diff mbox series

[net-next,v6,05/11] tcp: use drop reasons in cookie check for ipv6

Message ID 20240219032838.91723-6-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series introduce drop reasons for tcp receive path | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for net-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 940 this patch: 940
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 5 of 5 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 957 this patch: 957
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 957 this patch: 957
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 44 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/contest pending net-next-2024-02-19--09-00 (tests: 391)

Commit Message

Jason Xing Feb. 19, 2024, 3:28 a.m. UTC
From: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>

Like what I did to ipv4 mode, refine this part: adding more drop
reasons for better tracing.

Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>
--
v6:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240215210922.19969-1-kuniyu@amazon.com/
1. Not use NOMEM because of MPTCP (Kuniyuki). I chose to use NO_SOCKET as
an indicator which can be used as three kinds of cases to tell people that we're
unable to get a valid one. It's a relatively general reason like what we did
to TCP_FLAGS.

v5:
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89i+iELpsoea6+C-08m6+=JkneEEM=nAj-28eNtcOCkwQjw@mail.gmail.com/
1. Reuse SKB_DROP_REASON_NOMEM to handle failure of request socket allocation (Eric)
2. Reuse NO_SOCKET instead of introducing COOKIE_NOCHILD
3. Reuse IP_OUTNOROUTES instead of INVALID_DST (Eric)
---
 net/ipv6/syncookies.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
index ea0d9954a29f..8bad0a44a0a6 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/syncookies.c
@@ -190,16 +190,20 @@  struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		if (IS_ERR(req))
 			goto out;
 	}
-	if (!req)
+	if (!req) {
+		SKB_DR_SET(reason, NO_SOCKET);
 		goto out_drop;
+	}
 
 	ireq = inet_rsk(req);
 
 	ireq->ir_v6_rmt_addr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr;
 	ireq->ir_v6_loc_addr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr;
 
-	if (security_inet_conn_request(sk, skb, req))
+	if (security_inet_conn_request(sk, skb, req)) {
+		SKB_DR_SET(reason, SECURITY_HOOK);
 		goto out_free;
+	}
 
 	if (ipv6_opt_accepted(sk, skb, &TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->header.h6) ||
 	    np->rxopt.bits.rxinfo || np->rxopt.bits.rxoinfo ||
@@ -236,8 +240,10 @@  struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		security_req_classify_flow(req, flowi6_to_flowi_common(&fl6));
 
 		dst = ip6_dst_lookup_flow(net, sk, &fl6, final_p);
-		if (IS_ERR(dst))
+		if (IS_ERR(dst)) {
+			SKB_DR_SET(reason, IP_OUTNOROUTES);
 			goto out_free;
+		}
 	}
 
 	req->rsk_window_clamp = tp->window_clamp ? :dst_metric(dst, RTAX_WINDOW);
@@ -257,8 +263,10 @@  struct sock *cookie_v6_check(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	ireq->ecn_ok &= cookie_ecn_ok(net, dst);
 
 	ret = tcp_get_cookie_sock(sk, skb, req, dst);
-	if (!ret)
+	if (!ret) {
+		SKB_DR_SET(reason, NO_SOCKET);
 		goto out_drop;
+	}
 out:
 	return ret;
 out_free: