Context |
Check |
Description |
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
4 maintainers not CCed: yonghong.song@linux.dev linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org mykolal@fb.com shuah@kernel.org
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/checkpatch |
fail
|
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
WARNING: line length of 100 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 83 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 96 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 97 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
fail
|
Link
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause
#include "vmlinux.h"
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "Dual BSD/GPL";
@@ -32,3 +34,56 @@ int handle_tp_sys_enter_write(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
+
+// struct_ops example
+
+#define BPF_STRUCT_OPS(name, args...) \
+ SEC("struct_ops/" #name) \
+ BPF_PROG(name, args)
+
+void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(tcp_init, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return;
+}
+
+void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(in_ack_event, struct sock *sk, __u32 flags)
+{
+ return;
+}
+
+__u32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS(ssthresh, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(set_state, struct sock *sk, __u8 new_state)
+{
+ return;
+}
+
+void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(cwnd_event, struct sock *sk, enum tcp_ca_event ev)
+{
+ return;
+}
+
+__u32 BPF_STRUCT_OPS(cwnd_undo, struct sock *sk)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+void BPF_STRUCT_OPS(cong_avoid, struct sock *sk, __u32 ack, __u32 acked)
+{
+ return;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops")
+struct tcp_congestion_ops bt_e2e_tco = {
+ .init = (void *)tcp_init,
+ .in_ack_event = (void *)in_ack_event,
+ .cwnd_event = (void *)cwnd_event,
+ .ssthresh = (void *)ssthresh,
+ .cong_avoid = (void *)cong_avoid,
+ .undo_cwnd = (void *)cwnd_undo,
+ .set_state = (void *)set_state,
+ .name = "bt_e2e_tco",
+};
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ mod bpftool_tests_skel {
use bpftool_tests_skel::BpftoolTestsSkel;
use bpftool_tests_skel::BpftoolTestsSkelBuilder;
use libbpf_rs::skel::OpenSkel;
+use libbpf_rs::skel::Skel;
use libbpf_rs::skel::SkelBuilder;
use libbpf_rs::Program;
use serde::Deserialize;
@@ -16,6 +17,7 @@ mod bpftool_tests_skel {
const BPFTOOL_PATH_ENV: &str = "BPFTOOL_PATH";
const BPFTOOL_PATH: &str = "/usr/sbin/bpftool";
+const STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME: &str = "bt_e2e_tco";
/// A struct representing a pid entry from map/prog dump
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug)]
@@ -62,6 +64,34 @@ struct MapItem {
formatted: Option<FormattedMapItem>,
}
+/// A struct representing the map info from `bpftool struct_ops dump id <id>`
+#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug)]
+struct MapInfo {
+ name: String,
+ id: u64,
+}
+
+/// A struct representing a struct_ops entry from `bpftool struct_ops list -j`
+#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug)]
+struct StructOps {
+ name: String,
+ id: u64,
+ kernel_struct_ops: String,
+}
+
+/// A struct representing a struct_ops entry from `bpftool struct_ops dump id <id>`
+#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug)]
+struct StructOpsCongestion {}
+
+/// A struct representing a struct_ops entry from `bpftool struct_ops dump id <id>`
+/// The returned json seems to be a tuple of two elements.
+/// the first one being a MapInfo, the second one being a StructOpsCongestion.
+#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug)]
+struct StructOpsDump {
+ bpf_map_info: Option<MapInfo>,
+ bpf_struct_ops_tcp_congestion_ops: Option<StructOpsCongestion>,
+}
+
/// A helper function to convert a vector of strings as returned by bpftool
/// into a vector of bytes.
/// bpftool returns key/value in the form of a sequence of strings
@@ -264,3 +294,118 @@ fn run_bpftool_prog_show_id() {
);
assert_eq!("tracepoint", prog.r#type);
}
+
+/// A test to validate that we can list struct_ops using bpftool
+#[test]
+fn run_bpftool_struct_ops_list() {
+ let _skel = setup().expect("Failed to set up BPF program");
+ let output = run_bpftool_command(&["struct_ops", "list", "--json"]);
+
+ let maps =
+ serde_json::from_slice::<Vec<StructOps>>(&output.stdout).expect("Failed to parse JSON");
+
+ assert!(output.status.success(), "bpftool returned an error.");
+ assert!(!maps.is_empty(), "No maps were listed");
+}
+
+/// A test to validate that we can dump a struct_ops program using its name
+#[test]
+fn run_bpftool_struct_ops_dump_name() {
+ let _skel = setup().expect("Failed to set up BPF program");
+ let output = run_bpftool_command(&[
+ "struct_ops",
+ "dump",
+ "name",
+ STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME,
+ "--pretty",
+ ]);
+
+ assert!(output.status.success(), "bpftool returned an error.");
+
+ let struct_ops =
+ serde_json::from_slice::<Vec<StructOpsDump>>(&output.stdout).expect("Failed to parse JSON");
+ assert!(!struct_ops.is_empty(), "No struct_ops were found");
+
+ assert_eq!(
+ struct_ops[0]
+ .bpf_map_info
+ .as_ref()
+ .expect("Missing bpf_map_info field")
+ .name,
+ STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME
+ );
+}
+
+/// A test to validate that we can unregister a struct_ops using its id
+#[test]
+fn run_bpftool_struct_ops_can_unregister_id() {
+ let skel = setup().expect("Failed to set up BPF program");
+ let output = run_bpftool_command(&[
+ "struct_ops",
+ "dump",
+ "name",
+ STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME,
+ "--pretty",
+ ]);
+
+ let _link = skel
+ .object()
+ .map(STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Could not find map {}", STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME))
+ .attach_struct_ops()
+ .expect("Could not attach to struct_ops");
+
+ assert!(output.status.success(), "bpftool returned an error.");
+
+ let struct_ops =
+ serde_json::from_slice::<Vec<StructOpsDump>>(&output.stdout).expect("Failed to parse JSON");
+
+ assert!(!struct_ops.is_empty(), "No struct_ops were found");
+
+ let id = struct_ops[0]
+ .bpf_map_info
+ .as_ref()
+ .expect("Missing bpf_map_info field")
+ .id;
+
+ let output = run_bpftool_command(&["struct_ops", "unregister", "id", &id.to_string()]);
+ assert!(
+ output.status.success(),
+ "Failed to unregister struct_ops program: {:?}",
+ output
+ );
+}
+
+/// A test to validate that we can unregister a struct_ops using its name
+#[test]
+fn run_bpftool_struct_ops_can_unregister_name() {
+ let skel = setup().expect("Failed to set up BPF program");
+ let output = run_bpftool_command(&[
+ "struct_ops",
+ "dump",
+ "name",
+ STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME,
+ "--pretty",
+ ]);
+
+ let _link = skel
+ .object()
+ .map(STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME)
+ .unwrap_or_else(|| panic!("Could not find map {}", STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME))
+ .attach_struct_ops()
+ .expect("Could not attach to struct_ops");
+
+ assert!(output.status.success(), "bpftool returned an error.");
+
+ let struct_ops =
+ serde_json::from_slice::<Vec<StructOpsDump>>(&output.stdout).expect("Failed to parse JSON");
+
+ assert!(!struct_ops.is_empty(), "No struct_ops were found");
+
+ let output = run_bpftool_command(&["struct_ops", "unregister", "name", STRUCT_OPS_MAP_NAME]);
+ assert!(
+ output.status.success(),
+ "Failed to unregister struct_ops program: {:?}",
+ output
+ );
+}
Add test to verify that we can: - unregister a struct_ops by id and name - list struct_ops - dump a struct_ops by name $ RUST_TEST_THREADS=1 BPFTOOL_PATH=../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool CARGO_TARGET_X86_64_UNKNOWN_LINUX_GNU_RUNNER="sudo -E" cargo test -- --nocapture Finished test [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in 0.05s Running unittests src/main.rs (target/debug/deps/bpftool_tests-afa5a7eef3cdeafb) running 11 tests test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "version" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_map_dump_id ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "map" "dump" "id" "1851884" "--json" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_map_list ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "map" "list" "--json" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_map_pids ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "map" "list" "--json" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_prog_list ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "prog" "list" "--json" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_prog_pids ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "prog" "list" "--json" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_prog_show_id ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "prog" "show" "id" "3166535" "--json" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_struct_ops_can_unregister_id ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "struct_ops" "dump" "name" "bt_e2e_tco" "--pretty" Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "struct_ops" "unregister" "id" "1851939" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_struct_ops_can_unregister_name ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "struct_ops" "dump" "name" "bt_e2e_tco" "--pretty" Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "struct_ops" "unregister" "name" "bt_e2e_tco" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_struct_ops_dump_name ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "struct_ops" "dump" "name" "bt_e2e_tco" "--pretty" ok test bpftool_tests::run_bpftool_struct_ops_list ... Running command "../tools/build/bpftool/bpftool" "struct_ops" "list" "--json" ok test result: ok. 11 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 1.84s Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com> --- .../bpftool_tests/src/bpf/bpftool_tests.bpf.c | 55 +++++++ .../bpf/bpftool_tests/src/bpftool_tests.rs | 145 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 200 insertions(+)