diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Update tests for new ct zone opts for nf_conntrack kfuncs

Message ID 20240508050450.88356-1-brad@faucet.nz (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v3,1/2] net: netfilter: Make ct zone opts configurable for bpf ct helpers | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Brad Cowie May 8, 2024, 5:04 a.m. UTC 
Add test for allocating and looking up ct entry in a
non-default ct zone with kfuncs bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_alloc
and bpf_{xdp,skb}_ct_lookup.

Add negative tests for looking up ct entry in a different
ct zone to where it was allocated and with a different
direction.

Signed-off-by: Brad Cowie <brad@faucet.nz>
---
v2 -> v3:
  - Test both old and new bpf_ct_opts struct definitions
  - Restore test for reserved options
  - Add test for ct_zone_dir

v1 -> v2:
  - Separate test changes into different patch
  - Add test for allocating/looking up entry in non-default ct zone
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config            |   1 +
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c |   6 +
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++--
 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Martin KaFai Lau May 20, 2024, 11:52 p.m. UTC | #1 
On 5/7/24 10:04 PM, Brad Cowie wrote:
> @@ -84,16 +102,6 @@ nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
>   	else
>   		test_einval_bpf_tuple = opts_def.error;
>   
> -	opts_def.reserved[0] = 1;
> -	ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
> -		       sizeof(opts_def));
> -	opts_def.reserved[0] = 0;
> -	opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
> -	if (ct)
> -		bpf_ct_release(ct);
> -	else
> -		test_einval_reserved = opts_def.error;
> -
>   	opts_def.netns_id = -2;
>   	ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,

This non-zero reserved[0] test is still valid and useful. How about create a new 
test_einval_reserved_new for testing the new struct?

pw-bot: cr

[ Sorry for the delay. I have some backlog. ].
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
index eeabd798bc3a..2fb16da78dce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@  CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_CT=y
 CONFIG_NETKIT=y
 CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=y
 CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK=y
+CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_ZONES=y
 CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV4=y
 CONFIG_NF_DEFRAG_IPV6=y
 CONFIG_NF_NAT=y
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
index b30ff6b3b81a..b73401a71e4a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_nf.c
@@ -122,6 +122,12 @@  static void test_bpf_nf_ct(int mode)
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_exist_lookup_mark, 43, "Test existing connection lookup ctmark");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_snat_addr, 0, "Test for source natting");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_dnat_addr, 0, "Test for destination natting");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_ct_zone_id_alloc_entry, 0, "Test for alloc new entry in specified ct zone");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_ct_zone_id_insert_entry, 0, "Test for insert new entry in specified ct zone");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->data->test_ct_zone_id_succ_lookup, 0, "Test for successful lookup in specified ct_zone");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_ct_zone_dir_enoent_lookup, -ENOENT, "Test ENOENT for lookup with wrong ct zone dir");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_ct_zone_id_enoent_lookup, -ENOENT, "Test ENOENT for lookup in wrong ct zone");
+
 end:
 	if (client_fd != -1)
 		close(client_fd);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
index 77ad8adf68da..f57cd5d6d548 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_bpf_nf.c
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ 
 #define EINVAL 22
 #define ENOENT 2
 
+#define NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_ORIG (1 << IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL)
+#define NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_REPL (1 << IP_CT_DIR_REPLY)
+
 extern unsigned long CONFIG_HZ __kconfig;
 
 int test_einval_bpf_tuple = 0;
@@ -22,6 +25,11 @@  int test_eafnosupport = 0;
 int test_alloc_entry = -EINVAL;
 int test_insert_entry = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
 int test_succ_lookup = -ENOENT;
+int test_ct_zone_id_alloc_entry = -EINVAL;
+int test_ct_zone_id_insert_entry = -EAFNOSUPPORT;
+int test_ct_zone_id_succ_lookup = -ENOENT;
+int test_ct_zone_dir_enoent_lookup = 0;
+int test_ct_zone_id_enoent_lookup = 0;
 u32 test_delta_timeout = 0;
 u32 test_status = 0;
 u32 test_insert_lookup_mark = 0;
@@ -48,6 +56,16 @@  struct bpf_ct_opts___local {
 	u8 reserved[3];
 } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
 
+struct bpf_ct_opts___new {
+	s32 netns_id;
+	s32 error;
+	u8 l4proto;
+	u8 dir;
+	u16 ct_zone_id;
+	u8 ct_zone_dir;
+	u8 reserved[3];
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
 struct nf_conn *bpf_xdp_ct_alloc(struct xdp_md *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
 				 struct bpf_ct_opts___local *, u32) __ksym;
 struct nf_conn *bpf_xdp_ct_lookup(struct xdp_md *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
@@ -84,16 +102,6 @@  nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
 	else
 		test_einval_bpf_tuple = opts_def.error;
 
-	opts_def.reserved[0] = 1;
-	ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
-		       sizeof(opts_def));
-	opts_def.reserved[0] = 0;
-	opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
-	if (ct)
-		bpf_ct_release(ct);
-	else
-		test_einval_reserved = opts_def.error;
-
 	opts_def.netns_id = -2;
 	ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
 		       sizeof(opts_def));
@@ -220,10 +228,98 @@  nf_ct_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
 	}
 }
 
+static __always_inline void
+nf_ct_opts_new_test(struct nf_conn *(*lookup_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+						 struct bpf_ct_opts___new *, u32),
+		    struct nf_conn *(*alloc_fn)(void *, struct bpf_sock_tuple *, u32,
+						struct bpf_ct_opts___new *, u32),
+		    void *ctx)
+{
+	struct bpf_ct_opts___new opts_def = { .l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP, .netns_id = -1 };
+	struct bpf_sock_tuple bpf_tuple;
+	struct nf_conn *ct;
+
+	__builtin_memset(&bpf_tuple, 0, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4));
+
+	opts_def.reserved[0] = 1;
+	ct = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+		       sizeof(opts_def));
+	opts_def.reserved[0] = 0;
+	opts_def.l4proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
+	if (ct)
+		bpf_ct_release(ct);
+	else
+		test_einval_reserved = opts_def.error;
+
+	bpf_tuple.ipv4.saddr = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* src IP */
+	bpf_tuple.ipv4.daddr = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* dst IP */
+	bpf_tuple.ipv4.sport = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* src port */
+	bpf_tuple.ipv4.dport = bpf_get_prandom_u32(); /* dst port */
+
+	/* use non-default ct zone */
+	opts_def.ct_zone_id = 10;
+	opts_def.ct_zone_dir = NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_ORIG;
+	ct = alloc_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4), &opts_def,
+		      sizeof(opts_def));
+	if (ct) {
+		__u16 sport = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+		__u16 dport = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+		union nf_inet_addr saddr = {};
+		union nf_inet_addr daddr = {};
+		struct nf_conn *ct_ins;
+
+		bpf_ct_set_timeout(ct, 10000);
+
+		/* snat */
+		saddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+		bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &saddr, sport, NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC___local);
+		/* dnat */
+		daddr.ip = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
+		bpf_ct_set_nat_info(ct, &daddr, dport, NF_NAT_MANIP_DST___local);
+
+		ct_ins = bpf_ct_insert_entry(ct);
+		if (ct_ins) {
+			struct nf_conn *ct_lk;
+
+			/* entry should exist in same ct zone we inserted it */
+			ct_lk = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4),
+					  &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+			if (ct_lk) {
+				bpf_ct_release(ct_lk);
+				test_ct_zone_id_succ_lookup = 0;
+			}
+
+			/* entry should not exist with wrong direction */
+			opts_def.ct_zone_dir = NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_REPL;
+			ct_lk = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4),
+					  &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+			opts_def.ct_zone_dir = NF_CT_ZONE_DIR_ORIG;
+			if (ct_lk)
+				bpf_ct_release(ct_lk);
+			else
+				test_ct_zone_dir_enoent_lookup = opts_def.error;
+
+			/* entry should not exist in default ct zone */
+			opts_def.ct_zone_id = 0;
+			ct_lk = lookup_fn(ctx, &bpf_tuple, sizeof(bpf_tuple.ipv4),
+					  &opts_def, sizeof(opts_def));
+			if (ct_lk)
+				bpf_ct_release(ct_lk);
+			else
+				test_ct_zone_id_enoent_lookup = opts_def.error;
+
+			bpf_ct_release(ct_ins);
+			test_ct_zone_id_insert_entry = 0;
+		}
+		test_ct_zone_id_alloc_entry = 0;
+	}
+}
+
 SEC("xdp")
 int nf_xdp_ct_test(struct xdp_md *ctx)
 {
 	nf_ct_test((void *)bpf_xdp_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_xdp_ct_alloc, ctx);
+	nf_ct_opts_new_test((void *)bpf_xdp_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_xdp_ct_alloc, ctx);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -231,6 +327,7 @@  SEC("tc")
 int nf_skb_ct_test(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 {
 	nf_ct_test((void *)bpf_skb_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_skb_ct_alloc, ctx);
+	nf_ct_opts_new_test((void *)bpf_skb_ct_lookup, (void *)bpf_skb_ct_alloc, ctx);
 	return 0;
 }