diff mbox series

[RFC,bpf-next,4/9] selftests/hid: Add test for hid_bpf_hw_output_report

Message ID 20240209-hid-bpf-sleepable-v1-4-4cc895b5adbd@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series allow HID-BPF to do device IOs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/apply fail Patch does not apply to bpf-next

Commit Message

Benjamin Tissoires Feb. 9, 2024, 1:26 p.m. UTC
This time we need to ensure uhid receives it, thus the new mutex and
condition.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c              | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c            | 24 +++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h  |  2 +
 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c
index 2cf96f818f25..a6d72c8ae7cd 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@ 
 
 #define SHOW_UHID_DEBUG 0
 
+#define min(a,b) \
+   ({ __typeof__ (a) _a = (a); \
+       __typeof__ (b) _b = (b); \
+     _a < _b ? _a : _b; })
+
 static unsigned char rdesc[] = {
 	0x06, 0x00, 0xff,	/* Usage Page (Vendor Defined Page 1) */
 	0x09, 0x21,		/* Usage (Vendor Usage 0x21) */
@@ -111,6 +116,10 @@  struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args {
 static pthread_mutex_t uhid_started_mtx = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
 static pthread_cond_t uhid_started = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
 
+static pthread_mutex_t uhid_output_mtx = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
+static pthread_cond_t uhid_output_cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
+static unsigned char output_report[10];
+
 /* no need to protect uhid_stopped, only one thread accesses it */
 static bool uhid_stopped;
 
@@ -205,6 +214,13 @@  static int uhid_event(struct __test_metadata *_metadata, int fd)
 		break;
 	case UHID_OUTPUT:
 		UHID_LOG("UHID_OUTPUT from uhid-dev");
+
+		pthread_mutex_lock(&uhid_output_mtx);
+		memcpy(output_report,
+		       ev.u.output.data,
+		       min(ev.u.output.size, sizeof(output_report)));
+		pthread_cond_signal(&uhid_output_cond);
+		pthread_mutex_unlock(&uhid_output_mtx);
 		break;
 	case UHID_GET_REPORT:
 		UHID_LOG("UHID_GET_REPORT from uhid-dev");
@@ -733,6 +749,53 @@  TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_hid_change_report)
 	ASSERT_EQ(buf[2], 0) TH_LOG("leftovers_from_previous_test");
 }
 
+/*
+ * Call hid_bpf_hw_output_report against the given uhid device,
+ * check that the program is called and does the expected.
+ */
+TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_hid_user_output_report_call)
+{
+	struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args args = {
+		.retval = -1,
+		.size = 10,
+	};
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, tattrs,
+			    .ctx_in = &args,
+			    .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+	);
+	int err, cond_err, prog_fd;
+	struct timespec time_to_wait;
+
+	LOAD_BPF;
+
+	args.hid = self->hid_id;
+	args.data[0] = 1; /* report ID */
+	args.data[1] = 2; /* report ID */
+	args.data[2] = 42; /* report ID */
+
+	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(self->skel->progs.hid_user_output_report);
+
+	pthread_mutex_lock(&uhid_output_mtx);
+
+	memset(output_report, 0, sizeof(output_report));
+	clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME, &time_to_wait);
+	time_to_wait.tv_sec += 2;
+
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &tattrs);
+	cond_err = pthread_cond_timedwait(&uhid_output_cond, &uhid_output_mtx, &time_to_wait);
+
+	ASSERT_OK(err) TH_LOG("error while calling bpf_prog_test_run_opts");
+	ASSERT_OK(cond_err) TH_LOG("error while calling waiting for the condition");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(args.retval, 3);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(output_report[0], 1);
+	ASSERT_EQ(output_report[1], 2);
+	ASSERT_EQ(output_report[2], 42);
+
+	pthread_mutex_unlock(&uhid_output_mtx);
+}
+
 /*
  * Attach hid_user_raw_request to the given uhid device,
  * call the bpf program from userspace
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c
index 1e558826b809..2c2b679a83b1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c
@@ -101,6 +101,30 @@  int hid_user_raw_request(struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args *args)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("syscall")
+int hid_user_output_report(struct hid_hw_request_syscall_args *args)
+{
+	struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx;
+	const size_t size = args->size;
+	int i, ret = 0;
+
+	if (size > sizeof(args->data))
+		return -7; /* -E2BIG */
+
+	ctx = hid_bpf_allocate_context(args->hid);
+	if (!ctx)
+		return -1; /* EPERM check */
+
+	ret = hid_bpf_hw_output_report(ctx,
+				       args->data,
+				       size);
+	args->retval = ret;
+
+	hid_bpf_release_context(ctx);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static const __u8 rdesc[] = {
 	0x05, 0x01,				/* USAGE_PAGE (Generic Desktop) */
 	0x09, 0x32,				/* USAGE (Z) */
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h
index 65e657ac1198..50c6a0d5765e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid_bpf_helpers.h
@@ -94,5 +94,7 @@  extern int hid_bpf_hw_request(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx,
 			      size_t buf__sz,
 			      enum hid_report_type type,
 			      enum hid_class_request reqtype) __ksym;
+extern int hid_bpf_hw_output_report(struct hid_bpf_ctx *ctx,
+				    __u8 *buf, size_t buf__sz) __ksym;
 
 #endif /* __HID_BPF_HELPERS_H */