@@ -847,7 +847,7 @@ void af_alg_wmem_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLIN |
EPOLLRDNORM |
EPOLLRDBAND);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(af_alg_wmem_wakeup);
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ static void af_alg_data_wakeup(struct sock *sk)
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLOUT |
EPOLLRDNORM |
EPOLLRDBAND);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -2506,6 +2506,12 @@ static inline void sk_wake_async(const struct sock *sk, int how, int band)
}
}
+static inline void sk_wake_async_rcu(const struct sock *sk, int how, int band)
+{
+ if (unlikely(sock_flag(sk, SOCK_FASYNC)))
+ sock_wake_async(rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq), how, band);
+}
+
/* Since sk_{r,w}mem_alloc sums skb->truesize, even a small frame might
* need sizeof(sk_buff) + MTU + padding, unless net driver perform copybreak.
* Note: for send buffers, TCP works better if we can build two skbs at
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void vcc_write_space(struct sock *sk)
if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible(&wq->wait);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -3338,7 +3338,7 @@ static void sock_def_error_report(struct sock *sk)
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLERR);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_IO, POLL_ERR);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_IO, POLL_ERR);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3353,7 +3353,7 @@ void sock_def_readable(struct sock *sk)
if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLPRI |
EPOLLRDNORM | EPOLLRDBAND);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -3373,7 +3373,7 @@ static void sock_def_write_space(struct sock *sk)
EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLWRBAND);
/* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -3398,7 +3398,7 @@ static void sock_def_write_space_wfree(struct sock *sk)
EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLWRBAND);
/* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
}
}
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void dccp_write_space(struct sock *sk)
wake_up_interruptible(&wq->wait);
/* Should agree with poll, otherwise some programs break */
if (sock_writeable(sk))
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -1544,7 +1544,7 @@ int __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
INDIRECT_CALL_1(sk->sk_data_ready,
sock_def_readable, sk);
else
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
}
busylock_release(busy);
return 0;
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@ static void iucv_sock_wake_msglim(struct sock *sk)
wq = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_wq);
if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_all(&wq->wait);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void rxrpc_write_space(struct sock *sk)
if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible(&wq->wait);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -9276,7 +9276,7 @@ void sctp_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLIN |
EPOLLRDNORM | EPOLLRDBAND);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@ static void smc_rx_wake_up(struct sock *sk)
if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait, EPOLLIN | EPOLLPRI |
EPOLLRDNORM | EPOLLRDBAND);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_IN);
if ((sk->sk_shutdown == SHUTDOWN_MASK) ||
(sk->sk_state == SMC_CLOSED))
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_HUP);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_WAITD, POLL_HUP);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static void unix_write_space(struct sock *sk)
if (skwq_has_sleeper(wq))
wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&wq->wait,
EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM | EPOLLWRBAND);
- sk_wake_async(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
+ sk_wake_async_rcu(sk, SOCK_WAKE_SPACE, POLL_OUT);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
While looking at UDP receive performance, I saw sk_wake_async() was no longer inlined. This matters at least on AMD Zen1-4 platforms (see SRSO) This might be because rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() are no longer nops in recent kernels ? Add sk_wake_async_rcu() variant, which must be called from contexts already holding rcu lock. As SOCK_FASYNC is deprecated in modern days, use unlikely() to give a hint to the compiler. sk_wake_async_rcu() is properly inlined from __udp_enqueue_schedule_skb() and sock_def_readable(). Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> --- crypto/af_alg.c | 4 ++-- include/net/sock.h | 6 ++++++ net/atm/common.c | 2 +- net/core/sock.c | 8 ++++---- net/dccp/output.c | 2 +- net/ipv4/udp.c | 2 +- net/iucv/af_iucv.c | 2 +- net/rxrpc/af_rxrpc.c | 2 +- net/sctp/socket.c | 2 +- net/smc/smc_rx.c | 4 ++-- net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +- 11 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)