diff mbox series

[RESEND,RFC,v2,05/14] device_cgroup: Implement dev_permission() hook

Message ID 20231025094224.72858-6-michael.weiss@aisec.fraunhofer.de (mailing list archive)
State RFC
Headers show
Series device_cgroup: guard mknod for non-initial user namespace | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR pending PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 pending Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 pending Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1365 this patch: 1365
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 2 maintainers not CCed: jmorris@namei.org linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1389 this patch: 1389
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1390 this patch: 1390
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 48 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Michael Weiß Oct. 25, 2023, 9:42 a.m. UTC 
Wrap devcgroup_check_permission() by implementing the new security
hook dev_permission().

Signed-off-by: Michael Weiß <michael.weiss@aisec.fraunhofer.de>
---
 security/device_cgroup/lsm.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/security/device_cgroup/lsm.c b/security/device_cgroup/lsm.c
index ef30cff1f610..987d2c20a577 100644
--- a/security/device_cgroup/lsm.c
+++ b/security/device_cgroup/lsm.c
@@ -14,29 +14,32 @@ 
 #include <linux/device_cgroup.h>
 #include <linux/lsm_hooks.h>
 
-static int devcg_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
+static int devcg_dev_permission(umode_t mode, dev_t dev, int mask)
 {
 	short type, access = 0;
 
-	if (likely(!inode->i_rdev))
-		return 0;
-
-	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
+	if (S_ISBLK(mode))
 		type = DEVCG_DEV_BLOCK;
-	else if (S_ISCHR(inode->i_mode))
-		type = DEVCG_DEV_CHAR;
 	else
-		return 0;
+		type = DEVCG_DEV_CHAR;
 
 	if (mask & MAY_WRITE)
 		access |= DEVCG_ACC_WRITE;
 	if (mask & MAY_READ)
 		access |= DEVCG_ACC_READ;
 
-	return devcgroup_check_permission(type, imajor(inode), iminor(inode),
+	return devcgroup_check_permission(type, MAJOR(dev), MINOR(dev),
 					  access);
 }
 
+static int devcg_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
+{
+	if (likely(!inode->i_rdev))
+		return 0;
+
+	return devcg_dev_permission(inode->i_mode, inode->i_rdev, mask);
+}
+
 static int __devcg_inode_mknod(int mode, dev_t dev, short access)
 {
 	short type;
@@ -65,6 +68,7 @@  static int devcg_inode_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
 static struct security_hook_list devcg_hooks[] __ro_after_init = {
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_permission, devcg_inode_permission),
 	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inode_mknod, devcg_inode_mknod),
+	LSM_HOOK_INIT(dev_permission, devcg_dev_permission),
 };
 
 static int __init devcgroup_init(void)