Message ID | 20240228121000.526645-4-bigeasy@linutronix.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | net: Provide SMP threads for backlog NAPI | expand |
On Wed, 2024-02-28 at 13:05 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > @@ -4736,6 +4736,26 @@ static void napi_schedule_rps(struct softnet_data *sd) > __napi_schedule_irqoff(&mysd->backlog); > } > > +void kick_defer_list_purge(unsigned int cpu) > +{ Minor nit: I guess passing directly 'sd' as an argument here would be better, but that could be a follow-up. Cheers, Paolo
On 2024-03-05 10:55:45 [+0100], Paolo Abeni wrote: > On Wed, 2024-02-28 at 13:05 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > @@ -4736,6 +4736,26 @@ static void napi_schedule_rps(struct softnet_data *sd) > > __napi_schedule_irqoff(&mysd->backlog); > > } > > > > +void kick_defer_list_purge(unsigned int cpu) > > +{ > > Minor nit: I guess passing directly 'sd' as an argument here would be > better, but that could be a follow-up. I need the CPU number in the "non-backlog threaded" case for smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, ). sd->cpu has the CPU stored but only in the CONFIG_RPS case. In the theoretical case +SMP -SYSFS we wouldn't have RPS but would need this CPU member. > Cheers, > > Paolo Sebastian
On Tue, 2024-03-05 at 11:25 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2024-03-05 10:55:45 [+0100], Paolo Abeni wrote: > > On Wed, 2024-02-28 at 13:05 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > @@ -4736,6 +4736,26 @@ static void napi_schedule_rps(struct softnet_data *sd) > > > __napi_schedule_irqoff(&mysd->backlog); > > > } > > > > > > +void kick_defer_list_purge(unsigned int cpu) > > > +{ > > > > Minor nit: I guess passing directly 'sd' as an argument here would be > > better, but that could be a follow-up. > > I need the CPU number in the "non-backlog threaded" case for > smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, ). sd->cpu has the CPU stored but > only in the CONFIG_RPS case. In the theoretical case +SMP -SYSFS we > wouldn't have RPS but would need this CPU member. To clarify: I'm suggesting passing both arguments. Cheers, Paolo
On 2024-03-05 11:36:39 [+0100], Paolo Abeni wrote: > To clarify: I'm suggesting passing both arguments. Ah. Okay. That would work. I am rebasing it so let me sneak that in. > Cheers, > > Paolo Sebastian
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h index 09023e44db4e2..fe5f4d7d397e2 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h @@ -3368,6 +3368,7 @@ static inline void dev_xmit_recursion_dec(void) __this_cpu_dec(softnet_data.xmit.recursion); } +void kick_defer_list_purge(unsigned int cpu); void __netif_schedule(struct Qdisc *q); void netif_schedule_queue(struct netdev_queue *txq); diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c index b449b60546554..aa831d40a1f54 100644 --- a/net/core/dev.c +++ b/net/core/dev.c @@ -225,7 +225,7 @@ static bool use_backlog_threads(void) static inline void rps_lock_irqsave(struct softnet_data *sd, unsigned long *flags) { - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS)) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS) || use_backlog_threads()) spin_lock_irqsave(&sd->input_pkt_queue.lock, *flags); else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) local_irq_save(*flags); @@ -233,7 +233,7 @@ static inline void rps_lock_irqsave(struct softnet_data *sd, static inline void rps_lock_irq_disable(struct softnet_data *sd) { - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS)) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS) || use_backlog_threads()) spin_lock_irq(&sd->input_pkt_queue.lock); else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) local_irq_disable(); @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static inline void rps_lock_irq_disable(struct softnet_data *sd) static inline void rps_unlock_irq_restore(struct softnet_data *sd, unsigned long *flags) { - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS)) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS) || use_backlog_threads()) spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sd->input_pkt_queue.lock, *flags); else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) local_irq_restore(*flags); @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void rps_unlock_irq_restore(struct softnet_data *sd, static inline void rps_unlock_irq_enable(struct softnet_data *sd) { - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS)) + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RPS) || use_backlog_threads()) spin_unlock_irq(&sd->input_pkt_queue.lock); else if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) local_irq_enable(); @@ -4736,6 +4736,26 @@ static void napi_schedule_rps(struct softnet_data *sd) __napi_schedule_irqoff(&mysd->backlog); } +void kick_defer_list_purge(unsigned int cpu) +{ + struct softnet_data *sd; + unsigned long flags; + + sd = &per_cpu(softnet_data, cpu); + + if (use_backlog_threads()) { + rps_lock_irqsave(sd, &flags); + + if (!__test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &sd->backlog.state)) + __napi_schedule_irqoff(&sd->backlog); + + rps_unlock_irq_restore(sd, &flags); + + } else if (!cmpxchg(&sd->defer_ipi_scheduled, 0, 1)) { + smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &sd->defer_csd); + } +} + #ifdef CONFIG_NET_FLOW_LIMIT int netdev_flow_limit_table_len __read_mostly = (1 << 12); #endif diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c index 1f918e602bc4f..0c9676157a2c1 100644 --- a/net/core/skbuff.c +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c @@ -7042,8 +7042,8 @@ nodefer: __kfree_skb(skb); /* Make sure to trigger NET_RX_SOFTIRQ on the remote CPU * if we are unlucky enough (this seems very unlikely). */ - if (unlikely(kick) && !cmpxchg(&sd->defer_ipi_scheduled, 0, 1)) - smp_call_function_single_async(cpu, &sd->defer_csd); + if (unlikely(kick)) + kick_defer_list_purge(cpu); } static void skb_splice_csum_page(struct sk_buff *skb, struct page *page,
The defer_list is a per-CPU list which is used to free skbs outside of the socket lock and on the CPU on which they have been allocated. The list is processed during NAPI callbacks so ideally the list is cleaned up. Should the amount of skbs on the list exceed a certain water mark then the softirq is triggered remotely on the target CPU by invoking a remote function call. The raise of the softirqs via a remote function call leads to waking the ksoftirqd on PREEMPT_RT which is undesired. The backlog-NAPI threads already provide the infrastructure which can be utilized to perform the cleanup of the defer_list. The NAPI state is updated with the input_pkt_queue.lock acquired. It order not to break the state, it is needed to also wake the backlog-NAPI thread with the lock held. This requires to acquire the use the lock in rps_lock_irq*() if the backlog-NAPI threads are used even with RPS disabled. Move the logic of remotely starting softirqs to clean up the defer_list into kick_defer_list_purge(). Make sure a lock is held in rps_lock_irq*() if backlog-NAPI threads are used. Schedule backlog-NAPI for defer_list cleanup if backlog-NAPI is available. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> --- include/linux/netdevice.h | 1 + net/core/dev.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---- net/core/skbuff.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)