diff mbox series

[RFC,bpf-next,4/5] bpf: add support for an extended JA instruction

Message ID 20240122164936.810117-5-aspsk@isovalent.com (mailing list archive)
State RFC
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series static branches | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 fail Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 fail Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 fail Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 fail Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success SINGLE THREAD; Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit fail Errors and warnings before: 1817 this patch: 1817
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 0 of 0 maintainers
netdev/build_clang fail Errors and warnings before: 155 this patch: 155
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn fail Errors and warnings before: 1871 this patch: 1871
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines WARNING: Prefer 'fallthrough;' over fallthrough comment WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 98 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Anton Protopopov Jan. 22, 2024, 4:49 p.m. UTC
Add support for a new version of JA instruction, a static branch JA. Such
instructions may either jump to the specified offset or act as nops. To
distinguish such instructions from normal JA the BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA flag
should be set for the SRC register.

By default on program load such instructions are jitted as a normal JA.
However, if the BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_NOP flag is set in the SRC register,
then the instruction is jitted to a NOP.

In order to generate BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA instructions using llvm two new
instructions were added:

	asm volatile goto ("nop_or_gotol %l[label]" :::: label);

will generate the BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA|BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_NOP instuction and

	asm volatile goto ("gotol_or_nop %l[label]" :::: label);

will generate a BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA instruction, without an extra bit set.
The reason for adding two instructions is that both are required to implement
static keys functionality for BPF.

The verifier logic is extended to check both possible paths: jump and nop.

Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 19 ++++++++++++++--
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h    | 10 +++++++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c       | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 736aec2565b8..52b9de134ab3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1131,6 +1131,15 @@  static void emit_shiftx(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg, u8 src_reg, bool is64, u8 op)
 	*pprog = prog;
 }
 
+static bool is_static_ja_nop(const struct bpf_insn *insn)
+{
+	u8 code = insn->code;
+
+	return (code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_JA) || code == (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA)) &&
+	       (insn->src_reg & BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA) &&
+	       (insn->src_reg & BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_NOP);
+}
+
 #define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp)))
 
 /* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */
@@ -2016,9 +2025,15 @@  st:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
 					}
 					emit_nops(&prog, INSN_SZ_DIFF - 2);
 				}
-				EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_offset);
+				if (is_static_ja_nop(insn))
+					emit_nops(&prog, 2);
+				else
+					EMIT2(0xEB, jmp_offset);
 			} else if (is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
-				EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_offset);
+				if (is_static_ja_nop(insn))
+					emit_nops(&prog, 5);
+				else
+					EMIT1_off32(0xE9, jmp_offset);
 			} else {
 				pr_err("jmp gen bug %llx\n", jmp_offset);
 				return -EFAULT;
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 83dad9ea7a3b..43ad332ffbee 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1372,6 +1372,16 @@  struct bpf_stack_build_id {
 	};
 };
 
+/* Flags for JA insn, passed in SRC_REG */
+enum {
+	BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA  = 1 << 0,
+	BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_NOP = 1 << 1,
+};
+
+#define BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_MASK (BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA | \
+				BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_NOP)
+
+
 #define BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN 16U
 
 union bpf_attr {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index fad47044ccce..50d19755b8fb 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -15607,14 +15607,24 @@  static int visit_insn(int t, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		else
 			off = insn->imm;
 
-		/* unconditional jump with single edge */
-		ret = push_insn(t, t + off + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env);
-		if (ret)
-			return ret;
+		if (insn->src_reg & BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA) {
+			/* static branch - jump with two edges */
+			mark_prune_point(env, t);
+
+			ret = push_insn(t, t + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
 
-		mark_prune_point(env, t + off + 1);
-		mark_jmp_point(env, t + off + 1);
+			ret = push_insn(t, t + off + 1, BRANCH, env);
+		} else {
+			/* unconditional jump with single edge */
+			ret = push_insn(t, t + off + 1, FALLTHROUGH, env);
+			if (ret)
+				return ret;
 
+			mark_prune_point(env, t + off + 1);
+			mark_jmp_point(env, t + off + 1);
+		}
 		return ret;
 
 	default:
@@ -17584,8 +17594,11 @@  static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 
 				mark_reg_scratched(env, BPF_REG_0);
 			} else if (opcode == BPF_JA) {
+				struct bpf_verifier_state *other_branch;
+				u32 jmp_offset;
+
 				if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) != BPF_K ||
-				    insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0 ||
+				    (insn->src_reg & ~BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_MASK) ||
 				    insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 ||
 				    (class == BPF_JMP && insn->imm != 0) ||
 				    (class == BPF_JMP32 && insn->off != 0)) {
@@ -17594,9 +17607,21 @@  static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 				}
 
 				if (class == BPF_JMP)
-					env->insn_idx += insn->off + 1;
+					jmp_offset = insn->off + 1;
 				else
-					env->insn_idx += insn->imm + 1;
+					jmp_offset = insn->imm + 1;
+
+				/* Staic branch can either jump to +off or fall through */
+				if (insn->src_reg & BPF_STATIC_BRANCH_JA) {
+					other_branch = push_stack(env, env->insn_idx + jmp_offset,
+							env->insn_idx, false);
+					if (!other_branch)
+						return -EFAULT;
+
+					jmp_offset = 1;
+				}
+
+				env->insn_idx += jmp_offset;
 				continue;
 
 			} else if (opcode == BPF_EXIT) {