diff mbox series

[2/2] selftests/bpf: Change uretprobe syscall number in uprobe_syscall test

Message ID 20240712135228.1619332-3-jolsa@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series uprobe: Fix uretprobe syscall wiring | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Jiri Olsa July 12, 2024, 1:52 p.m. UTC 
Fixing the syscall number value.

Fixes: 9e7f74e64ae5 ("selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko July 12, 2024, 6:27 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 6:53 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Fixing the syscall number value.
>
> Fixes: 9e7f74e64ae5 ("selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test")
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>

is this selftest in probes/for-next already? If yes, I'd combine these
two patches to avoid any bisection problems

but either way

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>


> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> index c8517c8f5313..bd8c75b620c2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void)
>  }
>
>  #ifndef __NR_uretprobe
> -#define __NR_uretprobe 463
> +#define __NR_uretprobe 467
>  #endif
>
>  __naked unsigned long uretprobe_syscall_call_1(void)
> --
> 2.45.2
>
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) July 15, 2024, 5:46 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:27:30 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 6:53 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Fixing the syscall number value.
> >
> > Fixes: 9e7f74e64ae5 ("selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test")
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> 
> is this selftest in probes/for-next already? If yes, I'd combine these
> two patches to avoid any bisection problems
> 
> but either way
> 
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>

Thanks, let me pick it to for-next branch.

Thank you,

> 
> 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > index c8517c8f5313..bd8c75b620c2 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void)
> >  }
> >
> >  #ifndef __NR_uretprobe
> > -#define __NR_uretprobe 463
> > +#define __NR_uretprobe 467
> >  #endif
> >
> >  __naked unsigned long uretprobe_syscall_call_1(void)
> > --
> > 2.45.2
> >
Jiri Olsa July 15, 2024, 7:34 a.m. UTC | #3 
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 02:46:51PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 11:27:30 -0700
> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 6:53 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Fixing the syscall number value.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9e7f74e64ae5 ("selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall call from user space test")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > 
> > is this selftest in probes/for-next already? If yes, I'd combine these
> > two patches to avoid any bisection problems

yes it's all there.. I don't mind squashing it, I just did not want
to combine kernel and user space parts.. up to Masami I guess

> > 
> > but either way
> > 
> > Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks, let me pick it to for-next branch.

thanks,
jirka

> 
> Thank you,
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > > index c8517c8f5313..bd8c75b620c2 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
> > > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void)
> > >  }
> > >
> > >  #ifndef __NR_uretprobe
> > > -#define __NR_uretprobe 463
> > > +#define __NR_uretprobe 467
> > >  #endif
> > >
> > >  __naked unsigned long uretprobe_syscall_call_1(void)
> > > --
> > > 2.45.2
> > >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
index c8517c8f5313..bd8c75b620c2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_syscall.c
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@  static void test_uretprobe_regs_change(void)
 }
 
 #ifndef __NR_uretprobe
-#define __NR_uretprobe 463
+#define __NR_uretprobe 467
 #endif
 
 __naked unsigned long uretprobe_syscall_call_1(void)