diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v5,2/3] selftests/bpf: Factor out many args tests from tracing_struct

Message ID 20240702013730.1082285-3-pulehui@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Add 12-argument support for RV64 bpf trampoline | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 fail Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
netdev/series_format success Posting correctly formatted
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 850 this patch: 850
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 6 maintainers not CCed: imagedong@tencent.com mykolal@fb.com paul.walmsley@sifive.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org shuah@kernel.org aou@eecs.berkeley.edu
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 854 this patch: 854
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 859 this patch: 859
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Pu Lehui July 2, 2024, 1:37 a.m. UTC
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>

Factor out many args tests from tracing_struct and rename some function
names to make more sense.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c | 32 ++++++++--
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c      | 54 -----------------
 .../bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c      | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c

Comments

Jiri Olsa July 2, 2024, 11:06 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 01:37:29AM +0000, Pu Lehui wrote:

SNIP

> +
> +static void test_struct_many_args(void)
> +{
> +	struct tracing_struct_many_args *skel;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	skel = tracing_struct_many_args__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "tracing_struct_many_args__open_and_load"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	err = tracing_struct_many_args__attach(skel);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tracing_struct_many_args__attach"))
> +		goto destroy_skel;
> +
> +	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(256), "trigger_read");
> +
>  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_a, 16, "t7:a");
>  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_b, 17, "t7:b");
>  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_c, 18, "t7:c");
> @@ -74,12 +95,15 @@ static void test_fentry(void)
>  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_g, 23, "t8:g");
>  	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_ret, 156, "t8 ret");
>  
> -	tracing_struct__detach(skel);
> +	tracing_struct_many_args__detach(skel);

nit, I know it's in the current code, but tracing_struct_many_args__destroy
will take care of the detach, so no need to call it explicitly

jirka


>  destroy_skel:
> -	tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
> +	tracing_struct_many_args__destroy(skel);
>  }
>  

SNIP
Pu Lehui July 2, 2024, 11:57 a.m. UTC | #2
On 2024/7/2 19:06, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2024 at 01:37:29AM +0000, Pu Lehui wrote:
> 
> SNIP
> 
>> +
>> +static void test_struct_many_args(void)
>> +{
>> +	struct tracing_struct_many_args *skel;
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	skel = tracing_struct_many_args__open_and_load();
>> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "tracing_struct_many_args__open_and_load"))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	err = tracing_struct_many_args__attach(skel);
>> +	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tracing_struct_many_args__attach"))
>> +		goto destroy_skel;
>> +
>> +	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(256), "trigger_read");
>> +
>>   	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_a, 16, "t7:a");
>>   	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_b, 17, "t7:b");
>>   	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_c, 18, "t7:c");
>> @@ -74,12 +95,15 @@ static void test_fentry(void)
>>   	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_g, 23, "t8:g");
>>   	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_ret, 156, "t8 ret");
>>   
>> -	tracing_struct__detach(skel);
>> +	tracing_struct_many_args__detach(skel);
> 
> nit, I know it's in the current code, but tracing_struct_many_args__destroy
> will take care of the detach, so no need to call it explicitly

Alright, will resend a new version. Thanks

> 
> jirka
> 
> 
>>   destroy_skel:
>> -	tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
>> +	tracing_struct_many_args__destroy(skel);
>>   }
>>   
> 
> SNIP
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
index fe0fb0c9849a..2820fd912f2f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tracing_struct.c
@@ -3,8 +3,9 @@ 
 
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include "tracing_struct.skel.h"
+#include "tracing_struct_many_args.skel.h"
 
-static void test_fentry(void)
+static void test_struct_args(void)
 {
 	struct tracing_struct *skel;
 	int err;
@@ -55,6 +56,26 @@  static void test_fentry(void)
 
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t6, 1, "t6 ret");
 
+	tracing_struct__detach(skel);
+destroy_skel:
+	tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+static void test_struct_many_args(void)
+{
+	struct tracing_struct_many_args *skel;
+	int err;
+
+	skel = tracing_struct_many_args__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "tracing_struct_many_args__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	err = tracing_struct_many_args__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "tracing_struct_many_args__attach"))
+		goto destroy_skel;
+
+	ASSERT_OK(trigger_module_test_read(256), "trigger_read");
+
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_a, 16, "t7:a");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_b, 17, "t7:b");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t7_c, 18, "t7:c");
@@ -74,12 +95,15 @@  static void test_fentry(void)
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_g, 23, "t8:g");
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->t8_ret, 156, "t8 ret");
 
-	tracing_struct__detach(skel);
+	tracing_struct_many_args__detach(skel);
 destroy_skel:
-	tracing_struct__destroy(skel);
+	tracing_struct_many_args__destroy(skel);
 }
 
 void test_tracing_struct(void)
 {
-	test_fentry();
+	if (test__start_subtest("struct_args"))
+		test_struct_args();
+	if (test__start_subtest("struct_many_args"))
+		test_struct_many_args();
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
index 515daef3c84b..c435a3a8328a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct.c
@@ -18,11 +18,6 @@  struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 {
 	int b[];
 };
 
-struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 {
-	u64 a;
-	int b;
-};
-
 long t1_a_a, t1_a_b, t1_b, t1_c, t1_ret, t1_nregs;
 __u64 t1_reg0, t1_reg1, t1_reg2, t1_reg3;
 long t2_a, t2_b_a, t2_b_b, t2_c, t2_ret;
@@ -30,9 +25,6 @@  long t3_a, t3_b, t3_c_a, t3_c_b, t3_ret;
 long t4_a_a, t4_b, t4_c, t4_d, t4_e_a, t4_e_b, t4_ret;
 long t5_ret;
 int t6;
-long t7_a, t7_b, t7_c, t7_d, t7_e, t7_f_a, t7_f_b, t7_ret;
-long t8_a, t8_b, t8_c, t8_d, t8_e, t8_f_a, t8_f_b, t8_g, t8_ret;
-
 
 SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1")
 int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_1, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2, a, int, b, int, c)
@@ -138,50 +130,4 @@  int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_11, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_3 *, a)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
-int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_12, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
-	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f)
-{
-	t7_a = a;
-	t7_b = (long)b;
-	t7_c = c;
-	t7_d = d;
-	t7_e = (long)e;
-	t7_f_a = f.a;
-	t7_f_b = f.b;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
-int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_13, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
-	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, ret)
-{
-	t7_ret = ret;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
-int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_14, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
-	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g)
-{
-	t8_a = a;
-	t8_b = (long)b;
-	t8_c = c;
-	t8_d = d;
-	t8_e = (long)e;
-	t8_f_a = f.a;
-	t8_f_b = f.b;
-	t8_g = g;
-	return 0;
-}
-
-SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
-int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_arg_15, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
-	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g,
-	      int, ret)
-{
-	t8_ret = ret;
-	return 0;
-}
-
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3de4bb918178
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/tracing_struct_many_args.c
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <vmlinux.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4 {
+	u64 a;
+	int b;
+};
+
+long t7_a, t7_b, t7_c, t7_d, t7_e, t7_f_a, t7_f_b, t7_ret;
+long t8_a, t8_b, t8_c, t8_d, t8_e, t8_f_a, t8_f_b, t8_g, t8_ret;
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_1, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f)
+{
+	t7_a = a;
+	t7_b = (long)b;
+	t7_c = c;
+	t7_d = d;
+	t7_e = (long)e;
+	t7_f_a = f.a;
+	t7_f_b = f.b;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_7")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_2, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, ret)
+{
+	t7_ret = ret;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_3, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g)
+{
+	t8_a = a;
+	t8_b = (long)b;
+	t8_c = c;
+	t8_d = d;
+	t8_e = (long)e;
+	t8_f_a = f.a;
+	t8_f_b = f.b;
+	t8_g = g;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fexit/bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_8")
+int BPF_PROG2(test_struct_many_args_4, __u64, a, void *, b, short, c, int, d,
+	      void *, e, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_4, f, int, g,
+	      int, ret)
+{
+	t8_ret = ret;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";