Message ID | 20240219032838.91723-5-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | introduce drop reasons for tcp receive path | expand |
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:28:31 +0800 > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com> > > Like previous patch does, only moving skb drop logical code to > cookie_v6_check() for later refinement. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com> > -- > v6 > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c987d2c79e4a4655166eb8eafef473384edb37fb.camel@redhat.com/ > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL+tcoAgSjwsmFnDh_Gs9ZgMi-y5awtVx+4VhJPNRADjo7LLSA@mail.gmail.com/ > 1. take one case into consideration, behave like old days, or else it will trigger errors. > > v5 > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iKz7=1q7e8KY57Dn3ED7O=RCOfLxoHQKO4eNXnZa1OPWg@mail.gmail.com/ > 1. avoid duplication of these opt_skb tests/actions (Eric) > --- > net/ipv6/syncookies.c | 4 ++++ > net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 7 +++---- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c > index 6b9c69278819..ea0d9954a29f 100644 > --- a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c > +++ b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c > @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > struct sock *ret = sk; > __u8 rcv_wscale; > int full_space; > + SKB_DR(reason); > > if (!READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_syncookies) || > !th->ack || th->rst) > @@ -256,10 +257,13 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > ireq->ecn_ok &= cookie_ecn_ok(net, dst); > > ret = tcp_get_cookie_sock(sk, skb, req, dst); > + if (!ret) > + goto out_drop; > out: > return ret; > out_free: > reqsk_free(req); > out_drop: > + kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason); > return NULL; > } > diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > index 57b25b1fc9d9..4cfeedfb871f 100644 > --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > @@ -1653,12 +1653,11 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { > struct sock *nsk = tcp_v6_cookie_check(sk, skb); > > - if (!nsk) > - goto discard; > - > - if (nsk != sk) { > + if (nsk && nsk != sk) { > if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) > goto reset; > + } > + if (!nsk || nsk != sk) { !nsk is redundant, when nsk is NULL, nsk != sk is true. We can keep the original nsk != sk check and call tcp_child_process() only when nsk is not NULL: ---8<--- diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c index 57b25b1fc9d9..0c180bb8187f 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c @@ -1653,11 +1653,8 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { struct sock *nsk = tcp_v6_cookie_check(sk, skb); - if (!nsk) - goto discard; - if (nsk != sk) { - if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) + if (nsk && tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) goto reset; if (opt_skb) __kfree_skb(opt_skb); ---8<---
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 12:38 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com> wrote: > > From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 11:28:31 +0800 > > From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com> > > > > Like previous patch does, only moving skb drop logical code to > > cookie_v6_check() for later refinement. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com> > > -- > > v6 > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/c987d2c79e4a4655166eb8eafef473384edb37fb.camel@redhat.com/ > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL+tcoAgSjwsmFnDh_Gs9ZgMi-y5awtVx+4VhJPNRADjo7LLSA@mail.gmail.com/ > > 1. take one case into consideration, behave like old days, or else it will trigger errors. > > > > v5 > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iKz7=1q7e8KY57Dn3ED7O=RCOfLxoHQKO4eNXnZa1OPWg@mail.gmail.com/ > > 1. avoid duplication of these opt_skb tests/actions (Eric) > > --- > > net/ipv6/syncookies.c | 4 ++++ > > net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 7 +++---- > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c > > index 6b9c69278819..ea0d9954a29f 100644 > > --- a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c > > +++ b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c > > @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > > struct sock *ret = sk; > > __u8 rcv_wscale; > > int full_space; > > + SKB_DR(reason); > > > > if (!READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_syncookies) || > > !th->ack || th->rst) > > @@ -256,10 +257,13 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > > ireq->ecn_ok &= cookie_ecn_ok(net, dst); > > > > ret = tcp_get_cookie_sock(sk, skb, req, dst); > > + if (!ret) > > + goto out_drop; > > out: > > return ret; > > out_free: > > reqsk_free(req); > > out_drop: > > + kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason); > > return NULL; > > } > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > > index 57b25b1fc9d9..4cfeedfb871f 100644 > > --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > > +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > > @@ -1653,12 +1653,11 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > > if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { > > struct sock *nsk = tcp_v6_cookie_check(sk, skb); > > > > - if (!nsk) > > - goto discard; > > - > > - if (nsk != sk) { > > + if (nsk && nsk != sk) { > > if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) > > goto reset; > > + } > > + if (!nsk || nsk != sk) { > > !nsk is redundant, when nsk is NULL, nsk != sk is true. > > We can keep the original nsk != sk check and call tcp_child_process() > only when nsk is not NULL: > > ---8<--- > diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > index 57b25b1fc9d9..0c180bb8187f 100644 > --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c > @@ -1653,11 +1653,8 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) > if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { > struct sock *nsk = tcp_v6_cookie_check(sk, skb); > > - if (!nsk) > - goto discard; > - > if (nsk != sk) { > - if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) > + if (nsk && tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) > goto reset; > if (opt_skb) > __kfree_skb(opt_skb); > ---8<--- Agreed. It looks much better. I'll take it. Thanks!
diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c index 6b9c69278819..ea0d9954a29f 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c +++ b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c @@ -177,6 +177,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) struct sock *ret = sk; __u8 rcv_wscale; int full_space; + SKB_DR(reason); if (!READ_ONCE(net->ipv4.sysctl_tcp_syncookies) || !th->ack || th->rst) @@ -256,10 +257,13 @@ struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) ireq->ecn_ok &= cookie_ecn_ok(net, dst); ret = tcp_get_cookie_sock(sk, skb, req, dst); + if (!ret) + goto out_drop; out: return ret; out_free: reqsk_free(req); out_drop: + kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason); return NULL; } diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c index 57b25b1fc9d9..4cfeedfb871f 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c @@ -1653,12 +1653,11 @@ int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) { struct sock *nsk = tcp_v6_cookie_check(sk, skb); - if (!nsk) - goto discard; - - if (nsk != sk) { + if (nsk && nsk != sk) { if (tcp_child_process(sk, nsk, skb)) goto reset; + } + if (!nsk || nsk != sk) { if (opt_skb) __kfree_skb(opt_skb); return 0;