From patchwork Wed Jul 10 17:12:45 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kuniyuki Iwashima X-Patchwork-Id: 13729526 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from smtp-fw-80009.amazon.com (smtp-fw-80009.amazon.com [99.78.197.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EBB534545 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:13:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=99.78.197.220 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720631614; cv=none; b=TbrXogzMKwTut049Hax/M+jx/+DxQN2epvU2Rt4N60HUYgxhYyT5iivrCnAjgki7urIAM/ylkYskUKMHMzH3OXqjhsNQINZ5OnbDyN+vQiwb8nUgSB99HMaZ1y1TcuLpq46pl+IbGqSDcSx9bIDmGEHu4xf8lPkyeBOktIropb8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720631614; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WVTNlL61FZRK12oiQzJCuNGMlZ48P87XRDRfdN8tJXk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GL1eQDY/AdjuAweseEPa7QOAyHCu+DPNSJb0/1x+U9aatPh/713kgvtsuloKgwBu5yjovuBQDuwA+X3bGpZTJa9tONI4Zi0gAINZQFc1xOCDMjL2ECCTP+SpjFeCrRlv+lurUznJ1hd5LRAfKKWBAUpCRlCJPaKsciaT1gyXahI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b=sSDPqVsp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=99.78.197.220 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=amazon.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=amazon.co.jp Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazon.com header.i=@amazon.com header.b="sSDPqVsp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amazon.com; i=@amazon.com; q=dns/txt; s=amazon201209; t=1720631613; x=1752167613; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vwtF4Yf8UOkTqy44iTcUo6gg5bK1izSRFP3HjHHqDXY=; b=sSDPqVspJRwKUveoJrU6lwvSxwrkhUSkkF/AeT/n4Elft9EkJsQgqdTF lKJAyyrfQEPBNpLRi7teTwJT4IMh5Krb1HWdyTJ2AT7e9Lisz1CPouLqc AQ3uVSyZLuO4t7dDd98ju73VkoN8OkDax3q/1VsCMnDhBZMZ5a1t04BK7 s=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,198,1716249600"; d="scan'208";a="104391639" Received: from pdx4-co-svc-p1-lb2-vlan2.amazon.com (HELO smtpout.prod.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev) ([10.25.36.210]) by smtp-border-fw-80009.pdx80.corp.amazon.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jul 2024 17:13:29 +0000 Received: from EX19MTAUWB002.ant.amazon.com [10.0.38.20:18989] by smtpin.naws.us-west-2.prod.farcaster.email.amazon.dev [10.0.58.123:2525] with esmtp (Farcaster) id 9783cb74-58e5-4f32-9837-809e2886d0f2; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:13:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Farcaster-Flow-ID: 9783cb74-58e5-4f32-9837-809e2886d0f2 Received: from EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) by EX19MTAUWB002.ant.amazon.com (10.250.64.231) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1258.34; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:13:27 +0000 Received: from 88665a182662.ant.amazon.com.com (10.187.171.41) by EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.2.1258.34; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:13:24 +0000 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima To: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , David Ahern CC: Kuniyuki Iwashima , Kuniyuki Iwashima , Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] tcp: Don't drop SYN+ACK for simultaneous connect(). Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:12:45 -0700 Message-ID: <20240710171246.87533-2-kuniyu@amazon.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20240710171246.87533-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> References: <20240710171246.87533-1-kuniyu@amazon.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: EX19D042UWA001.ant.amazon.com (10.13.139.92) To EX19D004ANA001.ant.amazon.com (10.37.240.138) X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org RFC 9293 states that in the case of simultaneous connect(), the connection gets established when SYN+ACK is received. [0] TCP Peer A TCP Peer B 1. CLOSED CLOSED 2. SYN-SENT --> ... 3. SYN-RECEIVED <-- <-- SYN-SENT 4. ... --> SYN-RECEIVED 5. SYN-RECEIVED --> ... 6. ESTABLISHED <-- <-- SYN-RECEIVED 7. ... --> ESTABLISHED However, since commit 0c24604b68fc ("tcp: implement RFC 5961 4.2"), such a SYN+ACK is dropped in tcp_validate_incoming() and responded with Challenge ACK. For example, the write() syscall in the following packetdrill script fails with -EAGAIN, and wrong SNMP stats get incremented. 0 socket(..., SOCK_STREAM|SOCK_NONBLOCK, IPPROTO_TCP) = 3 +0 connect(3, ..., ...) = -1 EINPROGRESS (Operation now in progress) +0 > S 0:0(0) +0 < S 0:0(0) win 1000 +0 > S. 0:0(0) ack 1 +0 < S. 0:0(0) ack 1 win 1000 +0 write(3, ..., 100) = 100 +0 > P. 1:101(100) ack 1 -- # packetdrill cross-synack.pkt cross-synack.pkt:13: runtime error in write call: Expected result 100 but got -1 with errno 11 (Resource temporarily unavailable) # nstat ... TcpExtTCPChallengeACK 1 0.0 TcpExtTCPSYNChallenge 1 0.0 The problem is that bpf_skops_established() is triggered by the Challenge ACK instead of SYN+ACK. This causes the bpf prog to miss the chance to check if the peer supports a TCP option that is expected to be exchanged in SYN and SYN+ACK. Let's accept a bare SYN+ACK for active-open TCP_SYN_RECV sockets to avoid such a situation. Note that tcp_ack_snd_check() in tcp_rcv_state_process() is skipped not to send an unnecessary ACK, but this could be a bit risky for net.git, so this targets for net-next. Link: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9293.html#section-3.5-7 [0] Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet --- net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 47dacb575f74..1eddb6b9fb2a 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -5989,6 +5989,11 @@ static bool tcp_validate_incoming(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, * RFC 5961 4.2 : Send a challenge ack */ if (th->syn) { + if (sk->sk_state == TCP_SYN_RECV && sk->sk_socket && th->ack && + TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1 == TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq && + TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + 1 == tp->rcv_nxt && + TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->ack_seq == tp->snd_nxt) + goto pass; syn_challenge: if (syn_inerr) TCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), TCP_MIB_INERRS); @@ -5998,6 +6003,7 @@ static bool tcp_validate_incoming(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, goto discard; } +pass: bpf_skops_parse_hdr(sk, skb); return true; @@ -6804,6 +6810,9 @@ tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb) tcp_fast_path_on(tp); if (sk->sk_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) tcp_shutdown(sk, SEND_SHUTDOWN); + + if (sk->sk_socket) + goto consume; break; case TCP_FIN_WAIT1: {