diff mbox series

[7/7] xfrm: call xfrm_dev_policy_delete when kill policy

Message ID 20240711100025.1949454-8-steffen.klassert@secunet.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series [1/7] net: esp: cleanup esp_output_tail_tcp() in case of unsupported ESPINTCP | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format warning Pull request is its own cover letter; Target tree name not specified in the subject
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 816 this patch: 816
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 3 blamed authors not CCed: leon@kernel.org horms@kernel.org raeds@nvidia.com; 5 maintainers not CCed: leon@kernel.org edumazet@google.com pabeni@redhat.com horms@kernel.org raeds@nvidia.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 821 this patch: 821
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 846 this patch: 846
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 36 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Steffen Klassert July 11, 2024, 10 a.m. UTC 
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>

xfrm_policy_kill() is called at different places to delete xfrm
policy. It will call xfrm_pol_put(). But xfrm_dev_policy_delete() is
not called to free the policy offloaded to hardware.

The three commits cited here are to handle this issue by calling
xfrm_dev_policy_delete() outside xfrm_get_policy(). But they didn't
cover all the cases. An example, which is not handled for now, is
xfrm_policy_insert(). It is called when XFRM_MSG_UPDPOLICY request is
received. Old policy is replaced by new one, but the offloaded policy
is not deleted, so driver doesn't have the chance to release hardware
resources.

To resolve this issue for all cases, move xfrm_dev_policy_delete()
into xfrm_policy_kill(), so the offloaded policy can be deleted from
hardware when it is called, which avoids hardware resources leakage.

Fixes: 919e43fad516 ("xfrm: add an interface to offload policy")
Fixes: bf06fcf4be0f ("xfrm: add missed call to delete offloaded policies")
Fixes: 982c3aca8bac ("xfrm: delete offloaded policy")
Signed-off-by: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 5 ++---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c   | 1 -
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
index 475b904fe68b..10f68d572885 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -452,6 +452,8 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_policy_destroy);
 
 static void xfrm_policy_kill(struct xfrm_policy *policy)
 {
+	xfrm_dev_policy_delete(policy);
+
 	write_lock_bh(&policy->lock);
 	policy->walk.dead = 1;
 	write_unlock_bh(&policy->lock);
@@ -1850,7 +1852,6 @@  int xfrm_policy_flush(struct net *net, u8 type, bool task_valid)
 
 		__xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
-		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol);
 		cnt++;
 		xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, task_valid);
 		xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
@@ -1891,7 +1892,6 @@  int xfrm_dev_policy_flush(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
 
 		__xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
-		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol);
 		cnt++;
 		xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, task_valid);
 		xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
@@ -2342,7 +2342,6 @@  int xfrm_policy_delete(struct xfrm_policy *pol, int dir)
 	pol = __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
 	if (pol) {
-		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(pol);
 		xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
 		return 0;
 	}
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index e83c687bd64e..77355422ce82 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2455,7 +2455,6 @@  static int xfrm_get_policy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
 					    NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
 		}
 	} else {
-		xfrm_dev_policy_delete(xp);
 		xfrm_audit_policy_delete(xp, err ? 0 : 1, true);
 
 		if (err != 0)