diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,14/15] bpf: allow all printable characters in BTF DATASEC names

Message ID 20240306104529.6453-15-eddyz87@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 503012aad7f390b62854b9a48a3cdef3f9947b1e
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series libbpf: type suffixes and autocreate flag for struct_ops maps | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 946 this patch: 946
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 6 maintainers not CCed: song@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com haoluo@google.com sdf@google.com jolsa@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 957 this patch: 957
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 962 this patch: 962
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Eduard Zingerman March 6, 2024, 10:45 a.m. UTC
The intent is to allow libbpf to use SEC("?.struct_ops") to identify
struct_ops maps that are optional, e.g. like in the following BPF code:

    SEC("?.struct_ops")
    struct test_ops optional_map = { ... };

Which yields the following BTF:

    ...
    [13] DATASEC '?.struct_ops' size=0 vlen=...
    ...

To load such BTF libbpf rewrites DATASEC name before load.
After this patch the rewrite won't be necessary.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko March 6, 2024, 7:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 2:45 AM Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The intent is to allow libbpf to use SEC("?.struct_ops") to identify
> struct_ops maps that are optional, e.g. like in the following BPF code:
>
>     SEC("?.struct_ops")
>     struct test_ops optional_map = { ... };
>
> Which yields the following BTF:
>
>     ...
>     [13] DATASEC '?.struct_ops' size=0 vlen=...
>     ...
>
> To load such BTF libbpf rewrites DATASEC name before load.
> After this patch the rewrite won't be necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> ---
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> index 6ff0bd1a91d5..170d017e8e4a 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
> @@ -809,9 +809,23 @@ static bool btf_name_valid_identifier(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
>         return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset);

We should just rename __btf_name_valid() into
btf_name_valid_indentifier() and use that everywhere. Please consider
a clean up patch as a follow up, thanks!

>  }
>
> +/* Allow any printable character in DATASEC names */
>  static bool btf_name_valid_section(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
>  {
> -       return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset);
> +       /* offset must be valid */
> +       const char *src = btf_str_by_offset(btf, offset);
> +       const char *src_limit;
> +
> +       /* set a limit on identifier length */
> +       src_limit = src + KSYM_NAME_LEN;
> +       src++;
> +       while (*src && src < src_limit) {
> +               if (!isprint(*src))
> +                       return false;
> +               src++;
> +       }
> +
> +       return !*src;
>  }
>
>  static const char *__btf_name_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
> --
> 2.43.0
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 6ff0bd1a91d5..170d017e8e4a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -809,9 +809,23 @@  static bool btf_name_valid_identifier(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
 	return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset);
 }
 
+/* Allow any printable character in DATASEC names */
 static bool btf_name_valid_section(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
 {
-	return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset);
+	/* offset must be valid */
+	const char *src = btf_str_by_offset(btf, offset);
+	const char *src_limit;
+
+	/* set a limit on identifier length */
+	src_limit = src + KSYM_NAME_LEN;
+	src++;
+	while (*src && src < src_limit) {
+		if (!isprint(*src))
+			return false;
+		src++;
+	}
+
+	return !*src;
 }
 
 static const char *__btf_name_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)