Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
fail
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
fail
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Posting correctly formatted
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
No tools touched, skip
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
12 maintainers not CCed: yonghong.song@linux.dev svens@linux.ibm.com haoluo@google.com linux-s390@vger.kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org song@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com eddyz87@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev sdf@google.com borntraeger@linux.ibm.com
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 8 this patch: 8
|
netdev/checkpatch |
success
|
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 133 lines checked
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
@@ -704,14 +704,28 @@ static void bpf_jit_probe_emit_nop(struct bpf_jit *jit,
_EMIT2(0x0700);
}
-static int bpf_jit_probe_mem(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
- struct bpf_jit_probe *probe)
+static void bpf_jit_probe_load_pre(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_insn *insn,
+ struct bpf_jit_probe *probe)
+{
+ if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_PROBE_MEM &&
+ BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_PROBE_MEMSX)
+ return;
+
+ probe->prg = jit->prg;
+ probe->reg = reg2hex[insn->dst_reg];
+}
+
+static int bpf_jit_probe_post(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
+ struct bpf_jit_probe *probe)
{
struct exception_table_entry *ex;
int i, prg;
s64 delta;
u8 *insn;
+ if (probe->prg == -1)
+ /* The probe is not armed. */
+ return 0;
bpf_jit_probe_emit_nop(jit, probe);
if (!fp->aux->extable)
/* Do nothing during early JIT passes. */
@@ -798,12 +812,6 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
int err;
bpf_jit_probe_init(&probe);
- if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_LDX &&
- (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM ||
- BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEMSX)) {
- probe.prg = jit->prg;
- probe.reg = reg2hex[dst_reg];
- }
switch (insn->code) {
/*
@@ -1497,51 +1505,79 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
*/
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B: /* dst = *(u8 *)(ul) (src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_B:
+ bpf_jit_probe_load_pre(jit, insn, &probe);
/* llgc %dst,0(off,%src) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0090, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off);
+ err = bpf_jit_probe_post(jit, fp, &probe);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM;
if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
insn_count = 2;
break;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_B: /* dst = *(s8 *)(ul) (src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEMSX | BPF_B:
+ bpf_jit_probe_load_pre(jit, insn, &probe);
/* lgb %dst,0(off,%src) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0077, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off);
+ err = bpf_jit_probe_post(jit, fp, &probe);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM;
break;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H: /* dst = *(u16 *)(ul) (src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_H:
+ bpf_jit_probe_load_pre(jit, insn, &probe);
/* llgh %dst,0(off,%src) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0091, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off);
+ err = bpf_jit_probe_post(jit, fp, &probe);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM;
if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
insn_count = 2;
break;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_H: /* dst = *(s16 *)(ul) (src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEMSX | BPF_H:
+ bpf_jit_probe_load_pre(jit, insn, &probe);
/* lgh %dst,0(off,%src) */
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0015, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off);
+ err = bpf_jit_probe_post(jit, fp, &probe);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM;
break;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W: /* dst = *(u32 *)(ul) (src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W:
+ bpf_jit_probe_load_pre(jit, insn, &probe);
/* llgf %dst,off(%src) */
jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM;
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0016, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off);
+ err = bpf_jit_probe_post(jit, fp, &probe);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
if (insn_is_zext(&insn[1]))
insn_count = 2;
break;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEMSX | BPF_W: /* dst = *(s32 *)(ul) (src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEMSX | BPF_W:
+ bpf_jit_probe_load_pre(jit, insn, &probe);
/* lgf %dst,off(%src) */
jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM;
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0014, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off);
+ err = bpf_jit_probe_post(jit, fp, &probe);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
break;
case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW: /* dst = *(u64 *)(ul) (src + off) */
case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW:
+ bpf_jit_probe_load_pre(jit, insn, &probe);
/* lg %dst,0(off,%src) */
jit->seen |= SEEN_MEM;
EMIT6_DISP_LH(0xe3000000, 0x0004, dst_reg, src_reg, REG_0, off);
+ err = bpf_jit_probe_post(jit, fp, &probe);
+ if (err < 0)
+ return err;
break;
/*
* BPF_JMP / CALL
@@ -1906,12 +1942,6 @@ static noinline int bpf_jit_insn(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp,
return -1;
}
- if (probe.prg != -1) {
- err = bpf_jit_probe_mem(jit, fp, &probe);
- if (err < 0)
- return err;
- }
-
return insn_count;
}
Currently probe insns are handled by two "if" statements at the beginning and at the end of bpf_jit_insn(). The first one needs to be in sync with the huge insn->code statement that follows it, which was not a problem so far, since the check is small. The introduction of arena will make it significantly larger, and it will no longer be obvious whether it is in sync with the opcode switch. Move these statements to the new bpf_jit_probe_load_pre() and bpf_jit_probe_post() functions, and call them only from cases that need them. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)