From patchwork Tue Jul 2 01:37:28 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pu Lehui X-Patchwork-Id: 13718889 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 155EEB64A; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719884160; cv=none; b=hE1WzEBr9QCNSSo+rUsEdku/Cv+uApr+HuIa4ZFCAhRIXiXMBfAzoYMKu0guYRDnJqeMiXwSzxynTIINaiikUY1uMIAQRqlUxPR84zlocDdjQgCWIvkCvaFUM5jNeopA8XtWh2GTtcWFJJtPjXD+1m+QlP/sEHrgdNB1bqTnRmM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1719884160; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3VDAuiZBH+gLjN3NTcg0rMEOelsUtjIHrtwcAvN4804=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LC98EjtxpKBUVIQWQKVdsqWyLpNQxmTNhrqzs27Ui2z39FCcrvgU0PBCQWGN0KpvyZwj0irW3/vaglONxmNaHFAKe0py3jzT/f00thAGqdRwqhMsYeCB4Kdow19Z84BYV9F7WU17Mg1lzMfLHBJ4r996rix+BG30drZpT7DlWyo= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.93.142]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WClpw6JGrz4f3jdq; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:35:36 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8511A0185; Tue, 2 Jul 2024 09:35:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from ultra.huawei.com (unknown [10.90.53.71]) by APP1 (Coremail) with SMTP id cCh0CgCXwX1vWYNm+0GRAw--.62272S3; Tue, 02 Jul 2024 09:35:47 +0800 (CST) From: Pu Lehui To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?utf-8?b?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Stanislav Fomichev , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Puranjay Mohan , Palmer Dabbelt , Pu Lehui Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/3] riscv, bpf: Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 01:37:28 +0000 Message-Id: <20240702013730.1082285-2-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240702013730.1082285-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> References: <20240702013730.1082285-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CM-TRANSID: cCh0CgCXwX1vWYNm+0GRAw--.62272S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW3Ar15Jw13Kr13Ww4xtF4UXFb_yoWxXF4fp3 WDKwsxAF9YqF47Gayvga1UXF13Aan0v34akFW7Gas3uayYqr98GayFkF4jyry5Gr1rAw1f AFs0vr95K3W7ArDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUUB0b4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26rWj6s0DM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28IrcIa0xkI8VA2jI8067AKxVWUGw A2048vs2IY020Ec7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwVA0rcxS w2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW7JVWDJwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxV W8Jr0_Cr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v2 6rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMc Ij6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_ Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFIxGxcIEc7CjxVA2Y2ka0xkIwI1l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r4a6rW5MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6I8E87Iv6xkF7I 0E14v26r4j6r4UJbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU2mL9UUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: psxovxtxl6x35dzhxuhorxvhhfrp/ X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Pu Lehui This patch adds 12 function arguments support for riscv64 bpf trampoline. The current bpf trampoline supports <= sizeof(u64) bytes scalar arguments [0] and <= 16 bytes struct arguments [1]. Therefore, we focus on the situation where scalars are at most XLEN bits and aggregates whose total size does not exceed 2×XLEN bits in the riscv calling convention [2]. Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6184 [0] Link: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.8/source/kernel/bpf/btf.c#L6769 [1] Link: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/releases/download/draft-20230929-e5c800e661a53efe3c2678d71a306323b60eb13b/riscv-abi.pdf [2] Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui Acked-by: Björn Töpel Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel --- arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c index 351e1484205e..685c7389ae7e 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c +++ b/arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ #include #include "bpf_jit.h" +#define RV_MAX_REG_ARGS 8 #define RV_FENTRY_NINSNS 2 /* imm that allows emit_imm to emit max count insns */ #define RV_MAX_COUNT_IMM 0x7FFF7FF7FF7FF7FF @@ -692,26 +693,45 @@ int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type poke_type, return ret; } -static void store_args(int nregs, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) +static void store_args(int nr_arg_slots, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++) { - emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_A0 + i, ctx); + for (i = 0; i < nr_arg_slots; i++) { + if (i < RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) { + emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_A0 + i, ctx); + } else { + /* skip slots for T0 and FP of traced function */ + emit_ld(RV_REG_T1, 16 + (i - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8, RV_REG_FP, ctx); + emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -args_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx); + } args_off -= 8; } } -static void restore_args(int nregs, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) +static void restore_args(int nr_reg_args, int args_off, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < nregs; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < nr_reg_args; i++) { emit_ld(RV_REG_A0 + i, -args_off, RV_REG_FP, ctx); args_off -= 8; } } +static void restore_stack_args(int nr_stack_args, int args_off, int stk_arg_off, + struct rv_jit_context *ctx) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < nr_stack_args; i++) { + emit_ld(RV_REG_T1, -(args_off - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS * 8), RV_REG_FP, ctx); + emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -stk_arg_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx); + args_off -= 8; + stk_arg_off -= 8; + } +} + static int invoke_bpf_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *l, int args_off, int retval_off, int run_ctx_off, bool save_ret, struct rv_jit_context *ctx) { @@ -784,8 +804,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, { int i, ret, offset; int *branches_off = NULL; - int stack_size = 0, nregs = m->nr_args; - int retval_off, args_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, sreg_off; + int stack_size = 0, nr_arg_slots = 0; + int retval_off, args_off, nregs_off, ip_off, run_ctx_off, sreg_off, stk_arg_off; struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY]; struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT]; struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN]; @@ -831,20 +851,21 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, * FP - sreg_off [ callee saved reg ] * * [ pads ] pads for 16 bytes alignment + * + * [ stack_argN ] + * [ ... ] + * FP - stk_arg_off [ stack_arg1 ] BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG */ if (flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK | BPF_TRAMP_F_SHARE_IPMODIFY)) return -ENOTSUPP; - /* extra regiters for struct arguments */ - for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++) - if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG) - nregs += round_up(m->arg_size[i], 8) / 8 - 1; - - /* 8 arguments passed by registers */ - if (nregs > 8) + if (m->nr_args > MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS) return -ENOTSUPP; + for (i = 0; i < m->nr_args; i++) + nr_arg_slots += round_up(m->arg_size[i], 8) / 8; + /* room of trampoline frame to store return address and frame pointer */ stack_size += 16; @@ -854,7 +875,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, retval_off = stack_size; } - stack_size += nregs * 8; + stack_size += nr_arg_slots * 8; args_off = stack_size; stack_size += 8; @@ -871,8 +892,14 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, stack_size += 8; sreg_off = stack_size; + if (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS > 0) + stack_size += (nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS) * 8; + stack_size = round_up(stack_size, STACK_ALIGN); + /* room for args on stack must be at the top of stack */ + stk_arg_off = stack_size; + if (!is_struct_ops) { /* For the trampoline called from function entry, * the frame of traced function and the frame of @@ -908,10 +935,10 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -ip_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx); } - emit_li(RV_REG_T1, nregs, ctx); + emit_li(RV_REG_T1, nr_arg_slots, ctx); emit_sd(RV_REG_FP, -nregs_off, RV_REG_T1, ctx); - store_args(nregs, args_off, ctx); + store_args(nr_arg_slots, args_off, ctx); /* skip to actual body of traced function */ if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME) @@ -951,7 +978,8 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, } if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) { - restore_args(nregs, args_off, ctx); + restore_args(min_t(int, nr_arg_slots, RV_MAX_REG_ARGS), args_off, ctx); + restore_stack_args(nr_arg_slots - RV_MAX_REG_ARGS, args_off, stk_arg_off, ctx); ret = emit_call((const u64)orig_call, true, ctx); if (ret) goto out; @@ -986,7 +1014,7 @@ static int __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, } if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS) - restore_args(nregs, args_off, ctx); + restore_args(min_t(int, nr_arg_slots, RV_MAX_REG_ARGS), args_off, ctx); if (save_ret) { emit_ld(RV_REG_A0, -retval_off, RV_REG_FP, ctx);