diff mbox series

[PATCHv2,bpf-next] bpf: fix compilation error without CGROUPS

Message ID 20231101181601.1493271-1-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 05670f81d1287c40ec861186e4c4e3401013e7fb
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [PATCHv2,bpf-next] bpf: fix compilation error without CGROUPS | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1406 this patch: 1406
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: zhouchuyi@bytedance.com; 5 maintainers not CCed: zhouchuyi@bytedance.com kpsingh@kernel.org song@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1370 this patch: 1370
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1431 this patch: 1431
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 87 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / veristat

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa Nov. 1, 2023, 6:16 p.m. UTC 
From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>

Our MPTCP CI complained [1] -- and KBuild too -- that it was no longer
possible to build the kernel without CONFIG_CGROUPS:

  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_new':
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS' undeclared (first use in this function)
    919 |         case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
        |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:36: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED' undeclared (first use in this function)
    919 |         case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
        |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:927:60: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct css_task_iter'
    927 |         kit->css_it = bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_ma, sizeof(struct css_task_iter));
        |                                                            ^~~~~~
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:930:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_start'; did you mean 'task_seq_start'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    930 |         css_task_iter_start(css, flags, kit->css_it);
        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |         task_seq_start
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_next':
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_next'; did you mean 'class_dev_iter_next'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    940 |         return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
        |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        |                class_dev_iter_next
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct task_struct *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
    940 |         return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
        |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_destroy':
  kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:949:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_end' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    949 |         css_task_iter_end(kit->css_it);
        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This patch simply surrounds with a #ifdef the new code requiring CGroups
support. It seems enough for the compiler and this is similar to
bpf_iter_css_{new,next,destroy}() functions where no other #ifdef have
been added in kernel/bpf/helpers.c and in the selftests.

Fixes: 9c66dc94b62a ("bpf: Introduce css_task open-coded iterator kfuncs")
Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/6665206927
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310260528.aHWgVFqq-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
[ added missing ifdefs for BTF_ID cgroup definitions ]
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c   | 8 +++++---
 kernel/bpf/task_iter.c | 4 ++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c  | 8 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Nov. 2, 2023, 6 a.m. UTC | #1 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Wed,  1 Nov 2023 19:16:01 +0100 you wrote:
> From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
> 
> Our MPTCP CI complained [1] -- and KBuild too -- that it was no longer
> possible to build the kernel without CONFIG_CGROUPS:
> 
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_new':
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS' undeclared (first use in this function)
>     919 |         case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
>         |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:36: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED' undeclared (first use in this function)
>     919 |         case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
>         |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:927:60: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct css_task_iter'
>     927 |         kit->css_it = bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_ma, sizeof(struct css_task_iter));
>         |                                                            ^~~~~~
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:930:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_start'; did you mean 'task_seq_start'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     930 |         css_task_iter_start(css, flags, kit->css_it);
>         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         |         task_seq_start
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_next':
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_next'; did you mean 'class_dev_iter_next'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     940 |         return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
>         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         |                class_dev_iter_next
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct task_struct *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
>     940 |         return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
>         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_destroy':
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:949:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_end' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     949 |         css_task_iter_end(kit->css_it);
>         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [PATCHv2,bpf-next] bpf: fix compilation error without CGROUPS
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/05670f81d128

You are awesome, thank you!
Geert Uytterhoeven Nov. 6, 2023, 8:06 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 7:16 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
> Our MPTCP CI complained [1] -- and KBuild too -- that it was no longer
> possible to build the kernel without CONFIG_CGROUPS:
>
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_new':
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS' undeclared (first use in this function)
>     919 |         case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
>         |              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:14: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:919:36: error: 'CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED' undeclared (first use in this function)
>     919 |         case CSS_TASK_ITER_PROCS | CSS_TASK_ITER_THREADED:
>         |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:927:60: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type 'struct css_task_iter'
>     927 |         kit->css_it = bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_ma, sizeof(struct css_task_iter));
>         |                                                            ^~~~~~
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:930:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_start'; did you mean 'task_seq_start'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     930 |         css_task_iter_start(css, flags, kit->css_it);
>         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         |         task_seq_start
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_next':
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_next'; did you mean 'class_dev_iter_next'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     940 |         return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
>         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>         |                class_dev_iter_next
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:940:16: error: returning 'int' from a function with return type 'struct task_struct *' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Werror=int-conversion]
>     940 |         return css_task_iter_next(kit->css_it);
>         |                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c: In function 'bpf_iter_css_task_destroy':
>   kernel/bpf/task_iter.c:949:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'css_task_iter_end' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     949 |         css_task_iter_end(kit->css_it);
>         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> This patch simply surrounds with a #ifdef the new code requiring CGroups
> support. It seems enough for the compiler and this is similar to
> bpf_iter_css_{new,next,destroy}() functions where no other #ifdef have
> been added in kernel/bpf/helpers.c and in the selftests.
>
> Fixes: 9c66dc94b62a ("bpf: Introduce css_task open-coded iterator kfuncs")
> Link: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/actions/runs/6665206927
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310260528.aHWgVFqq-lkp@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matttbe@kernel.org>
> [ added missing ifdefs for BTF_ID cgroup definitions ]
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

Thank you, this (finally, reported first on Oct 20!) fixes the build of
e.g. m68k/defconfig.

Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index e46ac288a108..95449ea7cc1b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2564,15 +2564,17 @@  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_num_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_vma_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_RCU)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_vma_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_RCU_PROTECTED)
-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_RCU_PROTECTED)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_css_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
+#endif
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_new, KF_ITER_NEW | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_RCU_PROTECTED)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_next, KF_ITER_NEXT | KF_RET_NULL)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_iter_task_destroy, KF_ITER_DESTROY)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_adjust)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_null)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
index 59e747938bdb..e0d313114a5b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/task_iter.c
@@ -894,6 +894,8 @@  __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_task_vma_destroy(struct bpf_iter_task_vma *it)
 
 __diag_pop();
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
+
 struct bpf_iter_css_task {
 	__u64 __opaque[1];
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
@@ -952,6 +954,8 @@  __bpf_kfunc void bpf_iter_css_task_destroy(struct bpf_iter_css_task *it)
 
 __diag_pop();
 
+#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUPS */
+
 struct bpf_iter_task {
 	__u64 __opaque[3];
 } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index e42ce974b106..f2afb17a1534 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5421,7 +5421,9 @@  static bool in_rcu_cs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 /* Once GCC supports btf_type_tag the following mechanism will be replaced with tag check */
 BTF_SET_START(rcu_protected_types)
 BTF_ID(struct, prog_test_ref_kfunc)
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
 BTF_ID(struct, cgroup)
+#endif
 BTF_ID(struct, bpf_cpumask)
 BTF_ID(struct, task_struct)
 BTF_SET_END(rcu_protected_types)
@@ -10873,7 +10875,9 @@  BTF_ID(func, bpf_dynptr_clone)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_throw)
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
+#endif
 BTF_SET_END(special_kfunc_set)
 
 BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
@@ -10899,7 +10903,11 @@  BTF_ID(func, bpf_dynptr_clone)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_throw)
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUPS
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_iter_css_task_new)
+#else
+BTF_ID_UNUSED
+#endif
 
 static bool is_kfunc_ret_null(struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta *meta)
 {