diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,5/9] bpf: look into the types of the fields of a struct type recursively.

Message ID 20240508063218.2806447-6-thinker.li@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Enable BPF programs to declare arrays of kptr, bpf_rb_root, and bpf_list_head. | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Kui-Feng Lee May 8, 2024, 6:32 a.m. UTC
The verifier has field information for specific special types, such as
kptr, rbtree root, and list head. These types are handled
differently. However, we did not previously examine the types of fields of
a struct type variable. Field information records were not generated for
the kptrs, rbtree roots, and linked_list heads that are not located at the
outermost struct type of a variable.

For example,

  struct A {
    struct task_struct __kptr * task;
  };

  struct B {
    struct A mem_a;
  }

  struct B var_b;

It did not examine "struct A" so as not to generate field information for
the kptr in "struct A" for "var_b".

This patch enables BPF programs to define fields of these special types in
a struct type other than the direct type of a variable or in a struct type
that is the type of a field in the value type of a map.

Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Eduard Zingerman May 10, 2024, 2:36 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 23:32 -0700, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
> The verifier has field information for specific special types, such as
> kptr, rbtree root, and list head. These types are handled
> differently. However, we did not previously examine the types of fields of
> a struct type variable. Field information records were not generated for
> the kptrs, rbtree roots, and linked_list heads that are not located at the
> outermost struct type of a variable.
> 
> For example,
> 
>   struct A {
>     struct task_struct __kptr * task;
>   };
> 
>   struct B {
>     struct A mem_a;
>   }
> 
>   struct B var_b;
> 
> It did not examine "struct A" so as not to generate field information for
> the kptr in "struct A" for "var_b".
> 
> This patch enables BPF programs to define fields of these special types in
> a struct type other than the direct type of a variable or in a struct type
> that is the type of a field in the value type of a map.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

[...]

> @@ -3555,6 +3597,17 @@ static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
>  
>  	field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, var_type->name_off),
>  					field_mask, seen_mask, &align, &sz);
> +	/* Look into variables of struct types */
> +	if ((field_type == BPF_KPTR_REF || !field_type) &&
> +	    __btf_type_is_struct(var_type)) {

Nit: this check looks a bit ugly, but I can't suggest a good
     refactoring for btf_get_field_type() at the moment.

> +		sz = var_type->size;
> +		if (expected_size && expected_size != sz * nelems)
> +			return 0;
> +		ret = btf_find_nested_struct(btf, var_type, off, nelems, field_mask,
> +					     &info[0], info_cnt);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (field_type == 0)
>  		return 0;
>  	if (field_type < 0)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 633c3e037cef..bbda24299be2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3494,41 +3494,83 @@  static int btf_get_field_type(const char *name, u32 field_mask, u32 *seen_mask,
 
 #undef field_mask_test_name
 
-/* Repeat a field for a specified number of times.
+/* Repeat a number of fields for a specified number of times.
  *
- * Copy and repeat the first field for repeat_cnt
- * times. The field is repeated by adding the offset of each field
- * with
+ * Copy the fields starting from the first field and repeat them for
+ * repeat_cnt times. The fields are repeated by adding the offset of each
+ * field with
  *   (i + 1) * elem_size
  * where i is the repeat index and elem_size is the size of an element.
  */
-static int btf_repeat_field(struct btf_field_info *info,
-			    u32 repeat_cnt, u32 elem_size)
+static int btf_repeat_fields(struct btf_field_info *info,
+			     u32 field_cnt, u32 repeat_cnt, u32 elem_size)
 {
-	u32 i;
+	u32 i, j;
 	u32 cur;
 
 	/* Ensure not repeating fields that should not be repeated. */
-	switch (info[0].type) {
-	case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
-	case BPF_KPTR_REF:
-	case BPF_KPTR_PERCPU:
-	case BPF_LIST_HEAD:
-	case BPF_RB_ROOT:
-		break;
-	default:
-		return -EINVAL;
+	for (i = 0; i < field_cnt; i++) {
+		switch (info[i].type) {
+		case BPF_KPTR_UNREF:
+		case BPF_KPTR_REF:
+		case BPF_KPTR_PERCPU:
+		case BPF_LIST_HEAD:
+		case BPF_RB_ROOT:
+			break;
+		default:
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
 	}
 
-	cur = 1;
+	cur = field_cnt;
 	for (i = 0; i < repeat_cnt; i++) {
-		memcpy(&info[cur], &info[0], sizeof(info[0]));
-		info[cur++].off += (i + 1) * elem_size;
+		memcpy(&info[cur], &info[0], field_cnt * sizeof(info[0]));
+		for (j = 0; j < field_cnt; j++)
+			info[cur++].off += (i + 1) * elem_size;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int btf_find_struct_field(const struct btf *btf,
+				 const struct btf_type *t, u32 field_mask,
+				 struct btf_field_info *info, int info_cnt);
+
+/* Find special fields in the struct type of a field.
+ *
+ * This function is used to find fields of special types that is not a
+ * global variable or a direct field of a struct type. It also handles the
+ * repetition if it is the element type of an array.
+ */
+static int btf_find_nested_struct(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
+				  u32 off, u32 nelems,
+				  u32 field_mask, struct btf_field_info *info,
+				  int info_cnt)
+{
+	int ret, err, i;
+
+	ret = btf_find_struct_field(btf, t, field_mask, info, info_cnt);
+
+	if (ret <= 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Shift the offsets of the nested struct fields to the offsets
+	 * related to the container.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < ret; i++)
+		info[i].off += off;
+
+	if (nelems > 1) {
+		err = btf_repeat_fields(info, ret, nelems - 1, t->size);
+		if (err == 0)
+			ret *= nelems;
+		else
+			ret = err;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
 			      const struct btf_type *var,
 			      const struct btf_type *var_type,
@@ -3555,6 +3597,17 @@  static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
 
 	field_type = btf_get_field_type(__btf_name_by_offset(btf, var_type->name_off),
 					field_mask, seen_mask, &align, &sz);
+	/* Look into variables of struct types */
+	if ((field_type == BPF_KPTR_REF || !field_type) &&
+	    __btf_type_is_struct(var_type)) {
+		sz = var_type->size;
+		if (expected_size && expected_size != sz * nelems)
+			return 0;
+		ret = btf_find_nested_struct(btf, var_type, off, nelems, field_mask,
+					     &info[0], info_cnt);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	if (field_type == 0)
 		return 0;
 	if (field_type < 0)
@@ -3603,7 +3656,7 @@  static int btf_find_field_one(const struct btf *btf,
 	if (nelems > info_cnt)
 		return -E2BIG;
 	if (nelems > 1) {
-		ret = btf_repeat_field(info, nelems - 1, sz);
+		ret = btf_repeat_fields(info, 1, nelems - 1, sz);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 	}