From patchwork Sat Mar 16 12:23:59 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xu Kuohai X-Patchwork-Id: 13594428 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34D9518045; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 12:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710591616; cv=none; b=sXsORMyJifhH6cqTPQxCT2m0Sd1O02ADczuEHkqo4qRPEFmn8R23TwaLQWIB1d937IPsRyteMnjq1jsSsMk3W889aemRF35I+JgM35iZKmAzCOvCHCYQ0Dee3IchIRGZgwKE83GeFxc02Eag1XAtnOwftQRLGEPXT1trytxezOM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710591616; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/CxeULT5kR+RD3NSe0u40FOQAIPQdqzrfrThysSCq1k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=uZzXZpp/BvT6zDKgv7WMciyTESuUTqxhGoX3u0/Q0dy13hwFHdeT2bmo669mO631ltV9XM6t84qbOz9aMWmo9KcWXOAtekxp4HyeA3mfshd4NXZBKkKjEzsIg7i1wxkbUxNGwNhwY90ZXqrMtsKwN0C8Ooi1J73kJrUt86IVFr4= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.235]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4TxgDF2HzXz4f3n6m; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:19:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6051A0C72; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:20:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from k01.huawei.com (unknown [10.67.174.197]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgCXsQpyjvVls7GEHA--.54843S7; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:20:04 +0800 (CST) From: Xu Kuohai To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Florent Revest , Brendan Jackman , Paul Moore , James Morris , "Serge E . Hallyn" , Khadija Kamran , Casey Schaufler , Ondrej Mosnacek , Kees Cook , John Johansen , Lukas Bulwahn , Roberto Sassu , Shung-Hsi Yu Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] bpf: Fix compare error in function retval_range_within Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:23:59 +0800 Message-Id: <20240316122359.1073787-6-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20240316122359.1073787-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240316122359.1073787-1-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgCXsQpyjvVls7GEHA--.54843S7 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7uFyfWF4kKw15tF1kuw13twb_yoW8Zr1fpF 1rGr1qyw4DXr43W3yjyr4kA3yrK3Wjqw47KFWkC34Fyw15tryqgF4UKw4akrW5KrW8Ww1S vF12v3yYqa4UuaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUBSb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUAV Cq3wA2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Xr0E3s1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0 rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267 AKxVW8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E 14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7 xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Y z7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1l42xK82IYc2 Ij64vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s02 6x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r4a6rW5MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0x vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_JFI_Gr1lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4UJVWxJr1lIxAI cVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvEx4A2js IEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxUFgAwUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: 50xn30hkdlqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Xu Kuohai After checking lsm hook return range in verifier, the test case "test_progs -t test_lsm" failed, and the failure log says: libbpf: prog 'test_int_hook': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument libbpf: prog 'test_int_hook': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- 0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma, @ lsm.c:89 0: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 +24) ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-4095,smax=smax32=0) R1=ctx() [...] 24: (b4) w0 = -1 ; R0_w=0xffffffff ; int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma, @ lsm.c:89 25: (95) exit At program exit the register R0 has smin=4294967295 smax=4294967295 should have been in [-4095, 0] It can be seen that instruction "w0 = -1" zero extended -1 to 64-bit register r0, setting both smin and smax values of r0 to 4294967295. This resulted in a false reject when r0 was checked with range [-4095, 0]. Given bpf_retval_range is a 32-bit range, this patch fixes it by changing the compare between r0 and return range from 64-bit operation to 32-bit operation. Fixes: 8fa4ecd49b81 ("bpf: enforce exact retval range on subprog/callback exit") Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index c3387357bc0d..36cd13982926 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -9864,7 +9864,7 @@ static bool in_rbtree_lock_required_cb(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) static bool retval_range_within(struct bpf_retval_range range, const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { - return range.minval <= reg->smin_value && reg->smax_value <= range.maxval; + return range.minval <= reg->s32_min_value && reg->s32_max_value <= range.maxval; } static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)