diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v16,04/14] bpf: add struct_ops_tab to btf.

Message ID 20240118014930.1992551-5-thinker.li@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Registrating struct_ops types from modules | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to bpf-next
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 fail Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary

Commit Message

Kui-Feng Lee Jan. 18, 2024, 1:49 a.m. UTC 
From: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>

Maintain a registry of registered struct_ops types in the per-btf (module)
struct_ops_tab. This registry allows for easy lookup of struct_ops types
that are registered by a specific module.

It is a preparation work for supporting kernel module struct_ops in a
latter patch. Each struct_ops will be registered under its own kernel
module btf and will be stored in the newly added btf->struct_ops_tab. The
bpf verifier and bpf syscall (e.g. prog and map cmd) can find the
struct_ops and its btf type/size/id... information from
btf->struct_ops_tab.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/btf.h |  2 ++
 kernel/bpf/btf.c    | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 64 insertions(+)

Comments

Martin KaFai Lau Jan. 18, 2024, 9:36 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 1/17/24 5:49 PM, thinker.li@gmail.com wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
> index 1d852dad7473..a68604904f4e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/btf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/btf.h
> @@ -584,4 +584,6 @@ static inline bool btf_type_is_struct_ptr(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
>   	return btf_type_is_struct(t);
>   }
>   
> +struct bpf_struct_ops_desc;

A forward declaration at the end of a .h file is suspicious....
Not needed also?

> +
>   #endif
Kui-Feng Lee Jan. 19, 2024, 1:13 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 1/18/24 13:36, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 1/17/24 5:49 PM, thinker.li@gmail.com wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
>> index 1d852dad7473..a68604904f4e 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/btf.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/btf.h
>> @@ -584,4 +584,6 @@ static inline bool btf_type_is_struct_ptr(struct 
>> btf *btf, const struct btf_type
>>       return btf_type_is_struct(t);
>>   }
>> +struct bpf_struct_ops_desc;
> 
> A forward declaration at the end of a .h file is suspicious....
> Not needed also?

I will remove it.

> 
>> +
>>   #endif
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/btf.h b/include/linux/btf.h
index 1d852dad7473..a68604904f4e 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf.h
@@ -584,4 +584,6 @@  static inline bool btf_type_is_struct_ptr(struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type
 	return btf_type_is_struct(t);
 }
 
+struct bpf_struct_ops_desc;
+
 #endif
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 1f94c250ab49..3fa84c44b882 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -241,6 +241,12 @@  struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc_tab {
 	struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc dtors[];
 };
 
+struct btf_struct_ops_tab {
+	u32 cnt;
+	u32 capacity;
+	struct bpf_struct_ops_desc ops[];
+};
+
 struct btf {
 	void *data;
 	struct btf_type **types;
@@ -258,6 +264,7 @@  struct btf {
 	struct btf_kfunc_set_tab *kfunc_set_tab;
 	struct btf_id_dtor_kfunc_tab *dtor_kfunc_tab;
 	struct btf_struct_metas *struct_meta_tab;
+	struct btf_struct_ops_tab *struct_ops_tab;
 
 	/* split BTF support */
 	struct btf *base_btf;
@@ -1688,11 +1695,20 @@  static void btf_free_struct_meta_tab(struct btf *btf)
 	btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL;
 }
 
+static void btf_free_struct_ops_tab(struct btf *btf)
+{
+	struct btf_struct_ops_tab *tab = btf->struct_ops_tab;
+
+	kfree(tab);
+	btf->struct_ops_tab = NULL;
+}
+
 static void btf_free(struct btf *btf)
 {
 	btf_free_struct_meta_tab(btf);
 	btf_free_dtor_kfunc_tab(btf);
 	btf_free_kfunc_set_tab(btf);
+	btf_free_struct_ops_tab(btf);
 	kvfree(btf->types);
 	kvfree(btf->resolved_sizes);
 	kvfree(btf->resolved_ids);
@@ -8471,3 +8487,49 @@  bool btf_type_ids_nocast_alias(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 
 	return !strncmp(reg_name, arg_name, cmp_len);
 }
+
+static int
+btf_add_struct_ops(struct btf *btf, struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops)
+{
+	struct btf_struct_ops_tab *tab, *new_tab;
+	int i;
+
+	if (!btf)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	/* Assume this function is called for a module when the module is
+	 * loading.
+	 */
+
+	tab = btf->struct_ops_tab;
+	if (!tab) {
+		tab = kzalloc(offsetof(struct btf_struct_ops_tab, ops[4]),
+			      GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!tab)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		tab->capacity = 4;
+		btf->struct_ops_tab = tab;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < tab->cnt; i++)
+		if (tab->ops[i].st_ops == st_ops)
+			return -EEXIST;
+
+	if (tab->cnt == tab->capacity) {
+		new_tab = krealloc(tab,
+				   offsetof(struct btf_struct_ops_tab,
+					    ops[tab->capacity * 2]),
+				   GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!new_tab)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		tab = new_tab;
+		tab->capacity *= 2;
+		btf->struct_ops_tab = tab;
+	}
+
+	tab->ops[btf->struct_ops_tab->cnt].st_ops = st_ops;
+
+	btf->struct_ops_tab->cnt++;
+
+	return 0;
+}