diff mbox series

[bpf-next] bpf: Re-support uid and gid when mounting bpffs

Message ID 20231220133805.20953-1-daniel@iogearbox.net (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit b08c8fc0411dce0fc44b78ce4d67f1b67c35c196
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] bpf: Re-support uid and gid when mounting bpffs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success SINGLE THREAD; Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1117 this patch: 1117
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 9 maintainers not CCed: sdf@google.com haoluo@google.com martin.lau@linux.dev jolsa@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org yonghong.song@linux.dev ast@kernel.org song@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1143 this patch: 1143
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1144 this patch: 1144
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 104 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Daniel Borkmann Dec. 20, 2023, 1:38 p.m. UTC
For a clean, conflict-free revert of the token-related patches in commit
d17aff807f84 ("Revert BPF token-related functionality"), the bpf fs commit
750e785796bb ("bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs") was undone
temporarily as well.

This patch manually re-adds the functionality from the original one back
in 750e785796bb, no other functional changes intended.

Testing:

  # mount -t bpf -o uid=65534,gid=65534 bpffs ./foo
  # ls -la . | grep foo
  drwxrwxrwt   2 nobody nogroup          0 Dec 20 13:16 foo
  # mount -t bpf
  bpffs on /root/foo type bpf (rw,relatime,uid=65534,gid=65534)

Also, passing invalid arguments for uid/gid are properly rejected as expected.

Fixes: d17aff807f84 ("Revert BPF token-related functionality")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jie Jiang <jiejiang@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
---
 kernel/bpf/inode.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Christian Brauner Dec. 21, 2023, 1:10 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 02:38:05PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> For a clean, conflict-free revert of the token-related patches in commit
> d17aff807f84 ("Revert BPF token-related functionality"), the bpf fs commit
> 750e785796bb ("bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs") was undone
> temporarily as well.
> 
> This patch manually re-adds the functionality from the original one back
> in 750e785796bb, no other functional changes intended.
> 
> Testing:
> 
>   # mount -t bpf -o uid=65534,gid=65534 bpffs ./foo
>   # ls -la . | grep foo
>   drwxrwxrwt   2 nobody nogroup          0 Dec 20 13:16 foo
>   # mount -t bpf
>   bpffs on /root/foo type bpf (rw,relatime,uid=65534,gid=65534)
> 
> Also, passing invalid arguments for uid/gid are properly rejected as expected.
> 
> Fixes: d17aff807f84 ("Revert BPF token-related functionality")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jie Jiang <jiejiang@chromium.org>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> ---

Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Dec. 21, 2023, 1:30 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>:

On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 14:38:05 +0100 you wrote:
> For a clean, conflict-free revert of the token-related patches in commit
> d17aff807f84 ("Revert BPF token-related functionality"), the bpf fs commit
> 750e785796bb ("bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs") was undone
> temporarily as well.
> 
> This patch manually re-adds the functionality from the original one back
> in 750e785796bb, no other functional changes intended.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: Re-support uid and gid when mounting bpffs
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/b08c8fc0411d

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
index 1aafb2ff2e95..41e0a55c35f5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
@@ -599,8 +599,15 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(bpf_prog_get_type_path);
  */
 static int bpf_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
 {
-	umode_t mode = d_inode(root)->i_mode & S_IALLUGO & ~S_ISVTX;
-
+	struct inode *inode = d_inode(root);
+	umode_t mode = inode->i_mode & S_IALLUGO & ~S_ISVTX;
+
+	if (!uid_eq(inode->i_uid, GLOBAL_ROOT_UID))
+		seq_printf(m, ",uid=%u",
+			   from_kuid_munged(&init_user_ns, inode->i_uid));
+	if (!gid_eq(inode->i_gid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID))
+		seq_printf(m, ",gid=%u",
+			   from_kgid_munged(&init_user_ns, inode->i_gid));
 	if (mode != S_IRWXUGO)
 		seq_printf(m, ",mode=%o", mode);
 	return 0;
@@ -625,15 +632,21 @@  static const struct super_operations bpf_super_ops = {
 };
 
 enum {
+	OPT_UID,
+	OPT_GID,
 	OPT_MODE,
 };
 
 static const struct fs_parameter_spec bpf_fs_parameters[] = {
+	fsparam_u32	("uid",				OPT_UID),
+	fsparam_u32	("gid",				OPT_GID),
 	fsparam_u32oct	("mode",			OPT_MODE),
 	{}
 };
 
 struct bpf_mount_opts {
+	kuid_t uid;
+	kgid_t gid;
 	umode_t mode;
 };
 
@@ -641,6 +654,8 @@  static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
 {
 	struct bpf_mount_opts *opts = fc->fs_private;
 	struct fs_parse_result result;
+	kuid_t uid;
+	kgid_t gid;
 	int opt;
 
 	opt = fs_parse(fc, bpf_fs_parameters, param, &result);
@@ -662,12 +677,42 @@  static int bpf_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
 	}
 
 	switch (opt) {
+	case OPT_UID:
+		uid = make_kuid(current_user_ns(), result.uint_32);
+		if (!uid_valid(uid))
+			goto bad_value;
+
+		/*
+		 * The requested uid must be representable in the
+		 * filesystem's idmapping.
+		 */
+		if (!kuid_has_mapping(fc->user_ns, uid))
+			goto bad_value;
+
+		opts->uid = uid;
+		break;
+	case OPT_GID:
+		gid = make_kgid(current_user_ns(), result.uint_32);
+		if (!gid_valid(gid))
+			goto bad_value;
+
+		/*
+		 * The requested gid must be representable in the
+		 * filesystem's idmapping.
+		 */
+		if (!kgid_has_mapping(fc->user_ns, gid))
+			goto bad_value;
+
+		opts->gid = gid;
+		break;
 	case OPT_MODE:
 		opts->mode = result.uint_32 & S_IALLUGO;
 		break;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
+bad_value:
+	return invalfc(fc, "Bad value for '%s'", param->key);
 }
 
 struct bpf_preload_ops *bpf_preload_ops;
@@ -750,6 +795,8 @@  static int bpf_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct fs_context *fc)
 	sb->s_op = &bpf_super_ops;
 
 	inode = sb->s_root->d_inode;
+	inode->i_uid = opts->uid;
+	inode->i_gid = opts->gid;
 	inode->i_op = &bpf_dir_iops;
 	inode->i_mode &= ~S_IALLUGO;
 	populate_bpffs(sb->s_root);
@@ -785,6 +832,8 @@  static int bpf_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	opts->mode = S_IRWXUGO;
+	opts->uid = current_fsuid();
+	opts->gid = current_fsgid();
 
 	fc->fs_private = opts;
 	fc->ops = &bpf_context_ops;