diff mbox series

[v3] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl

Message ID 20231213041056.GA519680@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 189ff16722ee36ced4d2a2469d4ab65a8fee4198
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [v3] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format warning Single patches do not need cover letters; Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1118 this patch: 1118
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 6 of 6 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1142 this patch: 1142
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1145 this patch: 1145
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 19 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Hyunwoo Kim Dec. 13, 2023, 4:10 a.m. UTC
Because atalk_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue
without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can
cause a race with atalk_recvmsg().
A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow.
```
atalk_ioctl() -> skb_peek()
atalk_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram()
```
Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to atalk_ioctl() to fix this issue.

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <v4bel@theori.io>
---
v1 -> v2: Change the code style
v2 -> v3: Delete old comments
---
 net/appletalk/ddp.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Dec. 14, 2023, 11:10 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>:

On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:10:56 -0500 you wrote:
> Because atalk_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue
> without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can
> cause a race with atalk_recvmsg().
> A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow.
> ```
> atalk_ioctl() -> skb_peek()
> atalk_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram()
> ```
> Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to atalk_ioctl() to fix this issue.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v3] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/189ff16722ee

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
index 9ba04a69ec2a..a852ec093fa8 100644
--- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c
+++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
@@ -1775,15 +1775,14 @@  static int atalk_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 		break;
 	}
 	case TIOCINQ: {
-		/*
-		 * These two are safe on a single CPU system as only
-		 * user tasks fiddle here
-		 */
-		struct sk_buff *skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
+		struct sk_buff *skb;
 		long amount = 0;
 
+		spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
+		skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue);
 		if (skb)
 			amount = skb->len - sizeof(struct ddpehdr);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
 		rc = put_user(amount, (int __user *)argp);
 		break;
 	}