diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,3/7] bpf: create repeated fields for arrays.

Message ID 20240501204729.484085-4-thinker.li@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head. | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 932 this patch: 932
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 8 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com jolsa@kernel.org eddyz87@gmail.com yonghong.song@linux.dev daniel@iogearbox.net haoluo@google.com sdf@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 938 this patch: 938
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 943 this patch: 943
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 88 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Kui-Feng Lee May 1, 2024, 8:47 p.m. UTC
The verifier uses field information for certain special types, such as
kptr, rbtree root, and list head. These types are treated
differently. However, we did not previously support these types in
arrays. This update examines arrays and duplicates field information the
same number of times as the length of the array if the element type is one
of the special types.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

Eduard Zingerman May 2, 2024, 5:20 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, 2024-05-01 at 13:47 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:

I think this looks good for repeating fields of nested arrays
(w/o visiting nested structures), two nits below.

> @@ -3575,6 +3628,19 @@ static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
>  	for_each_vsi(i, t, vsi) {
>  		const struct btf_type *var = btf_type_by_id(btf, vsi->type);
>  		const struct btf_type *var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, var->type);
> +		const struct btf_array *array;
> +		u32 j, nelems = 1;
> +
> +		/* Walk into array types to find the element type and the
> +		 * number of elements in the (flattened) array.
> +		 */
> +		for (j = 0; j < MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH && btf_type_is_array(var_type); j++) {
> +			array = btf_array(var_type);
> +			nelems *= array->nelems;
> +			var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, array->type);
> +		}
> +		if (nelems == 0)
> +			continue;

Nit: Should this return an error if j == MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH after the loop?

>  
>  		field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, var_type->name_off),
>  						field_mask, &seen_mask, &align, &sz);
> @@ -3584,7 +3650,7 @@ static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
>  			return field_type;
>  
>  		off = vsi->offset;
> -		if (vsi->size != sz)
> +		if (vsi->size != sz * nelems)
>  			continue;
>  		if (off % align)
>  			continue;
> @@ -3624,9 +3690,14 @@ static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
>  
>  		if (ret == BTF_FIELD_IGNORE)
>  			continue;
> -		if (idx >= info_cnt)
> +		if (idx + nelems > info_cnt)
>  			return -E2BIG;

Nit: This is bounded by BTF_FIELDS_MAX which has value of 11,
     would that be enough?

> -		++idx;
> +		if (nelems > 1) {
> +			ret = btf_repeat_field(info, idx, nelems - 1, sz);
> +			if (ret < 0)
> +				return ret;
> +		}
> +		idx += nelems;
>  	}
>  	return idx;
>  }
Kui-Feng Lee May 3, 2024, 6:02 p.m. UTC | #2
On 5/2/24 10:20, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-05-01 at 13:47 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> 
> I think this looks good for repeating fields of nested arrays
> (w/o visiting nested structures), two nits below.
> 
>> @@ -3575,6 +3628,19 @@ static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
>>   	for_each_vsi(i, t, vsi) {
>>   		const struct btf_type *var = btf_type_by_id(btf, vsi->type);
>>   		const struct btf_type *var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, var->type);
>> +		const struct btf_array *array;
>> +		u32 j, nelems = 1;
>> +
>> +		/* Walk into array types to find the element type and the
>> +		 * number of elements in the (flattened) array.
>> +		 */
>> +		for (j = 0; j < MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH && btf_type_is_array(var_type); j++) {
>> +			array = btf_array(var_type);
>> +			nelems *= array->nelems;
>> +			var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, array->type);
>> +		}
>> +		if (nelems == 0)
>> +			continue;
> 
> Nit: Should this return an error if j == MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH after the loop?

agree


> 
>>   
>>   		field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, var_type->name_off),
>>   						field_mask, &seen_mask, &align, &sz);
>> @@ -3584,7 +3650,7 @@ static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
>>   			return field_type;
>>   
>>   		off = vsi->offset;
>> -		if (vsi->size != sz)
>> +		if (vsi->size != sz * nelems)
>>   			continue;
>>   		if (off % align)
>>   			continue;
>> @@ -3624,9 +3690,14 @@ static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
>>   
>>   		if (ret == BTF_FIELD_IGNORE)
>>   			continue;
>> -		if (idx >= info_cnt)
>> +		if (idx + nelems > info_cnt)
>>   			return -E2BIG;
> 
> Nit: This is bounded by BTF_FIELDS_MAX which has value of 11,
>       would that be enough?

So far, no one has complained it yet!
But, some one will reach the limit in future.
If people want a flexible length, I will solve it in a follow-up.
WDYT?

> 
>> -		++idx;
>> +		if (nelems > 1) {
>> +			ret = btf_repeat_field(info, idx, nelems - 1, sz);
>> +			if (ret < 0)
>> +				return ret;
>> +		}
>> +		idx += nelems;
>>   	}
>>   	return idx;
>>   }
> 
>
Eduard Zingerman May 3, 2024, 6:10 p.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, 2024-05-03 at 11:02 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:

[...]

> > > @@ -3624,9 +3690,14 @@ static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
> > >   
> > >   		if (ret == BTF_FIELD_IGNORE)
> > >   			continue;
> > > -		if (idx >= info_cnt)
> > > +		if (idx + nelems > info_cnt)
> > >   			return -E2BIG;
> > 
> > Nit: This is bounded by BTF_FIELDS_MAX which has value of 11,
> >       would that be enough?
> 
> So far, no one has complained it yet!
> But, some one will reach the limit in future.
> If people want a flexible length, I will solve it in a follow-up.
> WDYT?

Sure, follow-up works.
Just that 11 is not much for an array.
I think sched_ext is the only user for this feature at the moment,
so you are in the best position to judge which size is appropriate.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index d4c3342e2027..4a78cd28fab0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3493,6 +3493,41 @@  static int btf_get_field_type(const char *name, u32 field_mask, u32 *seen_mask,
 
 #undef field_mask_test_name
 
+/* Repeat a field for a specified number of times.
+ *
+ * Copy and repeat a field for repeat_cnt
+ * times. The field is repeated by adding the offset of each field
+ * with
+ *   (i + 1) * elem_size
+ * where i is the repeat index and elem_size is the size of the element.
+ */
+static int btf_repeat_field(struct btf_field_info *info, u32 field,
+			    u32 repeat_cnt, u32 elem_size)
+{
+	u32 i;
+	u32 cur;
+
+	/* Ensure not repeating fields that should not be repeated. */
+	switch (info[field].type) {
+	case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
+	case BPF_KPTR_REF:
+	case BPF_KPTR_PERCPU:
+	case BPF_LIST_HEAD:
+	case BPF_RB_ROOT:
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	cur = field + 1;
+	for (i = 0; i < repeat_cnt; i++) {
+		memcpy(&info[cur], &info[field], sizeof(info[0]));
+		info[cur++].off += (i + 1) * elem_size;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int btf_find_struct_field(const struct btf *btf,
 				 const struct btf_type *t, u32 field_mask,
 				 struct btf_field_info *info, int info_cnt)
@@ -3505,6 +3540,19 @@  static int btf_find_struct_field(const struct btf *btf,
 	for_each_member(i, t, member) {
 		const struct btf_type *member_type = btf_type_by_id(btf,
 								    member->type);
+		const struct btf_array *array;
+		u32 j, nelems = 1;
+
+		/* Walk into array types to find the element type and the
+		 * number of elements in the (flattened) array.
+		 */
+		for (j = 0; j < MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH && btf_type_is_array(member_type); j++) {
+			array = btf_array(member_type);
+			nelems *= array->nelems;
+			member_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, array->type);
+		}
+		if (nelems == 0)
+			continue;
 
 		field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, member_type->name_off),
 						field_mask, &seen_mask, &align, &sz);
@@ -3556,9 +3604,14 @@  static int btf_find_struct_field(const struct btf *btf,
 
 		if (ret == BTF_FIELD_IGNORE)
 			continue;
-		if (idx >= info_cnt)
+		if (idx + nelems > info_cnt)
 			return -E2BIG;
-		++idx;
+		if (nelems > 1) {
+			ret = btf_repeat_field(info, idx, nelems - 1, sz);
+			if (ret < 0)
+				return ret;
+		}
+		idx += nelems;
 	}
 	return idx;
 }
@@ -3575,6 +3628,19 @@  static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 	for_each_vsi(i, t, vsi) {
 		const struct btf_type *var = btf_type_by_id(btf, vsi->type);
 		const struct btf_type *var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, var->type);
+		const struct btf_array *array;
+		u32 j, nelems = 1;
+
+		/* Walk into array types to find the element type and the
+		 * number of elements in the (flattened) array.
+		 */
+		for (j = 0; j < MAX_RESOLVE_DEPTH && btf_type_is_array(var_type); j++) {
+			array = btf_array(var_type);
+			nelems *= array->nelems;
+			var_type = btf_type_by_id(btf, array->type);
+		}
+		if (nelems == 0)
+			continue;
 
 		field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, var_type->name_off),
 						field_mask, &seen_mask, &align, &sz);
@@ -3584,7 +3650,7 @@  static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 			return field_type;
 
 		off = vsi->offset;
-		if (vsi->size != sz)
+		if (vsi->size != sz * nelems)
 			continue;
 		if (off % align)
 			continue;
@@ -3624,9 +3690,14 @@  static int btf_find_datasec_var(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 
 		if (ret == BTF_FIELD_IGNORE)
 			continue;
-		if (idx >= info_cnt)
+		if (idx + nelems > info_cnt)
 			return -E2BIG;
-		++idx;
+		if (nelems > 1) {
+			ret = btf_repeat_field(info, idx, nelems - 1, sz);
+			if (ret < 0)
+				return ret;
+		}
+		idx += nelems;
 	}
 	return idx;
 }