diff mbox series

[RESEND,bpf-next,v6,7/8] selftests/bpf: rename bpf_iter_task.c to bpf_iter_tasks.c

Message ID 20231018061746.111364-8-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit ddab78cbb52f81f7f7598482602342955b2ff8b8
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Add Open-coded task, css_task and css iters | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 13 maintainers not CCed: song@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com davemarchevsky@fb.com kuifeng@meta.com yonghong.song@linux.dev jolsa@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com shuah@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org sdf@google.com haoluo@google.com martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat

Commit Message

Chuyi Zhou Oct. 18, 2023, 6:17 a.m. UTC 
The newly-added struct bpf_iter_task has a name collision with a selftest
for the seq_file task iter's bpf skel, so the selftests/bpf/progs file is
renamed in order to avoid the collision.

Signed-off-by: Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c        | 18 +++++++++---------
 .../{bpf_iter_task.c => bpf_iter_tasks.c}      |  0
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
 rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{bpf_iter_task.c => bpf_iter_tasks.c} (100%)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
index 41aba139b20b..e3498f607b49 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ 
 #include "bpf_iter_ipv6_route.skel.h"
 #include "bpf_iter_netlink.skel.h"
 #include "bpf_iter_bpf_map.skel.h"
-#include "bpf_iter_task.skel.h"
+#include "bpf_iter_tasks.skel.h"
 #include "bpf_iter_task_stack.skel.h"
 #include "bpf_iter_task_file.skel.h"
 #include "bpf_iter_task_vmas.skel.h"
@@ -215,12 +215,12 @@  static void *do_nothing_wait(void *arg)
 static void test_task_common_nocheck(struct bpf_iter_attach_opts *opts,
 				     int *num_unknown, int *num_known)
 {
-	struct bpf_iter_task *skel;
+	struct bpf_iter_tasks *skel;
 	pthread_t thread_id;
 	void *ret;
 
-	skel = bpf_iter_task__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_task__open_and_load"))
+	skel = bpf_iter_tasks__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_tasks__open_and_load"))
 		return;
 
 	ASSERT_OK(pthread_mutex_lock(&do_nothing_mutex), "pthread_mutex_lock");
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@  static void test_task_common_nocheck(struct bpf_iter_attach_opts *opts,
 	ASSERT_FALSE(pthread_join(thread_id, &ret) || ret != NULL,
 		     "pthread_join");
 
-	bpf_iter_task__destroy(skel);
+	bpf_iter_tasks__destroy(skel);
 }
 
 static void test_task_common(struct bpf_iter_attach_opts *opts, int num_unknown, int num_known)
@@ -307,10 +307,10 @@  static void test_task_pidfd(void)
 
 static void test_task_sleepable(void)
 {
-	struct bpf_iter_task *skel;
+	struct bpf_iter_tasks *skel;
 
-	skel = bpf_iter_task__open_and_load();
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_task__open_and_load"))
+	skel = bpf_iter_tasks__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_tasks__open_and_load"))
 		return;
 
 	do_dummy_read(skel->progs.dump_task_sleepable);
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@  static void test_task_sleepable(void)
 	ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->num_success_copy_from_user_task, 0,
 		  "num_success_copy_from_user_task");
 
-	bpf_iter_task__destroy(skel);
+	bpf_iter_tasks__destroy(skel);
 }
 
 static void test_task_stack(void)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_tasks.c
similarity index 100%
rename from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_task.c
rename to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter_tasks.c