Message ID | 20240530034143.19579-1-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 30636258a7c9174be44ddb2318bae4f66d4beab0 |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net,v2] virtio_net: fix missing lock protection on control_buf access | expand |
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 11:41 AM Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > Refactored the handling of control_buf to be within the cvq_lock > critical section, mitigating race conditions between reading device > responses and new command submissions. > > Fixes: 6f45ab3e0409 ("virtio_net: Add a lock for the command VQ.") > Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> > Reviewed-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com> > --- > v1->v2: > - Use the ok instead of ret. > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index 4a802c0ea2cb..1ea8e6a24286 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -2686,6 +2686,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd > { > struct scatterlist *sgs[5], hdr, stat; > u32 out_num = 0, tmp, in_num = 0; > + bool ok; > int ret; > > /* Caller should know better */ > @@ -2731,8 +2732,9 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd > } > > unlock: > + ok = vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK; > mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock); > - return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK; > + return ok; > } > > static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd, > -- > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Thanks
On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:41:43 +0800, Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > Refactored the handling of control_buf to be within the cvq_lock > critical section, mitigating race conditions between reading device > responses and new command submissions. > > Fixes: 6f45ab3e0409 ("virtio_net: Add a lock for the command VQ.") > Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> > Reviewed-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > v1->v2: > - Use the ok instead of ret. > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index 4a802c0ea2cb..1ea8e6a24286 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -2686,6 +2686,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd > { > struct scatterlist *sgs[5], hdr, stat; > u32 out_num = 0, tmp, in_num = 0; > + bool ok; > int ret; > > /* Caller should know better */ > @@ -2731,8 +2732,9 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd > } > > unlock: > + ok = vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK; > mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock); > - return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK; > + return ok; > } > > static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd, > -- > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f >
Hello: This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main) by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: On Thu, 30 May 2024 11:41:43 +0800 you wrote: > Refactored the handling of control_buf to be within the cvq_lock > critical section, mitigating race conditions between reading device > responses and new command submissions. > > Fixes: 6f45ab3e0409 ("virtio_net: Add a lock for the command VQ.") > Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com> > Reviewed-by: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com> > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [net,v2] virtio_net: fix missing lock protection on control_buf access https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/30636258a7c9 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 4a802c0ea2cb..1ea8e6a24286 100644 --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c @@ -2686,6 +2686,7 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd { struct scatterlist *sgs[5], hdr, stat; u32 out_num = 0, tmp, in_num = 0; + bool ok; int ret; /* Caller should know better */ @@ -2731,8 +2732,9 @@ static bool virtnet_send_command_reply(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd } unlock: + ok = vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK; mutex_unlock(&vi->cvq_lock); - return vi->ctrl->status == VIRTIO_NET_OK; + return ok; } static bool virtnet_send_command(struct virtnet_info *vi, u8 class, u8 cmd,