diff mbox series

[v10,bpf-next,02/17] bpf: add BPF token delegation mount options to BPF FS

Message ID 20231110034838.1295764-3-andrii@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Handled Elsewhere, archived
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series BPF token and BPF FS-based delegation | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format fail Series longer than 15 patches (and no cover letter)
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 2677 this patch: 2677
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 10 maintainers not CCed: jolsa@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com ast@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev daniel@iogearbox.net martin.lau@linux.dev sdf@google.com song@kernel.org haoluo@google.com kpsingh@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1296 this patch: 1296
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 2756 this patch: 2756
netdev/checkpatch fail ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf WARNING: kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict

Commit Message

Andrii Nakryiko Nov. 10, 2023, 3:48 a.m. UTC
Add few new mount options to BPF FS that allow to specify that a given
BPF FS instance allows creation of BPF token (added in the next patch),
and what sort of operations are allowed under BPF token. As such, we get
4 new mount options, each is a bit mask
  - `delegate_cmds` allow to specify which bpf() syscall commands are
    allowed with BPF token derived from this BPF FS instance;
  - if BPF_MAP_CREATE command is allowed, `delegate_maps` specifies
    a set of allowable BPF map types that could be created with BPF token;
  - if BPF_PROG_LOAD command is allowed, `delegate_progs` specifies
    a set of allowable BPF program types that could be loaded with BPF token;
  - if BPF_PROG_LOAD command is allowed, `delegate_attachs` specifies
    a set of allowable BPF program attach types that could be loaded with
    BPF token; delegate_progs and delegate_attachs are meant to be used
    together, as full BPF program type is, in general, determined
    through both program type and program attach type.

Currently, these mount options accept the following forms of values:
  - a special value "any", that enables all possible values of a given
  bit set;
  - numeric value (decimal or hexadecimal, determined by kernel
  automatically) that specifies a bit mask value directly;
  - all the values for a given mount option are combined, if specified
  multiple times. E.g., `mount -t bpf nodev /path/to/mount -o
  delegate_maps=0x1 -o delegate_maps=0x2` will result in a combined 0x3
  mask.

Ideally, more convenient (for humans) symbolic form derived from
corresponding UAPI enums would be accepted (e.g., `-o
delegate_progs=kprobe|tracepoint`) and I intend to implement this, but
it requires a bunch of UAPI header churn, so I postponed it until this
feature lands upstream or at least there is a definite consensus that
this feature is acceptable and is going to make it, just to minimize
amount of wasted effort and not increase amount of non-essential code to
be reviewed.

Attentive reader will notice that BPF FS is now marked as
FS_USERNS_MOUNT, which theoretically makes it mountable inside non-init
user namespace as long as the process has sufficient *namespaced*
capabilities within that user namespace. But in reality we still
restrict BPF FS to be mountable only by processes with CAP_SYS_ADMIN *in
init userns* (extra check in bpf_fill_super()). FS_USERNS_MOUNT is added
to allow creating BPF FS context object (i.e., fsopen("bpf")) from
inside unprivileged process inside non-init userns, to capture that
userns as the owning userns. It will still be required to pass this
context object back to privileged process to instantiate and mount it.

This manipulation is important, because capturing non-init userns as the
owning userns of BPF FS instance (super block) allows to use that userns
to constraint BPF token to that userns later on (see next patch). So
creating BPF FS with delegation inside unprivileged userns will restrict
derived BPF token objects to only "work" inside that intended userns,
making it scoped to a intended "container". Also, setting these
delegation options requires capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), so unprivileged
process cannot set this up without involvement of a privileged process.

There is a set of selftests at the end of the patch set that simulates
this sequence of steps and validates that everything works as intended.
But careful review is requested to make sure there are no missed gaps in
the implementation and testing.

This somewhat subtle set of aspects is the result of previous
discussions ([0]) about various user namespace implications and
interactions with BPF token functionality and is necessary to contain
BPF token inside intended user namespace.

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h | 10 +++++
 kernel/bpf/inode.c  | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 4001d11be151..aeffd71cda3c 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1564,6 +1564,16 @@  struct bpf_link_primer {
 	u32 id;
 };
 
+struct bpf_mount_opts {
+	umode_t mode;
+
+	/* BPF token-related delegation options */
+	u64 delegate_cmds;
+	u64 delegate_maps;
+	u64 delegate_progs;
+	u64 delegate_attachs;
+};
+
 struct bpf_struct_ops_value;
 struct btf_member;
 
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
index 1aafb2ff2e95..53313a95fdc6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/filter.h>
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
 #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
+#include <linux/kstrtox.h>
 #include "preload/bpf_preload.h"
 
 enum bpf_type {
@@ -599,10 +600,31 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_prog_get_type_path);
  */
 static int bpf_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
 {
+	struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = root->d_sb->s_fs_info;
 	umode_t mode = d_inode(root)->i_mode & S_IALLUGO & ~S_ISVTX;
 
 	if (mode != S_IRWXUGO)
 		seq_printf(m, ",mode=%o", mode);
+
+	if (opts->delegate_cmds == ~0ULL)
+		seq_printf(m, ",delegate_cmds=any");
+	else if (opts->delegate_cmds)
+		seq_printf(m, ",delegate_cmds=0x%llx", opts->delegate_cmds);
+
+	if (opts->delegate_maps == ~0ULL)
+		seq_printf(m, ",delegate_maps=any");
+	else if (opts->delegate_maps)
+		seq_printf(m, ",delegate_maps=0x%llx", opts->delegate_maps);
+
+	if (opts->delegate_progs == ~0ULL)
+		seq_printf(m, ",delegate_progs=any");
+	else if (opts->delegate_progs)
+		seq_printf(m, ",delegate_progs=0x%llx", opts->delegate_progs);
+
+	if (opts->delegate_attachs == ~0ULL)
+		seq_printf(m, ",delegate_attachs=any");
+	else if (opts->delegate_attachs)
+		seq_printf(m, ",delegate_attachs=0x%llx", opts->delegate_attachs);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -626,22 +648,27 @@  static const struct super_operations bpf_super_ops = {
 
 enum {
 	OPT_MODE,
+	OPT_DELEGATE_CMDS,
+	OPT_DELEGATE_MAPS,
+	OPT_DELEGATE_PROGS,
+	OPT_DELEGATE_ATTACHS,
 };
 
 static const struct fs_parameter_spec bpf_fs_parameters[] = {
 	fsparam_u32oct	("mode",			OPT_MODE),
+	fsparam_string	("delegate_cmds",		OPT_DELEGATE_CMDS),
+	fsparam_string	("delegate_maps",		OPT_DELEGATE_MAPS),
+	fsparam_string	("delegate_progs",		OPT_DELEGATE_PROGS),
+	fsparam_string	("delegate_attachs",		OPT_DELEGATE_ATTACHS),
 	{}
 };
 
-struct bpf_mount_opts {
-	umode_t mode;
-};
-
 static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
 {
-	struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = fc->fs_private;
+	struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = fc->s_fs_info;
 	struct fs_parse_result result;
-	int opt;
+	int opt, err;
+	u64 msk;
 
 	opt = fs_parse(fc, bpf_fs_parameters, param, &result);
 	if (opt < 0) {
@@ -665,6 +692,28 @@  static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
 	case OPT_MODE:
 		opts->mode = result.uint_32 & S_IALLUGO;
 		break;
+	case OPT_DELEGATE_CMDS:
+	case OPT_DELEGATE_MAPS:
+	case OPT_DELEGATE_PROGS:
+	case OPT_DELEGATE_ATTACHS:
+		if (strcmp(param->string, "any") == 0) {
+			msk = ~0ULL;
+		} else {
+			err = kstrtou64(param->string, 0, &msk);
+			if (err)
+				return err;
+		}
+		/* Setting delegation mount options requires privileges */
+		if (msk && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+			return -EPERM;
+		switch (opt) {
+		case OPT_DELEGATE_CMDS: opts->delegate_cmds |= msk; break;
+		case OPT_DELEGATE_MAPS: opts->delegate_maps |= msk; break;
+		case OPT_DELEGATE_PROGS: opts->delegate_progs |= msk; break;
+		case OPT_DELEGATE_ATTACHS: opts->delegate_attachs |= msk; break;
+		default: return -EINVAL;
+		}
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -739,10 +788,14 @@  static int populate_bpffs(struct dentry *parent)
 static int bpf_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
 {
 	static const struct tree_descr bpf_rfiles[] = { { "" } };
-	struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = fc->fs_private;
+	struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = sb->s_fs_info;
 	struct inode *inode;
 	int ret;
 
+	/* Mounting an instance of BPF FS requires privileges */
+	if (fc->user_ns != &init_user_ns && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+		return -EPERM;
+
 	ret = simple_fill_super(sb, BPF_FS_MAGIC, bpf_rfiles);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -764,7 +817,10 @@  static int bpf_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
 
 static void bpf_free_fc(struct fs_context *fc)
 {
-	kfree(fc->fs_private);
+	struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = fc->s_fs_info;
+
+	if (opts)
+		kfree(opts);
 }
 
 static const struct fs_context_operations bpf_context_ops = {
@@ -786,17 +842,32 @@  static int bpf_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
 
 	opts->mode = S_IRWXUGO;
 
-	fc->fs_private = opts;
+	/* start out with no BPF token delegation enabled */
+	opts->delegate_cmds = 0;
+	opts->delegate_maps = 0;
+	opts->delegate_progs = 0;
+	opts->delegate_attachs = 0;
+
+	fc->s_fs_info = opts;
 	fc->ops = &bpf_context_ops;
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void bpf_kill_super(struct super_block *sb)
+{
+	struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = sb->s_fs_info;
+
+	kill_litter_super(sb);
+	kfree(opts);
+}
+
 static struct file_system_type bpf_fs_type = {
 	.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
 	.name		= "bpf",
 	.init_fs_context = bpf_init_fs_context,
 	.parameters	= bpf_fs_parameters,
-	.kill_sb	= kill_litter_super,
+	.kill_sb	= bpf_kill_super,
+	.fs_flags	= FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
 };
 
 static int __init bpf_init(void)