Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
13 maintainers not CCed: sdf@google.com jolsa@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com song@kernel.org shuah@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev avagin@google.com haoluo@google.com martin.lau@linux.dev acme@redhat.com
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 9 this patch: 9
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro
WARNING: Use of volatile is usually wrong: see Documentation/process/volatile-considered-harmful.rst
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
|
@@ -995,6 +995,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, /* a program that can execute syscalls */
BPF_PROG_TYPE_NETFILTER,
+ BPF_PROG_TYPE_SECCOMP,
};
enum bpf_attach_type {
@@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC_ESRCH (1UL << 4)
/* Received notifications wait in killable state (only respond to fatal signals) */
#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_WAIT_KILLABLE_RECV (1UL << 5)
+/* Indicates that the filter is in form of bpf prog fd */
+#define SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_BPF_PROG_FD (1UL << 6)
/*
* All BPF programs must return a 32-bit value.
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Hengqi Chen */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <linux/seccomp.h>
+#include "test_seccomp.skel.h"
+
+static int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args)
+{
+ errno = 0;
+ return syscall(__NR_seccomp, op, flags, args);
+}
+
+void test_seccomp(void)
+{
+ struct test_seccomp *skel;
+ int fd, flags, ret;
+
+ skel = test_seccomp__open();
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+ return;
+
+ skel->rodata->seccomp_syscall_nr = __NR_seccomp;
+ skel->rodata->seccomp_errno = 99;
+
+ ret = test_seccomp__load(skel);
+ if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "skel_load"))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+ fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.seccomp_prog);
+ flags = SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_BPF_PROG_FD;
+ ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flags, &fd);
+ ASSERT_OK(ret, "seccomp_set_bpf_prog");
+ ret = seccomp(SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER, flags, &fd);
+ ASSERT_EQ(ret, -1, "seccomp should fail");
+ ASSERT_EQ(errno, 99, "errno not equal to 99");
+
+cleanup:
+ test_seccomp__destroy(skel);
+}
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Hengqi Chen */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+#define SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO 0x00050000U
+#define SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW 0x7fff0000U
+#define SECCOMP_RET_DATA 0x0000ffffU
+
+const volatile int seccomp_syscall_nr = 0;
+const volatile __u32 seccomp_errno = 0;
+
+SEC("seccomp")
+int seccomp_prog(struct seccomp_data *ctx)
+{
+ if (ctx->nr != seccomp_syscall_nr)
+ return SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW;
+
+ return SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO | (seccomp_errno & SECCOMP_RET_DATA);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
Add a testcase to exercise BPF_PROG_TYPE_SECCOMP. # ./test_progs -n 194 #194 seccomp:OK Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> --- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 + tools/include/uapi/linux/seccomp.h | 2 + .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/seccomp.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_seccomp.c | 24 +++++++++++ 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/seccomp.c create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_seccomp.c