diff mbox series

[bpf-next] bpf: remove __btf_name_valid() and change to btf_name_valid_identifier()

Message ID 20240807143110.181497-1-aha310510@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit febb6f3e3ac196602cca5738d8a189d57392324a
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series [bpf-next] bpf: remove __btf_name_valid() and change to btf_name_valid_identifier() | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
netdev/series_format success Single patches do not need cover letters
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/ynl success Generated files up to date; no warnings/errors; no diff in generated;
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 42 this patch: 42
netdev/build_tools success No tools touched, skip
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 13 of 13 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 43 this patch: 43
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/deprecated_api success None detected
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 45 this patch: 45
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 27 lines checked
netdev/build_clang_rust success No Rust files in patch. Skipping build
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-42 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-0 success Logs for Lint
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Unittests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build / build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Validate matrix.py
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for s390x-gcc / build / build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for s390x-gcc / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build / build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / build-release
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-17-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build / build for x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / build-release / build for x86_64 with llvm-18-O2
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-41 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / veristat
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for aarch64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-40 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for s390x-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_no_alu32_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / test (test_progs_parallel, true, 30) / test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for x86_64-gcc / veristat / veristat on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_verifier, false, 360) / test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-17 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-17
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_maps, false, 360) / test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-39 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_no_alu32, false, 360) / test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs, false, 360) / test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-18
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for x86_64-llvm-18 / test (test_progs_cpuv4, false, 360) / test_progs_cpuv4 on x86_64 with llvm-18

Commit Message

Jeongjun Park Aug. 7, 2024, 2:31 p.m. UTC
__btf_name_valid() can be completely replaced with 
btf_name_valid_identifier, and since most of the time you already call 
btf_name_valid_identifier instead of __btf_name_valid , it would be 
appropriate to rename the __btf_name_valid function to 
btf_name_valid_identifier and remove __btf_name_valid.

Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/btf.c | 9 ++-------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--

Comments

Alan Maguire Aug. 7, 2024, 4:53 p.m. UTC | #1
On 07/08/2024 15:31, Jeongjun Park wrote:
> __btf_name_valid() can be completely replaced with 
> btf_name_valid_identifier, and since most of the time you already call 
> btf_name_valid_identifier instead of __btf_name_valid , it would be 
> appropriate to rename the __btf_name_valid function to 
> btf_name_valid_identifier and remove __btf_name_valid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>

Looks good to me

Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>

> ---
>  kernel/bpf/btf.c | 9 ++-------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Aug. 15, 2024, 11 p.m. UTC | #2
Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Wed,  7 Aug 2024 23:31:10 +0900 you wrote:
> __btf_name_valid() can be completely replaced with
> btf_name_valid_identifier, and since most of the time you already call
> btf_name_valid_identifier instead of __btf_name_valid , it would be
> appropriate to rename the __btf_name_valid function to
> btf_name_valid_identifier and remove __btf_name_valid.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <aha310510@gmail.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [bpf-next] bpf: remove __btf_name_valid() and change to btf_name_valid_identifier()
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/febb6f3e3ac1

You are awesome, thank you!
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 520f49f422fe..674b38c33c74 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -790,7 +790,7 @@  const char *btf_str_by_offset(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static bool __btf_name_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
+static bool btf_name_valid_identifier(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
 {
 	/* offset must be valid */
 	const char *src = btf_str_by_offset(btf, offset);
@@ -811,11 +811,6 @@  static bool __btf_name_valid(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
 	return !*src;
 }
 
-static bool btf_name_valid_identifier(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
-{
-	return __btf_name_valid(btf, offset);
-}
-
 /* Allow any printable character in DATASEC names */
 static bool btf_name_valid_section(const struct btf *btf, u32 offset)
 {
@@ -4629,7 +4624,7 @@  static s32 btf_var_check_meta(struct btf_verifier_env *env,
 	}
 
 	if (!t->name_off ||
-	    !__btf_name_valid(env->btf, t->name_off)) {
+	    !btf_name_valid_identifier(env->btf, t->name_off)) {
 		btf_verifier_log_type(env, t, "Invalid name");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}