diff mbox series

[v1,bpf-next,14/17] selftests/bpf: Expand sockaddr program return value tests

Message ID 20240510190246.3247730-15-jrife@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 1e0a8367c89f82816735973d0e65a3c8e1b43179
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Retire progs/test_sock_addr.c | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail merge-conflict
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18 and -O2 optimization
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat

Commit Message

Jordan Rife May 10, 2024, 7:02 p.m. UTC
This patch expands verifier coverage for program return values to cover
bind, connect, sendmsg, getsockname, and getpeername hooks. It also
rounds out the recvmsg coverage by adding test cases for recvmsg_unix
hooks.

Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jrife@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock_addr.c  | 294 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 294 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock_addr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock_addr.c
index 5081fa723d3a7..9c31448a0f520 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock_addr.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_sock_addr.c
@@ -34,4 +34,298 @@  int recvmsg6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("cgroup/recvmsg_unix")
+__success
+int recvmsg_unix_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/recvmsg_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int recvmsg_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg4")
+__success
+int sendmsg4_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg4")
+__success
+int sendmsg4_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int sendmsg4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg6")
+__success
+int sendmsg6_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg6")
+__success
+int sendmsg6_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int sendmsg6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg_unix")
+__success
+int sendmsg_unix_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg_unix")
+__success
+int sendmsg_unix_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/sendmsg_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int sendmsg_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername4")
+__success
+int getpeername4_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getpeername4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername6")
+__success
+int getpeername6_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getpeername6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername_unix")
+__success
+int getpeername_unix_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getpeername_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getpeername_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname4")
+__success
+int getsockname4_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getsockname4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname6")
+__success
+int getsockname6_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getsockname6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname_unix")
+__success
+int getsockname_unix_good_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/getsockname_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=0 smax=0 should have been in [1, 1]")
+int getsockname_unix_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__success
+int bind4_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__success
+int bind4_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__success
+int bind4_good_return_code_2(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__success
+int bind4_good_return_code_3(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 3;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=4 smax=4 should have been in [0, 3]")
+int bind4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 4;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__success
+int bind6_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__success
+int bind6_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__success
+int bind6_good_return_code_2(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__success
+int bind6_good_return_code_3(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 3;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=4 smax=4 should have been in [0, 3]")
+int bind6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 4;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect4")
+__success
+int connect4_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect4")
+__success
+int connect4_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect4")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int connect4_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect6")
+__success
+int connect6_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect6")
+__success
+int connect6_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect6")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int connect6_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 2;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect_unix")
+__success
+int connect_unix_good_return_code_0(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect_unix")
+__success
+int connect_unix_good_return_code_1(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/connect_unix")
+__failure __msg("At program exit the register R0 has smin=2 smax=2 should have been in [0, 1]")
+int connect_unix_bad_return_code(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 2;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";