diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix wrong binary in Makefile log output

Message ID 20240720052535.2185967-1-tony.ambardar@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit efb1d64030efe048aa55313094abb8e129c8cbf0
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix wrong binary in Makefile log output | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 661 this patch: 661
netdev/build_tools success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 16 of 17 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 663 this patch: 663
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 667 this patch: 667
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 36 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2

Commit Message

Tony Ambardar July 20, 2024, 5:25 a.m. UTC 
Make log output incorrectly shows 'test_maps' as the binary name for every
'CLNG-BPF' build step, apparently picking up the last value defined for the
$(TRUNNER_BINARY) variable. Update the 'CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE' variants to
fix this confusing output.

Current output:
  CLNG-BPF [test_maps] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
  GEN-SKEL [test_progs] access_map_in_map.skel.h
  ...
  CLNG-BPF [test_maps] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
  GEN-SKEL [test_progs-no_alu32] access_map_in_map.skel.h
  ...
  CLNG-BPF [test_maps] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
  GEN-SKEL [test_progs-cpuv4] access_map_in_map.skel.h

After fix:
  CLNG-BPF [test_progs] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
  GEN-SKEL [test_progs] access_map_in_map.skel.h
  ...
  CLNG-BPF [test_progs-no_alu32] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
  GEN-SKEL [test_progs-no_alu32] access_map_in_map.skel.h
  ...
  CLNG-BPF [test_progs-cpuv4] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
  GEN-SKEL [test_progs-cpuv4] access_map_in_map.skel.h

Fixes: a5d0c26a2784 ("selftests/bpf: Add a cpuv4 test runner for cpu=v4 testing")
Fixes: 89ad7420b25c ("selftests/bpf: Drop the need for LLVM's llc")
Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Comments

bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org July 20, 2024, 5:49 a.m. UTC | #1 
Dear patch submitter,

CI has tested the following submission:
Status:     SUCCESS
Name:       [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix wrong binary in Makefile log output
Patchwork:  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=872645&state=*
Matrix:     https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10017878438

No further action is necessary on your part.


Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have
questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at
kernel-ci@meta.com.
bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org July 22, 2024, 3:17 p.m. UTC | #2 
Dear patch submitter,

CI has tested the following submission:
Status:     FAILURE
Name:       [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix wrong binary in Makefile log output
Patchwork:  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=872645&state=*
Matrix:     https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10043109164

Failed jobs:
test_maps-s390x-gcc: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10043109164/job/27755765176


Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have
questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at
kernel-ci@meta.com.
bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org July 22, 2024, 7:58 p.m. UTC | #3 
Dear patch submitter,

CI has tested the following submission:
Status:     SUCCESS
Name:       [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix wrong binary in Makefile log output
Patchwork:  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=872645&state=*
Matrix:     https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10047154037

No further action is necessary on your part.


Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have
questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at
kernel-ci@meta.com.
bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org July 23, 2024, 1:40 a.m. UTC | #4 
Dear patch submitter,

CI has tested the following submission:
Status:     FAILURE
Name:       [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix wrong binary in Makefile log output
Patchwork:  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=872645&state=*
Matrix:     https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050695919

Failed jobs:
test_progs_no_alu32-aarch64-gcc: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050695919/job/27779231748
test_progs_no_alu32-s390x-gcc: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050695919/job/27779297532
test_progs_no_alu32-x86_64-gcc: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050695919/job/27779286074
test_progs_no_alu32-x86_64-llvm-17: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050695919/job/27779294437
test_progs_no_alu32-x86_64-llvm-18: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10050695919/job/27779298637

First test_progs failure (test_progs_no_alu32-aarch64-gcc):
#134 libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts
libbpf: prog 'check_access': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
libbpf: prog 'check_access': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:27
0: (b7) r0 = 0                        ; R0_w=0
1: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0)
func 'bpf_lsm_bpf_map' arg0 has btf_id 2072 type STRUCT 'bpf_map'
2: R1=ctx() R2_w=trusted_ptr_bpf_map()
; if (map != (struct bpf_map *)&data_input) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:29
2: (18) r3 = 0xffff0000c3072800       ; R3_w=map_ptr(map=data_input,ks=4,vs=4)
4: (5d) if r2 != r3 goto pc+4         ; R2_w=trusted_ptr_bpf_map() R3_w=map_ptr(map=data_input,ks=4,vs=4)
; int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:27
5: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 +8)          ; R0_w=scalar() R1=ctx()
; if (fmode & FMODE_WRITE) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:32
6: (67) r0 <<= 62                     ; R0_w=scalar(smax=0x4000000000000000,umax=0xc000000000000000,smin32=0,smax32=umax32=0,var_off=(0x0; 0xc000000000000000))
7: (c7) r0 s>>= 63                    ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-1,smax=smax32=0)
;  @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:0
8: (57) r0 &= -13                     ; R0_w=scalar(smax=0x7ffffffffffffff3,umax=0xfffffffffffffff3,smax32=0x7ffffff3,umax32=0xfffffff3,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffff3))
; int BPF_PROG(check_access, struct bpf_map *map, fmode_t fmode) @ test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts.c:27
9: (95) exit
At program exit the register R0 has smax=9223372036854775795 should have been in [-4095, 0]
processed 9 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0
-- END PROG LOAD LOG --
libbpf: prog 'check_access': failed to load: -22
libbpf: failed to load object 'test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts'
libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts': -22
test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts:FAIL:test_libbpf_get_fd_by_id_opts__open_and_load unexpected error: -22


Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have
questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at
kernel-ci@meta.com.
bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org July 23, 2024, 2:46 a.m. UTC | #5 
Dear patch submitter,

CI has tested the following submission:
Status:     SUCCESS
Name:       [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix wrong binary in Makefile log output
Patchwork:  https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=872645&state=*
Matrix:     https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/10051528751

No further action is necessary on your part.


Please note: this email is coming from an unmonitored mailbox. If you have
questions or feedback, please reach out to the Meta Kernel CI team at
kernel-ci@meta.com.
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org July 23, 2024, 8:30 p.m. UTC | #6 
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 22:25:35 -0700 you wrote:
> Make log output incorrectly shows 'test_maps' as the binary name for every
> 'CLNG-BPF' build step, apparently picking up the last value defined for the
> $(TRUNNER_BINARY) variable. Update the 'CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE' variants to
> fix this confusing output.
> 
> Current output:
>   CLNG-BPF [test_maps] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
>   GEN-SKEL [test_progs] access_map_in_map.skel.h
>   ...
>   CLNG-BPF [test_maps] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
>   GEN-SKEL [test_progs-no_alu32] access_map_in_map.skel.h
>   ...
>   CLNG-BPF [test_maps] access_map_in_map.bpf.o
>   GEN-SKEL [test_progs-cpuv4] access_map_in_map.skel.h
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next,v2] selftests/bpf: Fix wrong binary in Makefile log output
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/efb1d64030ef

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index 0b4bfbc0ef68..41acba62b8c4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -428,23 +428,24 @@  $(OUTPUT)/cgroup_getset_retval_hooks.o: cgroup_getset_retval_hooks.h
 # $1 - input .c file
 # $2 - output .o file
 # $3 - CFLAGS
+# $4 - binary name
 define CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE
-	$(call msg,CLNG-BPF,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$2)
+	$(call msg,CLNG-BPF,$4,$2)
 	$(Q)$(CLANG) $3 -O2 --target=bpf -c $1 -mcpu=v3 -o $2
 endef
 # Similar to CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE, but with disabled alu32
 define CLANG_NOALU32_BPF_BUILD_RULE
-	$(call msg,CLNG-BPF,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$2)
+	$(call msg,CLNG-BPF,$4,$2)
 	$(Q)$(CLANG) $3 -O2 --target=bpf -c $1 -mcpu=v2 -o $2
 endef
 # Similar to CLANG_BPF_BUILD_RULE, but with cpu-v4
 define CLANG_CPUV4_BPF_BUILD_RULE
-	$(call msg,CLNG-BPF,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$2)
+	$(call msg,CLNG-BPF,$4,$2)
 	$(Q)$(CLANG) $3 -O2 --target=bpf -c $1 -mcpu=v4 -o $2
 endef
 # Build BPF object using GCC
 define GCC_BPF_BUILD_RULE
-	$(call msg,GCC-BPF,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$2)
+	$(call msg,GCC-BPF,$4,$2)
 	$(Q)$(BPF_GCC) $3 -DBPF_NO_PRESERVE_ACCESS_INDEX -Wno-attributes -O2 -c $1 -o $2
 endef
 
@@ -537,7 +538,7 @@  $(TRUNNER_BPF_OBJS): $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/%.bpf.o:				\
 	$$(call $(TRUNNER_BPF_BUILD_RULE),$$<,$$@,			\
 					  $(TRUNNER_BPF_CFLAGS)         \
 					  $$($$<-CFLAGS)		\
-					  $$($$<-$2-CFLAGS))
+					  $$($$<-$2-CFLAGS),$(TRUNNER_BINARY))
 
 $(TRUNNER_BPF_SKELS): %.skel.h: %.bpf.o $(BPFTOOL) | $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)
 	$$(call msg,GEN-SKEL,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$$@)