diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v4,11/20] bpf, lsm: Add disabled BPF LSM hook list

Message ID 20240711111908.3817636-12-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Add return value range check for BPF LSM | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
netdev/series_format fail Series longer than 15 patches
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 816 this patch: 816
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 14 of 14 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 821 this patch: 821
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 821 this patch: 821
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 38 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Xu Kuohai July 11, 2024, 11:18 a.m. UTC 
From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>

Add a disabled hooks list for BPF LSM. progs being attached to the
listed hooks will be rejected by the verifier.

Suggested-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov July 12, 2024, 5:56 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 07:18:59PM +0800, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
> 
> Add a disabled hooks list for BPF LSM. progs being attached to the
> listed hooks will be rejected by the verifier.
> 
> Suggested-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>

Xu,

The patches 11 and higher are mostly independent from lsm refactoring.
Please send them as a separate patchset for bpf-next.
While lsm cleanups are being reviewed this lsm_disabled list can be
a bit larger temporarily.
Xu Kuohai July 13, 2024, 8:11 a.m. UTC | #2 
On 7/13/2024 1:56 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 07:18:59PM +0800, Xu Kuohai wrote:
>> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
>>
>> Add a disabled hooks list for BPF LSM. progs being attached to the
>> listed hooks will be rejected by the verifier.
>>
>> Suggested-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
> 
> Xu,
> 
> The patches 11 and higher are mostly independent from lsm refactoring.
> Please send them as a separate patchset for bpf-next.
> While lsm cleanups are being reviewed this lsm_disabled list can be
> a bit larger temporarily.
> 

It's great to separate patches unrelated to bpf by temporarily extending
the lsm disabled list. I'll post an update. Thanks!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index 08a338e1f231..e5feb6560fe6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -36,6 +36,12 @@  BTF_SET_START(bpf_lsm_hooks)
 #undef LSM_HOOK
 BTF_SET_END(bpf_lsm_hooks)
 
+BTF_SET_START(bpf_lsm_disabled_hooks)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_getprocattr)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_setprocattr)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_lsm_ismaclabel)
+BTF_SET_END(bpf_lsm_disabled_hooks)
+
 /* List of LSM hooks that should operate on 'current' cgroup regardless
  * of function signature.
  */
@@ -97,15 +103,24 @@  void bpf_lsm_find_cgroup_shim(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
 int bpf_lsm_verify_prog(struct bpf_verifier_log *vlog,
 			const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
+	u32 btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
+	const char *func_name = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
+
 	if (!prog->gpl_compatible) {
 		bpf_log(vlog,
 			"LSM programs must have a GPL compatible license\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	if (!btf_id_set_contains(&bpf_lsm_hooks, prog->aux->attach_btf_id)) {
+	if (btf_id_set_contains(&bpf_lsm_disabled_hooks, btf_id)) {
+		bpf_log(vlog, "attach_btf_id %u points to disabled hook %s\n",
+			btf_id, func_name);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (!btf_id_set_contains(&bpf_lsm_hooks, btf_id)) {
 		bpf_log(vlog, "attach_btf_id %u points to wrong type name %s\n",
-			prog->aux->attach_btf_id, prog->aux->attach_func_name);
+			btf_id, func_name);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}