From patchwork Tue Apr 9 10:09:29 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Jason Xing X-Patchwork-Id: 13622115 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from mail-oo1-f42.google.com (mail-oo1-f42.google.com [209.85.161.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DFC27EEF6; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:10:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.42 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712657414; cv=none; b=EaOvzJE+baXHYnYwsgpJ4dSokhfBc3rSloUS6w835KbchLL54ee16UHa6RtRkh2I1WDs8lO26DgguCiSaZLGAah18enzjlap7cv+XH51GP97Wzxnpvs1qR4lUTe+SdoP0+tMgdT5BPvre3HvCuD9mTaftA3jC2VzrtBCDtWpBeM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712657414; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mlfxcIg4+Phml4qIdFRVfQLahA9cOJbdd5MjdoBa8Vs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=uIgni6xQIX4LJECLurXeTV49nEDmftGWBUVlmpwrCvPISM3UO9jKVAqbvv4DKUlxa5DAQmevLxDvWsUoE0NPHBOW6+mEibZHHyxUHzxoUG5rftVNGmyAmqENjjyNyUJw7wNVEfegqC/MYIBuYSPI9Hmwuggynl5UObBspO7OcVs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=MtARYJJ3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.42 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="MtARYJJ3" Received: by mail-oo1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-5aa20adda1dso2032679eaf.1; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 03:10:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712657412; x=1713262212; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=PS2aNr/EX+hXSh4C6UyaT13e9lWbB8QJ2EHpJCpiGRg=; b=MtARYJJ3breDyv7AUxOTsK69nQXJmSxHvJBLbXcvvn1xCfI7JTAIqnu5FHDlpHMyp6 93/f72U0FRMXvf1LLLgpxW6lWGZvFI1k4efjmY7FV41HTMQd1nfeJ3vltZCqZYK6nVCq itQjRnyv8HuDsAp5al+W3dNDv4QdBhgJaopigYt/c9oxoQNnfwXFGg/0OtJLLBPyPrJP 0j/kg4gG8mHBhnvkxMrPIeLg2SsChq4lmWu7GyM28Tly5vHwblsNnwpS7gpOo1hqR8VW sy3MVUotQL0hfc5hzWWaMnSKFc6BIvFOJIOOMv2DzAFJ6tJxxNC+eX8Z+gQ+tpTG5zf3 4u2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712657412; x=1713262212; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PS2aNr/EX+hXSh4C6UyaT13e9lWbB8QJ2EHpJCpiGRg=; b=NssLg4KPdxQpuiAHyugykTYPe3HoqPUJgurqDApghgIQYrV8H/tRRQNW/Ff5Zvgf9k /j/g6eqAv00KCPbeCJoPpsnw6v/WdA7FoZ25aZ5pFXFFx/H6ME5mYPtVDh5/RgATPDbC lkLZzPJtCAfWuEQGH6clwMPnVI+EpCATdcoqRBN4RoidEkN1ymuBS5kywmB2o0OJpQw3 TptsGpNMlCKvDp3FGn89ZOJDRrcGGLGNF3tPr7QpnIOHK+SwRulBpRjfh9I6G2ga4Aht QqfNhDH7h/kxFWDe1HHU7vxr9jhGFUD4sx3FHe2WBHPK+IrrHd3nCM4gaFB10k7Y9naH geRg== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXQ19iUoaUodPTli+9sOyr2xU67ceNsv02uThpN6eyVdtZK02nVBHSGghyadsnG50Ua+cveivaJ4F5JhTiGbiJ9dzfWiFmVokZ7HugAeLH62Mn2b4fg/JRH2J3SiV3SzdnUNFJQMx1DrQRw X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyVve/fyJ/n3AJ6MFBPCJycHq8No+hyJI9x+8xSy5xHdp7KZUhn UwSFSgM4Adv7xHEH35ouJ5AWBZISBwB7Z3m8Fe8d07XY5bgihiEK X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGAfyUuL5DqUrOODFzjKEsh3f6feDS348foF0B094yjqIPM8WrzuwwtI8F7juk8jb+VSRXq9Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6358:c92:b0:186:1193:8ccd with SMTP id o18-20020a0563580c9200b0018611938ccdmr9710915rwj.23.1712657412155; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 03:10:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from KERNELXING-MB0.tencent.com ([111.201.26.66]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fn12-20020a056a002fcc00b006e5597994c8sm7959130pfb.5.2024.04.09.03.10.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Apr 2024 03:10:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason Xing To: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, dsahern@kernel.org, matttbe@kernel.org, martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kerneljasonxing@gmail.com, Jason Xing Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 1/6] net: introduce rstreason to detect why the RST is sent Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 18:09:29 +0800 Message-Id: <20240409100934.37725-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 In-Reply-To: <20240409100934.37725-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> References: <20240409100934.37725-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org From: Jason Xing Add a new standalone file for the easy future extension to support both active reset and passive reset in the TCP/DCCP/MPTCP protocols. This patch only does the preparations for reset reason mechanism, nothing else changes. The reset reasons are divided into three parts: 1) reuse drop reasons for passive reset in TCP 2) reuse MP_TCPRST option for MPTCP 3) our own reasons I will implement the basic codes of active/passive reset reason in those three protocols, which is not complete for this moment. But it provides a new chance to let other people add more reasons into it:) Signed-off-by: Jason Xing --- include/net/rstreason.h | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 include/net/rstreason.h diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h b/include/net/rstreason.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..24d098a78a60 --- /dev/null +++ b/include/net/rstreason.h @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */ + +#ifndef _LINUX_RSTREASON_H +#define _LINUX_RSTREASON_H +#include + +#define DEFINE_RST_REASON(FN, FNe) \ + FN(MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC) \ + FN(MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP) \ + FN(MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE) \ + FN(MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT) \ + FN(MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG) \ + FN(MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF) \ + FN(MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX) \ + FN(NOT_SPECIFIED) \ + FNe(MAX) + +#define RST_REASON_START (SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX + 1) + +/* There are three parts in order: + * 1) 0 - SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX: rely on drop reasons for passive reset in TCP + * 2) SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX + 1 - MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX: for MPTCP use + * 3) MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX - SK_RST_REASON_MAX: independent reset reason + */ +enum sk_rst_reason { + /* Leave this 'blank' part (0-SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX) for the reuse + * of skb drop reason because rst reason relies on what drop reason + * indicates exactly why it could happen. + */ + + /* Copy from include/uapi/linux/mptcp.h. + * These reset fields will not be changed since they adhere to + * RFC 8684. So do not touch them. I'm going to list each definition + * of them respectively. + */ + /* Unspecified error. + * This is the default error; it implies that the subflow is no + * longer available. The presence of this option shows that the + * RST was generated by an MPTCP-aware device. + */ + SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EUNSPEC = RST_REASON_START, + /* MPTCP-specific error. + * An error has been detected in the processing of MPTCP options. + * This is the usual reason code to return in the cases where a RST + * is being sent to close a subflow because of an invalid response. + */ + SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMPTCP, + /* Lack of resources. + * This code indicates that the sending host does not have enough + * resources to support the terminated subflow. + */ + SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_ERESOURCE, + /* Administratively prohibited. + * This code indicates that the requested subflow is prohibited by + * the policies of the sending host. + */ + SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EPROHIBIT, + /* Too much outstanding data. + * This code indicates that there is an excessive amount of data + * that needs to be transmitted over the terminated subflow while + * having already been acknowledged over one or more other subflows. + * This may occur if a path has been unavailable for a short period + * and it is more efficient to reset and start again than it is to + * retransmit the queued data. + */ + SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EWQ2BIG, + /* Unacceptable performance. + * This code indicates that the performance of this subflow was + * too low compared to the other subflows of this Multipath TCP + * connection. + */ + SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EBADPERF, + /* Middlebox interference. + * Middlebox interference has been detected over this subflow, + * making MPTCP signaling invalid. For example, this may be sent + * if the checksum does not validate. + */ + SK_RST_REASON_MPTCP_RST_EMIDDLEBOX, + + /* For the real standalone socket reset reason, we start from here */ + SK_RST_REASON_NOT_SPECIFIED, + + /* Maximum of socket reset reasons. + * It shouldn't be used as a real 'reason'. + */ + SK_RST_REASON_MAX, +}; + +static inline int convert_mptcp_reason(int reason) +{ + return reason += RST_REASON_START; +} +#endif