Context |
Check |
Description |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR |
success
|
PR summary
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 |
success
|
Logs for set-matrix
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 |
success
|
Logs for Unittests
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 |
success
|
Logs for Validate matrix.py
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 |
pending
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 |
success
|
Logs for ShellCheck
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 |
success
|
Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 |
success
|
Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 |
success
|
Logs for Lint
|
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 |
success
|
Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
|
netdev/series_format |
success
|
Single patches do not need cover letters
|
netdev/tree_selection |
success
|
Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
|
netdev/ynl |
success
|
Generated files up to date;
no warnings/errors;
no diff in generated;
|
netdev/fixes_present |
success
|
Fixes tag not required for -next series
|
netdev/header_inline |
success
|
No static functions without inline keyword in header files
|
netdev/build_32bit |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 1054 this patch: 1054
|
netdev/build_tools |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
|
netdev/cc_maintainers |
warning
|
16 maintainers not CCed: kpsingh@kernel.org dave.hansen@linux.intel.com haoluo@google.com dsahern@kernel.org bp@alien8.de john.fastabend@gmail.com hpa@zytor.com song@kernel.org mingo@redhat.com x86@kernel.org netdev@vger.kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev eddyz87@gmail.com tglx@linutronix.de sdf@fomichev.me
|
netdev/build_clang |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 1128 this patch: 1128
|
netdev/verify_signedoff |
success
|
Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
|
netdev/deprecated_api |
success
|
None detected
|
netdev/check_selftest |
success
|
No net selftest shell script
|
netdev/verify_fixes |
success
|
No Fixes tag
|
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn |
fail
|
Errors and warnings before: 7782 this patch: 7783
|
netdev/checkpatch |
warning
|
CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast
WARNING: line length of 91 exceeds 80 columns
WARNING: line length of 94 exceeds 80 columns
|
netdev/build_clang_rust |
success
|
No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
|
netdev/kdoc |
success
|
Errors and warnings before: 6 this patch: 6
|
netdev/source_inline |
success
|
Was 0 now: 0
|
@@ -1309,6 +1309,22 @@ static void emit_shiftx(u8 **pprog, u32 dst_reg, u8 src_reg, bool is64, u8 op)
*pprog = prog;
}
+static void emit_private_frame_ptr(u8 **pprog, void *private_frame_ptr)
+{
+ u8 *prog = *pprog;
+
+ /* movabs r9, private_frame_ptr */
+ emit_mov_imm64(&prog, X86_REG_R9, (long) private_frame_ptr >> 32,
+ (u32) (long) private_frame_ptr);
+
+ /* add <r9>, gs:[<off>] */
+ EMIT2(0x65, 0x4c);
+ EMIT3(0x03, 0x0c, 0x25);
+ EMIT((u32)(unsigned long)&this_cpu_off, 4);
+
+ *pprog = prog;
+}
+
#define INSN_SZ_DIFF (((addrs[i] - addrs[i - 1]) - (prog - temp)))
/* mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - rounded_stack_depth - 8] */
@@ -1324,18 +1340,25 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
int insn_cnt = bpf_prog->len;
bool seen_exit = false;
u8 temp[BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE + BPF_INSN_SAFETY];
+ u32 stack_depth = bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth;
+ void __percpu *private_frame_ptr = NULL;
u64 arena_vm_start, user_vm_start;
int i, excnt = 0;
int ilen, proglen = 0;
u8 *prog = temp;
int err;
+ if (bpf_prog->private_stack_ptr) {
+ private_frame_ptr = bpf_prog->private_stack_ptr + round_up(stack_depth, 8);
+ stack_depth = 0;
+ }
+
arena_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_kern_vm_start(bpf_prog->aux->arena);
user_vm_start = bpf_arena_get_user_vm_start(bpf_prog->aux->arena);
detect_reg_usage(insn, insn_cnt, callee_regs_used);
- emit_prologue(&prog, bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth,
+ emit_prologue(&prog, stack_depth,
bpf_prog_was_classic(bpf_prog), tail_call_reachable,
bpf_is_subprog(bpf_prog), bpf_prog->aux->exception_cb);
/* Exception callback will clobber callee regs for its own use, and
@@ -1357,6 +1380,9 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
emit_mov_imm64(&prog, X86_REG_R12,
arena_vm_start >> 32, (u32) arena_vm_start);
+ if (private_frame_ptr)
+ emit_private_frame_ptr(&prog, private_frame_ptr);
+
ilen = prog - temp;
if (rw_image)
memcpy(rw_image + proglen, temp, ilen);
@@ -1376,6 +1402,14 @@ static int do_jit(struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog, int *addrs, u8 *image, u8 *rw_image
u8 *func;
int nops;
+ if (private_frame_ptr) {
+ if (src_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
+ src_reg = X86_REG_R9;
+
+ if (dst_reg == BPF_REG_FP)
+ dst_reg = X86_REG_R9;
+ }
+
switch (insn->code) {
/* ALU */
case BPF_ALU | BPF_ADD | BPF_X:
@@ -2007,6 +2041,7 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
emit_mov_reg(&prog, is64, real_src_reg, BPF_REG_0);
/* Restore R0 after clobbering RAX */
emit_mov_reg(&prog, true, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_AX);
+
break;
}
@@ -2031,14 +2066,20 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
if (tail_call_reachable) {
- RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth);
+ RESTORE_TAIL_CALL_CNT(stack_depth);
ip += 7;
}
if (!imm32)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (private_frame_ptr) {
+ EMIT2(0x41, 0x51); /* push r9 */
+ ip += 2;
+ }
ip += x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(&prog, func, ip);
if (emit_call(&prog, func, ip))
return -EINVAL;
+ if (private_frame_ptr)
+ EMIT2(0x41, 0x59); /* pop r9 */
break;
}
@@ -2048,13 +2089,13 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off))
&bpf_prog->aux->poke_tab[imm32 - 1],
&prog, image + addrs[i - 1],
callee_regs_used,
- bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth,
+ stack_depth,
ctx);
else
emit_bpf_tail_call_indirect(bpf_prog,
&prog,
callee_regs_used,
- bpf_prog->aux->stack_depth,
+ stack_depth,
image + addrs[i - 1],
ctx);
break;
@@ -3218,6 +3259,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
{
struct bpf_binary_header *rw_header = NULL;
struct bpf_binary_header *header = NULL;
+ void __percpu *private_stack_ptr = NULL;
struct bpf_prog *tmp, *orig_prog = prog;
struct x64_jit_data *jit_data;
int proglen, oldproglen = 0;
@@ -3284,6 +3326,15 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
ctx.cleanup_addr = proglen;
skip_init_addrs:
+ if (bpf_enable_private_stack(prog) && !prog->private_stack_ptr) {
+ private_stack_ptr = __alloc_percpu_gfp(prog->aux->stack_depth, 8, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!private_stack_ptr) {
+ prog = orig_prog;
+ goto out_addrs;
+ }
+ prog->private_stack_ptr = private_stack_ptr;
+ }
+
/*
* JITed image shrinks with every pass and the loop iterates
* until the image stops shrinking. Very large BPF programs
@@ -3309,6 +3360,10 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
prog->jited = 0;
prog->jited_len = 0;
}
+ if (private_stack_ptr) {
+ free_percpu(private_stack_ptr);
+ prog->private_stack_ptr = NULL;
+ }
goto out_addrs;
}
if (image) {
@@ -1563,6 +1563,7 @@ struct bpf_prog {
const struct bpf_insn *insn);
struct bpf_prog_aux *aux; /* Auxiliary fields */
struct sock_fprog_kern *orig_prog; /* Original BPF program */
+ void __percpu *private_stack_ptr;
/* Instructions for interpreter */
union {
DECLARE_FLEX_ARRAY(struct sock_filter, insns);
@@ -1819,6 +1820,7 @@ static inline void bpf_module_put(const void *data, struct module *owner)
module_put(owner);
}
int bpf_struct_ops_link_create(union bpf_attr *attr);
+bool bpf_enable_private_stack(struct bpf_prog *prog);
#ifdef CONFIG_NET
/* Define it here to avoid the use of forward declaration */
@@ -2813,6 +2813,26 @@ void bpf_prog_free(struct bpf_prog *fp)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_prog_free);
+bool bpf_enable_private_stack(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+ if (prog->aux->stack_depth <= 64)
+ return false;
+
+ switch (prog->aux->prog->type) {
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE:
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT:
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT:
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT:
+ return true;
+ case BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING:
+ if (prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_ITER)
+ return true;
+ fallthrough;
+ default:
+ return false;
+ }
+}
+
/* RNG for unprivileged user space with separated state from prandom_u32(). */
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rnd_state, bpf_user_rnd_state);
@@ -2244,6 +2244,7 @@ static void __bpf_prog_put_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
kvfree(aux->func_info);
kfree(aux->func_info_aux);
+ free_percpu(aux->prog->private_stack_ptr);
free_uid(aux->user);
security_bpf_prog_free(aux->prog);
bpf_prog_free(aux->prog);
The main motivation for private stack comes from nested scheduler in sched-ext from Tejun. The basic idea is that - each cgroup will its own associated bpf program, - bpf program with parent cgroup will call bpf programs in immediate child cgroups. Let us say we have the following cgroup hierarchy: root_cg (prog0): cg1 (prog1): cg11 (prog11): cg111 (prog111) cg112 (prog112) cg12 (prog12): cg121 (prog121) cg122 (prog122) cg2 (prog2): cg21 (prog21) cg22 (prog22) cg23 (prog23) In the above example, prog0 will call a kfunc which will call prog1 and prog2 to get sched info for cg1 and cg2 and then the information is summarized and sent back to prog0. Similarly, prog11 and prog12 will be invoked in the kfunc and the result will be summarized and sent back to prog1, etc. Currently, for each thread, the x86 kernel allocate 8KB stack. The each bpf program (including its subprograms) has maximum 512B stack size to avoid potential stack overflow. And nested bpf programs increase the risk of stack overflow. To avoid potential stack overflow caused by bpf programs, this patch implemented a private stack so bpf program stack space is allocated dynamically when the program is jited. Such private stack is applied to tracing programs like kprobe/uprobe, perf_event, tracepoint, raw tracepoint and tracing. But more than one instance of the same bpf program may run in the system. To make things simple, percpu private stack is allocated for each program, so if the same program is running on different cpus concurrently, we won't have any issue. Note that the kernel already have logic to prevent the recursion for the same bpf program on the same cpu (kprobe, fentry, etc.). The patch implemented a percpu private stack based approach for x86 arch. - The stack size will be 0 and any stack access is from jit-time allocated percpu storage. - In the beginning of jit, r9 is used to save percpu private stack pointer. - Each rbp in the bpf asm insn is replaced by r9. - For each call, push r9 before the call and pop r9 after the call to preserve r9 value. Compared to previous RFC patch [1], this patch added some conditions to enable private stack, e.g., verifier calculated stack size, prog type, etc. The new patch also added a performance test to compare private stack vs. no private stack. The following are some code example to illustrate the idea for selftest cgroup_skb_sk_lookup: the existing code the private-stack approach code endbr64 endbr64 nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0] nop DWORD PTR [rax+rax*1+0x0] xchg ax,ax xchg ax,ax push rbp push rbp mov rbp,rsp mov rbp,rsp endbr64 endbr64 sub rsp,0x68 push rbx push rbx ... ... ... mov r9d,0x8c1c860 ... add r9,QWORD PTR gs:0x21a00 ... ... mov rdx,rbp mov rdx, r9 add rdx,0xffffffffffffffb4 rdx,0xffffffffffffffb4 ... ... mov ecx,0x28 mov ecx,0x28 push r9 call 0xffffffffe305e474 call 0xffffffffe305e524 pop r9 mov rdi,rax mov rdi,rax ... ... movzx rdi,BYTE PTR [rbp-0x46] movzx rdi,BYTE PTR [r9-0x46] ... ... So the number of insns is increased by 1 + num_of_calls * 2. Here the number of calls are those calls in the final jited binary. Comparing function call itself, the push/pop overhead should be minimum in most common cases. Question: Note that I didn't add struct_ops bpf prgram in the list. We probably should for the use case I mentioned in the above for nested scheduler. But for tcp congestion control, there is no need to use private stack since there is no nesting there. I guess I can add struct_ops for sched-ext only once it is merged. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/707970c5-6bba-450a-be08-adf24d8b9276@linux.dev/T/ Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev> --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/linux/bpf.h | 2 ++ kernel/bpf/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++ kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 1 + 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)