diff mbox series

[PATCHv2,bpf-next,8/8] bpftool: Display cookie for kprobe multi link

Message ID 20240119110505.400573-9-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit b0dc037399b19a777d569dbd9e2e9bbd62f3b3b1
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add cookies retrieval for perf/kprobe multi links | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success SINGLE THREAD; Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 0 of 0 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa Jan. 19, 2024, 11:05 a.m. UTC
Displaying cookies for kprobe multi link, in plain mode:

  # bpftool link
  ...
  1397: kprobe_multi  prog 47532
          kretprobe.multi  func_cnt 3
          addr             cookie           func [module]
          ffffffff82b370c0 3                bpf_fentry_test1
          ffffffff82b39780 1                bpf_fentry_test2
          ffffffff82b397a0 2                bpf_fentry_test3

And in json mode:

  # bpftool link -j | jq
  ...
    {
      "id": 1397,
      "type": "kprobe_multi",
      "prog_id": 47532,
      "retprobe": true,
      "func_cnt": 3,
      "missed": 0,
      "funcs": [
        {
          "addr": 18446744071607382208,
          "func": "bpf_fentry_test1",
          "module": null,
          "cookie": 3
        },
        {
          "addr": 18446744071607392128,
          "func": "bpf_fentry_test2",
          "module": null,
          "cookie": 1
        },
        {
          "addr": 18446744071607392160,
          "func": "bpf_fentry_test3",
          "module": null,
          "cookie": 2
        }
      ]
    }

Cookie is attached to specific address, and because we sort addresses
before printing, we need to sort cookies the same way, hence adding
the struct addr_cookie to keep and sort them together.

Also adding missing dd.sym_count check to show_kprobe_multi_json.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Song Liu Jan. 19, 2024, 11:50 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Jan 19, 2024 at 3:06 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
[...]
> Cookie is attached to specific address, and because we sort addresses
> before printing, we need to sort cookies the same way, hence adding
> the struct addr_cookie to keep and sort them together.
>
> Also adding missing dd.sym_count check to show_kprobe_multi_json.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c b/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
index b66a1598b87c..afde9d0c2ea1 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/link.c
@@ -249,18 +249,44 @@  static int get_prog_info(int prog_id, struct bpf_prog_info *info)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int cmp_u64(const void *A, const void *B)
+struct addr_cookie {
+	__u64 addr;
+	__u64 cookie;
+};
+
+static int cmp_addr_cookie(const void *A, const void *B)
+{
+	const struct addr_cookie *a = A, *b = B;
+
+	if (a->addr == b->addr)
+		return 0;
+	return a->addr < b->addr ? -1 : 1;
+}
+
+static struct addr_cookie *
+get_addr_cookie_array(__u64 *addrs, __u64 *cookies, __u32 count)
 {
-	const __u64 *a = A, *b = B;
+	struct addr_cookie *data;
+	__u32 i;
 
-	return *a - *b;
+	data = calloc(count, sizeof(data[0]));
+	if (!data) {
+		p_err("mem alloc failed");
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+		data[i].addr = addrs[i];
+		data[i].cookie = cookies[i];
+	}
+	qsort(data, count, sizeof(data[0]), cmp_addr_cookie);
+	return data;
 }
 
 static void
 show_kprobe_multi_json(struct bpf_link_info *info, json_writer_t *wtr)
 {
+	struct addr_cookie *data;
 	__u32 i, j = 0;
-	__u64 *addrs;
 
 	jsonw_bool_field(json_wtr, "retprobe",
 			 info->kprobe_multi.flags & BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN);
@@ -268,14 +294,20 @@  show_kprobe_multi_json(struct bpf_link_info *info, json_writer_t *wtr)
 	jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "missed", info->kprobe_multi.missed);
 	jsonw_name(json_wtr, "funcs");
 	jsonw_start_array(json_wtr);
-	addrs = u64_to_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.addrs);
-	qsort(addrs, info->kprobe_multi.count, sizeof(addrs[0]), cmp_u64);
+	data = get_addr_cookie_array(u64_to_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.addrs),
+				     u64_to_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.cookies),
+				     info->kprobe_multi.count);
+	if (!data)
+		return;
 
 	/* Load it once for all. */
 	if (!dd.sym_count)
 		kernel_syms_load(&dd);
+	if (!dd.sym_count)
+		goto error;
+
 	for (i = 0; i < dd.sym_count; i++) {
-		if (dd.sym_mapping[i].address != addrs[j])
+		if (dd.sym_mapping[i].address != data[j].addr)
 			continue;
 		jsonw_start_object(json_wtr);
 		jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "addr", dd.sym_mapping[i].address);
@@ -287,11 +319,14 @@  show_kprobe_multi_json(struct bpf_link_info *info, json_writer_t *wtr)
 		} else {
 			jsonw_string_field(json_wtr, "module", dd.sym_mapping[i].module);
 		}
+		jsonw_uint_field(json_wtr, "cookie", data[j].cookie);
 		jsonw_end_object(json_wtr);
 		if (j++ == info->kprobe_multi.count)
 			break;
 	}
 	jsonw_end_array(json_wtr);
+error:
+	free(data);
 }
 
 static __u64 *u64_to_arr(__u64 val)
@@ -675,8 +710,8 @@  void netfilter_dump_plain(const struct bpf_link_info *info)
 
 static void show_kprobe_multi_plain(struct bpf_link_info *info)
 {
+	struct addr_cookie *data;
 	__u32 i, j = 0;
-	__u64 *addrs;
 
 	if (!info->kprobe_multi.count)
 		return;
@@ -688,21 +723,24 @@  static void show_kprobe_multi_plain(struct bpf_link_info *info)
 	printf("func_cnt %u  ", info->kprobe_multi.count);
 	if (info->kprobe_multi.missed)
 		printf("missed %llu  ", info->kprobe_multi.missed);
-	addrs = (__u64 *)u64_to_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.addrs);
-	qsort(addrs, info->kprobe_multi.count, sizeof(__u64), cmp_u64);
+	data = get_addr_cookie_array(u64_to_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.addrs),
+				     u64_to_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.cookies),
+				     info->kprobe_multi.count);
+	if (!data)
+		return;
 
 	/* Load it once for all. */
 	if (!dd.sym_count)
 		kernel_syms_load(&dd);
 	if (!dd.sym_count)
-		return;
+		goto error;
 
-	printf("\n\t%-16s %s", "addr", "func [module]");
+	printf("\n\t%-16s %-16s %s", "addr", "cookie", "func [module]");
 	for (i = 0; i < dd.sym_count; i++) {
-		if (dd.sym_mapping[i].address != addrs[j])
+		if (dd.sym_mapping[i].address != data[j].addr)
 			continue;
-		printf("\n\t%016lx %s",
-		       dd.sym_mapping[i].address, dd.sym_mapping[i].name);
+		printf("\n\t%016lx %-16llx %s",
+		       dd.sym_mapping[i].address, data[j].cookie, dd.sym_mapping[i].name);
 		if (dd.sym_mapping[i].module[0] != '\0')
 			printf(" [%s]  ", dd.sym_mapping[i].module);
 		else
@@ -711,6 +749,8 @@  static void show_kprobe_multi_plain(struct bpf_link_info *info)
 		if (j++ == info->kprobe_multi.count)
 			break;
 	}
+error:
+	free(data);
 }
 
 static void show_uprobe_multi_plain(struct bpf_link_info *info)
@@ -966,6 +1006,14 @@  static int do_show_link(int fd)
 				return -ENOMEM;
 			}
 			info.kprobe_multi.addrs = ptr_to_u64(addrs);
+			cookies = calloc(count, sizeof(__u64));
+			if (!cookies) {
+				p_err("mem alloc failed");
+				free(addrs);
+				close(fd);
+				return -ENOMEM;
+			}
+			info.kprobe_multi.cookies = ptr_to_u64(cookies);
 			goto again;
 		}
 	}