From patchwork Sun Jul 28 00:26:00 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Mikhail Ivanov X-Patchwork-Id: 13743815 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76229EEC0; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 00:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722126389; cv=none; b=UlfhRh+aAWpn8Uf+9YgAXQ/SH2F9NccuKoqSkxLJaVLME+0IsVEEBiXx2sxlump/qZNHYOk7M57c8tmIcroM1OlD8UcJfhPeK8aMKj3c9cBAg69A5SRc7b52zQYaLunE9qZeGoXm0Po1ORJeUqkdKCiZcW3LBDnB1HX86ydWu80= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1722126389; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1Lw7jRXd2Z4jblu4O847A7DBHGOXTkU5W9yFUphZv6c=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HrvXbjZ5iArpiCoWMQUibNc0ZtTtMYz51vC0ZBu8mDZ0yw7WdfHcIEDlUqD0cxgeaPa2nL2Ov0WOZlX2KezldzXiCis6rlMzVxAmKJ63av7TeEhBSG24t4TX/u7W/owSIgQGOb4tiT0kJk2bnV4jDVkNhwDmHFXj9c25wDnGyn0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei-partners.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei-partners.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei-partners.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei-partners.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.254]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4WWhxQ4QnGzyNqG; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:21:30 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.49]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2CC1800D0; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:26:25 +0800 (CST) Received: from mscphis02103.huawei.com (10.123.65.215) by dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.49) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:26:23 +0800 From: Mikhail Ivanov To: CC: , , , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 7/9] selftests/landlock: Test listen on ULP socket without clone method Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 08:26:00 +0800 Message-ID: <20240728002602.3198398-8-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20240728002602.3198398-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> References: <20240728002602.3198398-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: mscpeml100004.china.huawei.com (7.188.51.133) To dggpemm500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.49) X-Patchwork-State: RFC Test checks that listen(2) doesn't wrongfully return -EACCES instead of -EINVAL when trying to listen on a socket which is set to ULP that doesn't have clone method in inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ulp_ops (espintcp). Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov --- tools/testing/selftests/landlock/config | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/config b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/config index 0086efaa7b68..014401fe6114 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/config +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/config @@ -12,3 +12,4 @@ CONFIG_SHMEM=y CONFIG_SYSFS=y CONFIG_TMPFS=y CONFIG_TMPFS_XATTR=y +CONFIG_INET_ESPINTCP=y \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c index 1a4c4d1cabc2..caf5f38996ed 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/net_test.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -1709,6 +1710,43 @@ TEST_F(ipv4_tcp, listen_on_connected) EXPECT_EQ(0, close(bind_fd)); } +TEST_F(ipv4_tcp, espintcp_listen) +{ + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr = { + .handled_access_net = ACCESS_ALL, + }; + const struct landlock_net_port_attr tcp_denied_listen_p0 = { + .allowed_access = ACCESS_ALL & ~LANDLOCK_ACCESS_NET_LISTEN_TCP, + .port = self->srv0.port, + }; + int ruleset_fd; + int listen_fd; + + ruleset_fd = + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); + + /* Deny listen. */ + ASSERT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, + &tcp_denied_listen_p0, 0)); + + enforce_ruleset(_metadata, ruleset_fd); + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); + + listen_fd = socket_variant(&self->srv0); + ASSERT_LE(0, listen_fd); + + /* Set espintcp ULP. */ + EXPECT_EQ(0, setsockopt(listen_fd, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_ULP, "espintcp", + sizeof("espintcp"))); + + EXPECT_EQ(0, bind_variant(listen_fd, &self->srv0)); + + /* Espintcp ULP doesn't have clone method, so listen is denied. */ + EXPECT_EQ(-EINVAL, listen_variant(listen_fd, backlog)); + EXPECT_EQ(0, close(listen_fd)); +} + FIXTURE(port_specific) { struct service_fixture srv0;