1 << 8) /* kfunc implements BPF iter constructor */ #define KF_ITER_NEXT (1 << 9) /* kfunc implements BPF iter next method */ #define KF_ITER_DESTROY (1 << 10) /* kfunc implements BPF iter destructor */ +#define KF_RCU_PROTECTED (1 << 11) /* kfunc should be protected by rcu cs when they are invoked */ /* * Tag marking a kernel function as a kfunc. This is meant to minimize the diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c index b1d285ed4796..da058aead20c 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c @@ -2563,10 +2563,10 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY) -BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_RCU_PROTECTED) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY) -BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS) +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_RCU_PROTECTED) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY) BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_adjust) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 974713185269..fcdf2382153a 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1173,7 +1173,12 @@ static bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg static void __mark_reg_known_zero(struct bpf_reg_state *reg); +static bool in_rcu_cs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env); + +static bool is_kfunc_rcu_protected(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta); + static int mark_stack_slots_iter(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int insn_idx, struct btf *btf, u32 btf_id, int nr_slots) { @@ -1194,6 +1199,12 @@ static int mark_stack_slots_iter(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, __mark_reg_known_zero(st); st->type = PTR_TO_STACK; /* we don't have dedicated reg type */ + if (is_kfunc_rcu_protected(meta)) { + if (in_rcu_cs(env)) + st->type |= MEM_RCU; + else + st->type |= PTR_UNTRUSTED; + } st->live |= REG_LIVE_WRITTEN; st->ref_obj_id = i == 0 ? id : 0; st->iter.btf = btf; @@ -1268,7 +1279,7 @@ static bool is_iter_reg_valid_uninit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return true; } -static bool is_iter_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, +static int is_iter_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *reg, struct btf *btf, u32 btf_id, int nr_slots) { struct bpf_func_state *state = func(env, reg); @@ -1276,26 +1287,28 @@ static bool is_iter_reg_valid_init(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_ spi = iter_get_spi(env, reg, nr_slots); if (spi < 0) - return false; + return -EINVAL; for (i = 0; i < nr_slots; i++) { struct bpf_stack_state *slot = &state->stack[spi - i]; struct bpf_reg_state *st = &slot->spilled_ptr; + if (st->type & PTR_UNTRUSTED) + return -EPROTO; /* only main (first) slot has ref_obj_id set */ if (i == 0 && !st->ref_obj_id) - return false; + return -EINVAL; if (i != 0 && st->ref_obj_id) - return false; + return -EINVAL; if (st->iter.btf != btf || st->iter.btf_id != btf_id) - return false; + return -EINVAL; for (j = 0; j < BPF_REG_SIZE; j++) if (slot->slot_type[j] != STACK_ITER) - return false; + return -EINVAL; } - return true; + return 0; } /* Check if given stack slot is "special": @@ -7640,15 +7653,24 @@ static int process_iter_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, int insn_id return err; } - err = mark_stack_slots_iter(env, reg, insn_idx, meta->btf, btf_id, nr_slots); + err = mark_stack_slots_iter(env, meta, reg, insn_idx, meta->btf, btf_id, nr_slots); if (err) return err; } else { /* iter_next() or iter_destroy() expect initialized iter state*/ - if (!is_iter_reg_valid_init(env, reg, meta->btf, btf_id, nr_slots)) { + err = is_iter_reg_valid_init(env, reg, meta->btf, btf_id, nr_slots); + switch (err) { + case 0: + break; + case -EINVAL: verbose(env, "expected an initialized iter_%s as arg #%d\n", iter_type_str(meta->btf, btf_id), regno); - return -EINVAL; + return err; + case -EPROTO: + verbose(env, "expected an RCU CS when using %s\n", meta->func_name); + return err; + default: + return err; } spi = iter_get_spi(env, reg, nr_slots); @@ -10231,6 +10253,11 @@ static bool is_kfunc_rcu(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta) return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_RCU; } +static bool is_kfunc_rcu_protected(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta) +{ + return meta->kfunc_flags & KF_RCU_PROTECTED; +} + static bool __kfunc_param_match_suffix(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_param *arg, const char *suffix) @@ -11582,6 +11609,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, if (env->cur_state->active_rcu_lock) { struct bpf_func_state *state; struct bpf_reg_state *reg; + u32 clear_mask = (1 << STACK_SPILL) | (1 << STACK_ITER); if (in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(env) && (rcu_lock || rcu_unlock)) { verbose(env, "Calling bpf_rcu_read_{lock,unlock} in unnecessary rbtree callback\n"); @@ -11592,7 +11620,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn, verbose(env, "nested rcu read lock (kernel function %s)\n", func_name); return -EINVAL; } else if (rcu_unlock) { - bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate(env->cur_state, state, reg, ({ + bpf_for_each_reg_in_vstate_mask(env->cur_state, state, reg, clear_mask, ({ if (reg->type & MEM_RCU) { reg->type &= ~(MEM_RCU | PTR_MAYBE_NULL); reg->type |= PTR_UNTRUSTED;