diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,4/5] selftests/bpf: Don't use libbpf_get_error() in kprobe_multi_test

Message ID 20231215100708.2265609-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 00cdcd2900bdb9190d1e75438b39cef74cd99232
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Fix warnings in kvmalloc_node() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-43 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-44 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-45 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-46 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-47 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success SINGLE THREAD; Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 3 maintainers not CCed: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org shuah@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 67 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat

Commit Message

Hou Tao Dec. 15, 2023, 10:07 a.m. UTC 
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>

Since libbpf v1.0, libbpf doesn't return error code embedded into the
pointer iteself, libbpf_get_error() is deprecated and it is basically
the same as using -errno directly.

So replace the invocations of libbpf_get_error() by -errno in
kprobe_multi_test. For libbpf_get_error() in test_attach_api_fails(),
saving -errno before invoking ASSERT_xx() macros just in case that
errno is overwritten by these macros. However, the invocation of
libbpf_get_error() in get_syms() should be kept intact, because
hashmap__new() still returns a pointer with embedded error code.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
index 4041cfa670eb..6079611b5df4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c
@@ -222,6 +222,7 @@  static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
 		"bpf_fentry_test2",
 	};
 	__u64 cookies[2];
+	int saved_error;
 
 	addrs[0] = ksym_get_addr("bpf_fentry_test1");
 	addrs[1] = ksym_get_addr("bpf_fentry_test2");
@@ -238,10 +239,11 @@  static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
 	/* fail_1 - pattern and opts NULL */
 	link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.test_kprobe_manual,
 						     NULL, NULL);
+	saved_error = -errno;
 	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "fail_1"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	if (!ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(link), -EINVAL, "fail_1_error"))
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(saved_error, -EINVAL, "fail_1_error"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	/* fail_2 - both addrs and syms set */
@@ -252,10 +254,11 @@  static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
 
 	link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.test_kprobe_manual,
 						     NULL, &opts);
+	saved_error = -errno;
 	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "fail_2"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	if (!ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(link), -EINVAL, "fail_2_error"))
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(saved_error, -EINVAL, "fail_2_error"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	/* fail_3 - pattern and addrs set */
@@ -266,10 +269,11 @@  static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
 
 	link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.test_kprobe_manual,
 						     "ksys_*", &opts);
+	saved_error = -errno;
 	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "fail_3"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	if (!ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(link), -EINVAL, "fail_3_error"))
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(saved_error, -EINVAL, "fail_3_error"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	/* fail_4 - pattern and cnt set */
@@ -280,10 +284,11 @@  static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
 
 	link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.test_kprobe_manual,
 						     "ksys_*", &opts);
+	saved_error = -errno;
 	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "fail_4"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	if (!ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(link), -EINVAL, "fail_4_error"))
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(saved_error, -EINVAL, "fail_4_error"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 	/* fail_5 - pattern and cookies */
@@ -294,10 +299,11 @@  static void test_attach_api_fails(void)
 
 	link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts(skel->progs.test_kprobe_manual,
 						     "ksys_*", &opts);
+	saved_error = -errno;
 	if (!ASSERT_ERR_PTR(link, "fail_5"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
-	if (!ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(link), -EINVAL, "fail_5_error"))
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(saved_error, -EINVAL, "fail_5_error"))
 		goto cleanup;
 
 cleanup: