diff mbox series

[RFC,bpf-next,1/5] bpf: fix potential error return

Message ID 20240122164936.810117-2-aspsk@isovalent.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series static branches | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 fail Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success SINGLE THREAD; Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1101 this patch: 1101
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 0 of 0 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 1108 this patch: 1108
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1116 this patch: 1116
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 21 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Anton Protopopov Jan. 22, 2024, 4:49 p.m. UTC
The bpf_remove_insns() function returns WARN_ON_ONCE(error), where
error is a result of bpf_adj_branches(), and thus should be always 0
However, if for any reason it is not 0, then it will be converted to
boolean by WARN_ON_ONCE and returned to user space as 1, not an actual
error value. Fix this by returning the original err after the WARN check.

Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Jiri Olsa Jan. 30, 2024, 11:20 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:49:32PM +0000, Anton Protopopov wrote:
> The bpf_remove_insns() function returns WARN_ON_ONCE(error), where
> error is a result of bpf_adj_branches(), and thus should be always 0
> However, if for any reason it is not 0, then it will be converted to
> boolean by WARN_ON_ONCE and returned to user space as 1, not an actual
> error value. Fix this by returning the original err after the WARN check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>

nice catch

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> index fbb1d95a9b44..9ba9e0ea9c45 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> @@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
>  
>  int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt)
>  {
> +	int err;
> +
>  	/* Branch offsets can't overflow when program is shrinking, no need
>  	 * to call bpf_adj_branches(..., true) here
>  	 */
> @@ -539,7 +541,12 @@ int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt)
>  		sizeof(struct bpf_insn) * (prog->len - off - cnt));
>  	prog->len -= cnt;
>  
> -	return WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_adj_branches(prog, off, off + cnt, off, false));
> +	err = bpf_adj_branches(prog, off, off + cnt, off, false);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	return 0;

could be just 'return err'

jirka

>  }
>  
>  static void bpf_prog_kallsyms_del_subprogs(struct bpf_prog *fp)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>
Anton Protopopov Jan. 30, 2024, 12:13 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:20:06PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 04:49:32PM +0000, Anton Protopopov wrote:
> > The bpf_remove_insns() function returns WARN_ON_ONCE(error), where
> > error is a result of bpf_adj_branches(), and thus should be always 0
> > However, if for any reason it is not 0, then it will be converted to
> > boolean by WARN_ON_ONCE and returned to user space as 1, not an actual
> > error value. Fix this by returning the original err after the WARN check.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
> 
> nice catch
> 
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> 
> > ---
> >  kernel/bpf/core.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > index fbb1d95a9b44..9ba9e0ea9c45 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
> > @@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
> >  
> >  int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt)
> >  {
> > +	int err;
> > +
> >  	/* Branch offsets can't overflow when program is shrinking, no need
> >  	 * to call bpf_adj_branches(..., true) here
> >  	 */
> > @@ -539,7 +541,12 @@ int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt)
> >  		sizeof(struct bpf_insn) * (prog->len - off - cnt));
> >  	prog->len -= cnt;
> >  
> > -	return WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_adj_branches(prog, off, off + cnt, off, false));
> > +	err = bpf_adj_branches(prog, off, off + cnt, off, false);
> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
> > +	if (err)
> > +		return err;
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> 
> could be just 'return err'

Thanks.  I am inserting some code in a consequent patch in between,
so left this in this form

> jirka
> 
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void bpf_prog_kallsyms_del_subprogs(struct bpf_prog *fp)
> > -- 
> > 2.34.1
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index fbb1d95a9b44..9ba9e0ea9c45 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@  struct bpf_prog *bpf_patch_insn_single(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off,
 
 int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt)
 {
+	int err;
+
 	/* Branch offsets can't overflow when program is shrinking, no need
 	 * to call bpf_adj_branches(..., true) here
 	 */
@@ -539,7 +541,12 @@  int bpf_remove_insns(struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 off, u32 cnt)
 		sizeof(struct bpf_insn) * (prog->len - off - cnt));
 	prog->len -= cnt;
 
-	return WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_adj_branches(prog, off, off + cnt, off, false));
+	err = bpf_adj_branches(prog, off, off + cnt, off, false);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void bpf_prog_kallsyms_del_subprogs(struct bpf_prog *fp)