diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next,01/10] bpf: provide correct register name for exception callback retval check

Message ID 20231129003620.1049610-2-andrii@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series BPF verifier retval logic fixes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to bpf-next
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-16 / veristat

Commit Message

Andrii Nakryiko Nov. 29, 2023, 12:36 a.m. UTC 
bpf_throw() is checking R1, so let's report R1 in the log.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                                | 12 ++++++------
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_assert.c  |  2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c  |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 8e7b6072e3f4..25b9d470957e 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -11805,7 +11805,7 @@  static int fetch_kfunc_meta(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno);
+static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char *reg_name);
 
 static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			    int *insn_idx_p)
@@ -11942,7 +11942,7 @@  static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		 * to bpf_throw becomes the return value of the program.
 		 */
 		if (!env->exception_callback_subprog) {
-			err = check_return_code(env, BPF_REG_1);
+			err = check_return_code(env, BPF_REG_1, "R1");
 			if (err < 0)
 				return err;
 		}
@@ -14972,7 +14972,7 @@  static int check_ld_abs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
+static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char *reg_name)
 {
 	struct tnum enforce_attach_type_range = tnum_unknown;
 	const struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
@@ -15026,7 +15026,7 @@  static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
 		}
 
 		if (!tnum_in(const_0, reg->var_off)) {
-			verbose_invalid_scalar(env, reg, &const_0, "async callback", "R0");
+			verbose_invalid_scalar(env, reg, &const_0, "async callback", reg_name);
 			return -EINVAL;
 		}
 		return 0;
@@ -15126,7 +15126,7 @@  static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno)
 	}
 
 	if (!tnum_in(range, reg->var_off)) {
-		verbose_invalid_scalar(env, reg, &range, "program exit", "R0");
+		verbose_invalid_scalar(env, reg, &range, "program exit", reg_name);
 		if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP &&
 		    prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM &&
 		    !prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type)
@@ -17410,7 +17410,7 @@  static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 					continue;
 				}
 
-				err = check_return_code(env, BPF_REG_0);
+				err = check_return_code(env, BPF_REG_0, "R0");
 				if (err)
 					return err;
 process_bpf_exit:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_assert.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_assert.c
index 49efaed143fc..575e7dd719c4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_assert.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_assert.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@  int check_assert_generic(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?fentry/bpf_check")
-__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has value (0x40; 0x0)")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R1 has value (0x40; 0x0)")
 int check_assert_with_return(void *ctx)
 {
 	bpf_assert_with(!ctx, 64);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c
index 8c0ef2742208..81ead7512ba2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions_fail.c
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@  int reject_set_exception_cb_bad_ret1(void *ctx)
 }
 
 SEC("?fentry/bpf_check")
-__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has value (0x40; 0x0) should")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R1 has value (0x40; 0x0) should")
 int reject_set_exception_cb_bad_ret2(void *ctx)
 {
 	bpf_throw(64);